Is the Association Between Education and Fertility Postponement Causal? The Role of Family Background Factors

Demography

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 71-91

  Tropf, Felix C ^a,b   Mandemakers, Jornt J ^c  

^a NUFFIELD COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

^c WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Education; Fertility postponement; Fixed effects; Twins; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

ADULT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FAMILY SIZE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MATERNAL AGE; SOCIOECONOMICS; TWINS; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADULT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FAMILY CHARACTERISTICS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MATERNAL AGE; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TWINS; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 85008707986     PISSN: 00703370     EISSN: 15337790     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13524-016-0531-5     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Allison, P. D., & Christakis, N. (2006). Fixed-effects methods for the analysis of nonrepeated events. Sociological Methodology, 36, 155–172.
2. Amin, V., & Behrman, J. R. (2014). Do more-schooled women have fewer children and delay childbearing? Evidence from a sample of US twins. Journal of Population Economics, 27, 1–31.
3. Amin, V., Behrman, J. R., Kohler, H.-P., Xiong, Y., & Zhang, J. (2015). Causal inferences: Identical twins help and clarity about necessary assumptions is critical. Social Science & Medicine, 127, 201–202.
4. Amin, V., Behrman, J. R., & Spector, T. D. (2013). Does more schooling improve health outcomes and health related behaviors? Evidence from UK twins. Economics of Education Review, 35, 134–148.
5. Andersson, G. (2000). The impact of labour-force participation on childbearing behaviour: Pro-cyclical fertility in Sweden during the 1980s and the 1990s. European Journal of Population, 16, 293–333.
6. Andrew, T., Hart, D. J., Snieder, H., de Lange, M., Spector, T. D., & MacGregor, A. J. (2001). Are twins and singletons comparable? A study of disease-related and lifestyle characteristics in adult women. Twin Research: The Official Journal of the International Society for Twin Studies, 4, 464–477.
7. Balbo, N., & Barban, N. (2014). Does fertility behavior spread among friends? American Sociological Review, 79, 412–431.
8. Balbo, N., Billari, F. C., & Mills, M. C. (2013). Fertility in advanced societies: A review of research. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 29, 1–38.
9. Barban, N., Jansen, R., Vlaming, R., Vaez, A., Mandemakers, J. J., Tropf, F. C., & Mills, M. C. (2016). Genome-wide analysis identifies 12 loci influencing human reproductive behavior. Nature Genetics. doi:10.1038/ng.3698
10. Billari, F. (2015). Integrating macro-and micro-level approaches in the explanation of population change. Population Studies, 69, S11–S20.
11. Boardman, J. D., & Fletcher, J. M. (2015). To cause or not to cause? That is the question, but identical twins might not have all of the answers. Social Science & Medicine, 127, 198–200.
12. Branigan, A. R., McCallum, K. J., & Freese, J. (2013). Variation in the heritability of educational attainment: An international meta-analysis. Social Forces, 92, 109–140.
13. Byars, S. G., Ewbank, D., Govindaraju, D. R., & Stearns, S. C. (2010). Natural selection in a contemporary human population. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 1787–1792.
14. Conley, D., Rauscher, E., Dawes, C., Magnusson, P. K. E., & Siegal, M. L. (2013). Heritability and the equal environments assumption: Evidence from multiple samples and misclassified twins. Behavior Genetics, 43, 415–426.
15. Courtiol, A., Tropf, F. C., & Mills, M. C. (2016). When genes and environment disagree: Making sense of trends in recent human evolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 7693–7695.
16. Domingue, B. W., Fletcher, J., Conley, D., & Boardman, J. D. (2014). Genetic and educational assortative mating among US adults. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111, 7996–8000.
17. D’Onofrio, B. M., Lahey, B. B., Turkheimer, E., & Lichtenstein, P. (2013). Critical need for family-based, quasi-experimental designs in integrating genetic and social science research. American Journal of Public Health, 103, S46–S55.
18. Felson, J. (2014). What can we learn from twin studies? A comprehensive evaluation of the equal environments assumption. Social Science Research, 43, 184–199.
19. Freese, J. (2008). Genetics and the social science explanation of individual outcomes. American Journal of Sociology, 114, S1–S35.
20. Gustafsson, S., Kenjoh, E., & Wetzels, C. (2002). The role of education on postponement of maternity in Britain, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden. In E. Ruspini & A. Dale (Eds.), The gender dimension of social change: The contribution of dynamic research to the study of women’s life courses (pp. 55–79). Bristol, UK: Policy Press.
21. Hobcraft, J. (1996). Fertility in England and Wales: A fifty-year perspective. Population Studies, 50, 485–524.
22. Hoem, B. (2000). Entry into motherhood in Sweden: The influence of economic factors on the rise and fall in fertility. Demographic Research, 2(article 4), 1986–1997. doi:10.4054/DemRes.2000.2.4
23. Horwitz, A. V., Videon, T. M., Schmitz, M. F., & Davis, D. (2003). Rethinking twins and environments: Possible social sources for assumed genetic influences in twin research. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 44, 111–129.
24. Jenkins, A., & Sabates, R. (2007). The classification of qualifications in social surveys (CLS Cohort Studies Working Paper No. 2007/2). London, UK: Centre for Longitudinal Studies.
25. Joshi, H. (2002). Production, reproduction, and education: Women, children, and work in a British perspective. Population and Development Review, 28, 445–474.
26. Kirk, K. M., Blomberg, S. P., Duffy, D. L., Heath, A. C., Owens, I. P. F., & Martin, N. G. (2001). Natural selection and quantitative genetics of life-history traits in Western women: A twin study. Evolution, 55, 423–435.
27. Kohler, H.-P., Behrman, J. R., & Schnittker, J. (2011). Social science methods for twins data: Integrating causality, endowments, and heritability. Biodemography and Social Biology, 57, 88–141.
28. Kohler, H.-P., & Rodgers, J. L. (2003). Education, fertility and heritability: Explaining a paradox. In R. A. Bulatao & K. W. Wachter (Eds.), Offspring: Human fertility behavior in biodemographic perspective (pp. 46–90). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
29. Kohler, H.-P., Rodgers, J. L., & Christensen, K. (1999). Is fertility behavior in our genes? Findings from a Danish twin study. Population and Development Review, 25, 253–288.
30. Kohler, H.-P., Rodgers, J. L., Miller, W. B., Skytthe, A., & Christensen, K. (2006). Bio-social determinants of fertility. International Journal of Andrology, 29, 46–53.
31. Lappegård, T., & Rønsen, M. (2005). The multifaceted impact of education on entry into motherhood. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 21, 31–49.
32. Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in Western countries: An interpretation. In K. O. Mason & A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 17–62). Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
33. Liefbroer, A., & Corijn, M. (1999). Who, what, where, and when? Specifying the impact of educational attainment and labour force participation on family formation. European Journal of Population/Revue Européenne de Démographie, 15, 45–75.
34. Loehlin, J. C. (1996). The Cholesky approach: A cautionary note. Behavior Genetics, 26, 65–69.
35. Lutz, W., Butz, W., & KC, S. (2014). World population and human capital in the twenty-first century. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36. Lyngstad, T. H., & Prskawetz, A. (2010). Do siblings’ fertility decisions influence each other? Demography, 47, 923–934.
37. Marini, M. M. (1985). Determinants of the timing of adult role entry. Social Science Research, 14, 309–350.
38. Martin, S. P. (2000). Diverging fertility among U.S. women who delay childbearing past age 30. Demography, 37, 523–533.
39. McCrary, J., & Royer, H. (2011). The effect of female education on fertility and infant health: Evidence from school entry policies using exact date of birth. American Economic Review, 101, 158–195.
40. Miller, W. B., Bard, D. E., Pasta, D. J., & Rodgers, J. L. (2010). Biodemographic modeling of the links between fertility motivation and fertility outcomes in the NLSY79. Demography, 47, 393–414.
41. Mills, M. C., Rindfuss, R. R., McDonald, P., & te Velde, E. (2011). Why do people postpone parenthood? Reasons and social policy incentives. Human Reproduction Update, 17, 848–860.
42. Mills, M. C., & Tropf, F. C. (2015). The biodemography of fertility: A review and future research frontiers. Kölner Zeitschrift für Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie, 67, 397–424.
43. Moayyeri, A., Hammond, C., & Spector, T. D. (2013). Cohort profile: TwinsUK and healthy ageing twin study. International Journal of Epidemiology, 42, 76–85.
44. Murphy, M. (1993). The contraceptive pill and women’s employment as factors in fertility change in Britain 1963–1980: A challenge to the conventional view. Population Studies, 47, 221–243.
45. Murphy, M. (1999). Is the relationship between fertility of parents and children really weak? Biodemography and Social Biology, 46, 122–145.
46. Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
47. Neiss, M., Rowe, D. C., & Rodgers, J. L. (2002). Does education mediate the relationship between IQ and age of first birth? A behavioural genetic analysis. Journal of Biosocial Science, 34, 259–276.
48. Ní Bhrolcháin, M., & Beaujouan, É. (2012). Fertility postponement is largely due to rising educational enrolment. Population Studies, 66, 311–327.
49. Nisén, J., Martikainen, P., Kaprio, J., & Silventoinen, K. (2013). Educational differences in completed fertility: A behavioral genetic study of Finnish male and female twins. Demography, 50, 1–22.
50. Nisén, J., & Myrskylä, M. (2014). Effect of family background on the educational gradient in lifetime fertility of Finnish women born 1940–50. Population Studies, 68, 321–337.
51. Office National Statistics. (2013). Cohort fertility, Table 2 [Data set]. Retrieved from http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/publications/re-reference-tables.html?edition=tcm:77-263133
52. Oreopoulos, P. (2006). Estimating average and local average treatment effects of education when compulsory schooling laws really matter. American Economic Review, 96, 152–175.
53. Rendall, M. S., Couet, C., Lappegard, T., Robert-Bobée, I., Rønsen, M., & Smallwood, S. (2005). First births by age and education in Britain, France and Norway. Population Trends, 121, 27–34.
54. Rietveld, C. A., Medland, S. E., Derringer, J., Yang, J., Esko, T., Martin, N. W., & Koellinger, P. D. (2013). GWAS of 126,559 individuals identifies genetic variants associated with educational attainment. Science, 340, 1467–1471.
55. Rijken, A. J., & Liefbroer, A. C. (2009). Influences of the family of origin on the timing and quantum of fertility in the Netherlands. Population Studies, 63, 71–85.
56. Rindfuss, R. R., Guilkey, D., Morgan, S. P., Kravdal, O., & Guzzo, K. B. (2007). Child care availability and first-birth timing in Norway. Demography, 44, 345–372.
57. Rodgers, J. L., Bard, D. E., & Miller, W. B. (2007). Multivariate Cholesky models of human female fertility patterns in the NLSY. Behavior Genetics, 37, 345–361.
58. Rodgers, J. L., Kohler, H.-P., Kyvik, K. O., & Christensen, K. (2001). Behavior genetic modeling of human fertility: Findings from a contemporary Danish twin study. Demography, 38, 29–42.
59. Rodgers, J. L., Kohler, H.-P., McGue, M., Behrman, J. R., Petersen, I., Bingley, P., & Christensen, K. (2008). Education and cognitive ability as direct, mediating, or spurious influences on female age at first birth: Behavior genetic models fit to Danish twin data. American Journal of Sociology, 114, S202–S232.
60. Rosenzweig, M. R., & Wolpin, K. I. (1980). Testing the quantity-quality fertility model: The use of twins as a natural experiment. Econometrica, 48, 227–240.
61. Scott, J. (2004). Family, gender, and educational attainment in Britain: A longitudinal study. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 35, 565–589.
62. Skirbekk, V., Kohler, H. P., & Prskawetz, A. (2006). The marginal effect of school leaving age on demographic events. A contribution to the discussion on causality. In S. Gustafsson & A. Kalwij (Eds.), Education and postponement of maternity: Economic analyses for industrialized countries (pp. 65–85). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
63. Thornton, A. (1980). The influence of first generation fertility and economic status on second generation fertility. Population and Environment, 3, 51–72.
64. Tropf, F. C., Barban, N., Mills, M. C., Snieder, H., & Mandemakers, J. J. (2015a). Genetic influence on age at first birth of female twins born in the UK, 1919–68. Population Studies, 69, 129–145.
65. Tropf, F. C., Stulp, G., Barban, N., Visscher, P., Yang, J., Snieder, H., & Mills, M. C. (2015b). Human fertility, molecular genetics, and natural selection in modern societies. PloS One, 10(6), e0126821. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0126821
66. Tropf, F. C., Verweij, R. M., van der Most, P. J., Stulp, G., Bakshi, A., Briley, D. A.,.. Mills, M. C. (2016). Mega-analysis of 31,396 individuals from 6 countries uncovers strong gene-environment interaction for human fertility. Unpublished manuscript. doi:10.1101/049163
67. van de Kaa, D. J. (1987). Europe’s second demographic transition. Population Bulletin, 42, 1–59.
68. van Doorn, M., Pop, I., & Wolbers, M. H. J. (2011). Intergenerational transmission of education across European countries and cohorts. European Societies, 13, 93–117.