Facebook is no “Great equalizer”: A big data approach to gender differences in civic engagement across countries

Social Science Computer Review

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2017, Pages 103-125

  Brandtzaeg, Petter Bae ^a  

^a SINTEF   (Norway)

Author keywords

big data; civic engagement; cross country perspective; Facebook; gender expression; likes

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008622471     PISSN: 08944393     EISSN: 15528286     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0894439315605806     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Abraham L. B., Mörn M. P., Vollman A., (2010). Women on the web: How women are shaping the Internet. Comscore. Retrieved from http://www.comscore.com/Press_Events/Presentations_Whitepapers/2010/Women_on_the_Web_How_Women_are_Shaping_the_Internet
2. Ali A. H., (2011). Power of social media in developing nations: New tools for closing the global digital divide and beyond. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 24, 185–212.
3. Arneil B., (2003). Eyewitness report—The difference that gender makes social capital, gender and political participation. Retrieved from http://www.horizons.gc.ca/eng/content/eyewitness-report-difference-gender-makes-social-capital-gender-and-political-participation
4. Baron N. S., Campbell E. M., (2012). Gender and mobile phones in cross-national context. Language Sciences, 34, 13–27.
5. Baumgartner J. C., Morris J. S., (2010). MyFaceTube politics social networking web sites and political engagement of young adults. Social Science Computer Review, 28, 24–44.
6. Bennett W. L., (2012). The personalization of politics and political identity, social media, and changing patterns of participation. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 644, 20–39.
7. Bennett W. L., Wells C., Freelon D., (2011). Communicating civic engagement: Contrasting models of citizenship in the youth web sphere. Journal of Communication, 61, 835–856.
8. Boyd D., Crawford K., (2012). Critical questions for big data: Provocations for a cultural, technological, and scholarly phenomenon. Information, Communication and Society, 15, 662–679.
9. Brandtzaeg P. B., (2012). Social networking sites: Their users and social implications—A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 467–488.
10. Brandtzaeg P. B., Følstad A., Mainsah H., (2012). Designing for youth civic engagement in social media. In Kommers P., Isaías P., Bessis N., (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS Web Based Communities and Social Media (WBC 2012), Conference (pp. 33–43). Lisbon, Portugal: IADIS Press.
11. Brandtzaeg P. B., Haugestveit I. M., (2014). Facebook likes: A study of liking practices for humanitarian causes. International Journal of Web Based Communities, 10, 258–279.
12. Brandtzaeg P. B., Heim J., Karahasanovic A., (2011). Understanding the new digital divide—A typology of Internet users in Europe. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69, 123–138.
13. Brenner J., Smith K. (2013). 72% of online adults are social networking site users. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/Reports/2013/social-networking-sites/Findings.aspx
14. Burns N., (2007). Gender in the aggregate, gender in the individual, gender and political action. Politics & Gender, 3, 104–124.
15. Caers R., De Feyter T., De Couck M., Stough T., Vigna C., Du Bois C., (2013). Facebook: A literature review. New Media & Society, 15, 982–1002.
16. Cassandra Gender Report. (2013). What gender means to generations Y & Z. USA: The Intelligence Group (IG). Retrieved from http://www.cassandra.co/wp-content/themes/trendcentral/pdfs/Gender%20Report%20-%20Media%20Memo%20-%20SUFL2013.pdf
17. Chan D. K. S., Cheng G. H. L., (2004). A comparison of offline and online friendship qualities at different stages of relationship development. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 21, 305–320.
18. Christensen H., (2011). Political activities on the Internet: Slacktivism or political participation by other means? First Monday, 16. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/3336
19. Cicognani E., Zani B., Fournier B., Gavray C., Born M., (2012). Gender differences in youths’ political engagement and participation. Journal of Adolescence, 35, 561–576.
20. Curran J., Hayashi K., Soroka S., Aalberg T., Iyengar S., Coen S., Jones P.,, …Tiffen R., (2014). Gender matters globally: Gaps in political knowledge in a ten-nation comparative study (Submitted manuscript). Retrieved from http://www.esrc.ac.uk/my-esrc/grants/RES-000-22-3863/outputs/read/9b4b26ab-1c4c-49fa-a43b-0bcfc843ae77
21. Dalton R. J., (2008). Citizenship norms and the expansion of political participation. Political Studies, 56, 76–98.
22. Duggan M., Brenner J., (2013). The demographics of social media users, 2012 (Vol. 14). Washington, DC: Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2013/02/14/the-demographics-of-social-media-users-2012/
23. Eranti V., Lonkila M., (2015). The social significance of the Facebook Like button. First Monday. Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5505/4581
24. Gil de Zúñiga H., Jung N., Valenzuela S., (2012). Social media use for news and individuals’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17, 319–336. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x/full
25. Gil de Zúñiga H., Molyneux L., Zheng P., (2014). Social media, political expression, and political participation: Panel analysis of lagged and concurrent relationships. Journal of Communication, 64, 612–634.
26. Grimes D. A., Schulz K. F., (2002). Descriptive studies: What they can and cannot do. The Lancet, 359, 145–149.
27. Haciyakupoglu G., Zhang W., (2015). Social media and trust during the Gezi protests in Turkey. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 20, 450–466. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcc4.12121/full
28. Hajinejad M., (2013). Visual self-presentation of Iranian youth on Facebook profile pictures. Paper presented at Youth 2.0 International Workshop, Antwerp, Belgium.
29. Hale S. A., Margetts H., Yasseri T., (2013). Petition growth and success rates on the UK No. 10 Downing Street Website. In Proceedings of the 5th Annual ACM Web Science Conference (pp. 132–138). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2464518
30. Hargittai E., (2010). Digital na(t)ives? Variation in Internet skills and uses among members of the “net generation.” Sociological Inquiry, 80, 92–113.
31. Hargittai E., Shafer S., (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87, 432–448.
32. Hargittai E., Shaw A., (2013). Digitally savvy citizenship: The role of Internet skills and engagement in young adults’ political participation around the 2008 presidential election. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 115–134.
33. Herring S. C., (2003). Gender and power in on-line communication. In Holmes J., Meyerhoff M., (Eds.), The handbook of language and gender (pp. 202–228). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
34. Hooghe M., Stolle D., (2004). Good girls go to the polling booth, bad boys go everywhere: Gender differences in anticipated political participation among American fourteen-year-olds. Women & Politics, 26, 1–23.
35. Inglehart R., Norris P., (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36. Iskander E., (2011). Connecting the national and the virtual: Can Facebook activism remain relevant after Egypt’s January 25 uprising? International Journal of Communication, 5, 13–15.
37. Jugert P., Eckstein K., Noack P., Kuhn A., Benbow A., (2013). Offline and online civic engagement among adolescents and young adults from three ethnic groups. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 123–135.
38. Kennedy T., Wellman B., Klement K., (2003). Gendering the digital divide. It & Society, 1, 72–96.
39. Kohn M. L., (1989). Cross-national research in sociology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
40. Kollock P., (1999). The economies of online cooperation: Gifts and public goods in cyberspace. In Smith P., (Ed.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 220–239). London, England: Routledge.
41. Kosinski M., Stillwell D., Graepel T., (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110, 5802–5805. Retrieved from http://www.pnas.org/content/110/15/5802.short
42. Laudone M. S., (2012). Identity work on Facebook. ETD Collection for Fordham University. Dissertation. Retrieved from http://fordham.bepress.com/dissertations/AAI3512282
43. Livingstone S., Bober M., Helsper E. J., (2005). Active participation or just more information? Young people’s take-up of opportunities to act and interact on the Internet. Information, Community & Society, 8, 287–314.
44. Mathwick C., (2002). Understanding the online consumer: A typology of online relational norms. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 16, 40–55.
45. Moe H., Larsson A. O., (2013). Untangling a complex media system. A comparative study of Twitter linking practices during three Scandinavian election campaigns. Information, Communication & Society, 16, 775–794.
46. Morozov E., (2011). The net delusion: How not to liberate the world. London, England: Penguin.
47. Norris P., (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the Internet worldwide. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
48. Paxton P., Kunovich S., Hughes M. M., (2007). Gender in politics. Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 263–284.
49. Pedersen S., MacAfee C., (2007). Gender differences in British blogging. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1472–1492. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00382.x/full
50. Press Freedom Index. (2013). Retrieved from http://en.rsf.org/press-freedom-index-2013,1054.html
51. Putnam R. D., (2000). Bowling alone. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
52. Quan-Haase A., Wellman B., (2004). How does the Internet affect social capital? Social Capital and Information Technology, 113, 135–113.
53. Quan-Haase A., Young A. L., (2010). Uses and gratifications of social media: A comparison of Facebook and instant messaging. Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 30, 350–361.
54. Rainie L., Smith A., Schlozman K. L., Brady H., Verba S., (2012). Social media and political engagement. Washington, DC: Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/2012/10/19/social-media-and-political-engagement
55. Smith B. G., Gallicano T. D., (2015). Terms of engagement: Analyzing public engagement with organizations through social media. Computers in Human Behavior, 53, 82–90.
56. Statista. (2014). Number of monthly active Facebook users worldwide as of 2nd quarter 2014. Retrieved from http://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly-active-facebook-users-worldwide/
57. Steele C. M., Aronson J., (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 797.
58. Techcrunch. (2014). American users spend an average of 40 minutes per day on Facebook. Retrieved from http://techcrunch.com/2014/07/23/facebook-usage-time/
59. The Global Gender Gap Index. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.weforum.org/reports/global-gender-gap-report-2012
60. Törenli N., (2006). The ‘other’ faces of digital exclusion: ICT gender divides in the broader community. European Journal of Communication, 21, 435–455.
61. United Nations. (2002). Gender mainstreaming. New York, NY: United Nations Publications. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/womenwatch/osagi/pdf/e65237.pdf
62. Valenzuela S., Park N., Kee K. F., (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site? Facebook use and college students’ life satisfaction, trust, and participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14, 875–901. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2009.01474.x/full
63. Verba S., Burns N., Lehman Schlozman K., (1997). Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement. Journal of Politics, 59, 1055–1072.
64. Vitak J., Zube P., Smock A., Carr C. T., Ellison N., Lampe C., (2011). It’s complicated: Facebook users’ political participation in the 2008 election. CyberPsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 14, 107–114.
65. Wang Y. C., Burke M., Kraut R. E., (2013). Gender, topic, and audience response: An analysis of user-generated content on Facebook. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 31–34). New York, NY: ACM. Retrieved from http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2470659
66. Warren A. M., Sulaiman A., Jaafar N. I., (2014). Facebook: The enabler of online civic engagement for activists. Computers in Human Behavior, 32, 284–289.
67. Wellman B., Quan-Haase A., Witte J. C., Hampton K., (2001). Does the Internet increase, decrease, or supplement social capital? Social networks, participation, and community commitment. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 437–456.
68. Williams J. E., Best D. L., (1990). Sex and psyche: Gender and self-viewed cross-culturally. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
69. Williams J. E., Satterwhite R. C., Best D. L., (1999). Pancultural gender stereotypes revisited. Sex Roles, 40, 513–525.
70. Wisdom Professional. (2013). Microstrategy wisdom professional. Exceptional consumer insights and market research using Facebook data. Tysons, VT: Microstrategy. Retrieved from http://www2.microstrategy.com/download/files/social-intelligence/wisdom-professional-documentation.pdf
71. Xenos M., Vromen A., Loader B. D., (2014). The great equalizer? Patterns of social media use and youth political engagement in three advanced democracies. Information, Communication & Society, 17, 151–167.
72. Yoo S. W., Gil de Zúñiga H., (2014). Connecting blog, Twitter and Facebook use with gaps in knowledge and participation. Communication & Society, 27, 33–48.