Reimagining human research protections for 21st century science

Journal of Medical Internet Research

Volumn 18, Issue 12, 2016, Pages

  Bloss, Cinnamon ^a,b,c   Nebeker, Camille ^a,c   Bietz, Matthew ^d   Bae, Deborah ^e   Bigby, Barbara ^f   Devereaux, Mary ^g   Fowler, James ^h,i   Waldo, Ann ^j   Weibel, Nadir ^a,k   Patrick, Kevin ^a,c   Klemmer, Scott ^k,l   Melichar, Lori ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d 5226 Donald Bren Hall   (United States)

^e ROBERT WOOD JOHNSON FOUNDATION   (United States)

^f Scripps Human Research Protections Program   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^j PLLC   (United States)

^k UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^l UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

Behavioral research; Biomedical research; Ethics committees, research; Informed consent; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERROR; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INFORMED CONSENT; INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; SCIENTIST; TELEMEDICINE; THINKING; ETHICS; FORECASTING; HISTORY; TRENDS;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; FORECASTING; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 85008506412     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14388871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/jmir.6634     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Zucker B. The Belmont Report. In: Wiley Encyclopedia of Clinical Trials. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; Dec 14, 2007.
2. Nebeker C, Lagare T, Takemoto M, Lewars B, Crist K, Bloss CS, et al. Engaging research participants to inform the ethical conduct of mobile imaging, pervasive sensing, and location tracking research. Transl Behav Med 2016 Dec;6(4):577-586. [doi: 10.1007/s13142-016-0426-4] [Medline: 27688250]
3. Carter A, Liddle J, Hall W, Chenery H. Mobile phones in research and treatment: ethical guidelines and future directions. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2015;3(4):e95 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/mhealth.4538] [Medline: 26474545]
4. Eysenbach G. Towards ethical guidelines for e-health: JMIR theme issue on eHealth ethics. J Med Internet Res 2000;2(1):E7 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.2.1.e7] [Medline: 11720926]
5. Conway M. Ethical issues in using Twitter for public health surveillance and research: developing a taxonomy of ethical concepts from the research literature. J Med Internet Res 2014;16(12):e290 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/jmir.3617] [Medline: 25533619]
6. Bond RM, Fariss CJ, Jones JJ, Kramer AD, Marlow C, Settle JE, et al. A 61-million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature 2012 Sep 13;489(7415):295-298 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1038/nature11421] [Medline: 22972300]
7. Ben-Zeev D, Scherer EA, Gottlieb JD, Rotondi AJ, Brunette MF, Achtyes ED, et al. mHealth for schizophrenia: patient engagement with a mobile phone intervention following hospital discharge. JMIR Ment Health 2016;3(3):e34 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/mental.6348] [Medline: 27465803]
8. 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, Abecasis GR, Auton A, Brooks LD, DePristo MA, Durbin RM, et al. An integrated map of genetic variation from 1,092 human genomes. Nature 2012 Nov 1;491(7422):56-65 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1038/nature11632] [Medline: 23128226]
9. Jain SH, Powers BW, Hawkins JB, Brownstein JS. The digital phenotype. Nat Biotechnol 2015 May 12;33(5):462-463. [doi: 10.1038/nbt.3223] [Medline: 25965751]
10. de Montjoye MY, Radaelli L, Singh VK, Pentland AS. Identity and privacy. Unique in the shopping mall: on the reidentifiability of credit card metadata. Science 2015 Jan 30;347(6221):536-539. [doi: 10.1126/science.1256297] [Medline: 25635097]
11. [No authors listed]. Human subjects research protections: enhancing protections for research subjects and reducing burden, delay, and ambiguity for investigators. Federal Register 2011 Jul 26;76(143):44512-44531 [FREE Full text]
12. [no authors listed]. Notice of proposed rulemaking: federal policy for the protection of human subjects. Federal Register 2015.
13. Klitzman R. How local IRBs view central IRBs in the US. BMC Med Ethics Jun 23 2011:12. [doi: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-13] [Medline: 21699725]
14. National Institutes of Health. Final NIH Policy on the use of a single institutional review board for multi-site research. 2016. URL: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-16-094.html) [accessed 2016-10-31] [WebCite Cache ID 6ltef8okD]
15. Emanuel E. Reform of clinical research regulations, finally. N Engl J Med 2015 Oct 10;373(24):2296-2299. [doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1512463] [Medline: 26536071]
16. Committee on Federal Research Regulations and Reporting Requirements: A New Framework for Research Universities in the 21st Century, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law, Board on Higher Education and Workforce, Policy and Global Affairs, National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Optimizing the Nation's Investment in Academic Research: A New Regulatory Framework for the 21st Century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; Jul 2016.
17. Schneider C. The Censor's Hand. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2015.
18. Lidz C, Garverich S. What the ANPRM missed: additional needs for IRB reform. J Law Med Ethics Summer 2013;41(2):390-396. [doi: 10.1111/jlme.12050] [Medline: 23802892]
19. Bloss C. Does family always matter? Public genomes and their effect on relatives. Genome Med 2013;5(12):107. [doi: 10.1186/gm511] [Medline: 24342550]
20. Nebeker C, Linares-Orozco R, Crist K. A multi-case study of research using mobile imaging, sensing and tracking technologies to objectively measure behaviorthical issues and insights to guide responsible research practice. J Res Admin 2015;46(1):118-137.
21. Brown T. Change by Design: How Design Thinking Transforms Organizations and Inspires Innovation. New York, NY: HarperCollins; 2009.
22. Creative Commons. About the licenses: what our licenses do. Mountain View, CA: Creative Commons URL: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/[accessed 2016-10-19] [WebCite Cache ID 6lNd6mMfm]
23. Stack Overflow. New York, NY: Stack Exchange Inc; 2016. URL: http://stackoverflow.com/[accessed 2016-12-13] [WebCite Cache ID 6mjRnc3eP]
24. Mamykina L, Manoim B, Mittal M, Hripcsak G, Hartmann B. Design lessons from the fastest q&a site in the west. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2011 Presented at: CHI '11; May 7-12, 2011; Vancouver, BC, Canada p. 2857-2866. [doi: 10.1145/1978942.1979366]
25. Senge P. The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York, NY: Broadway Business; 2006.
26. NASA. Aviation Safety Reporting System. URL: https://asrs.arc.nasa.gov/[accessed 2016-10-19] [WebCite Cache ID 6lNcRUWUZ]
27. Norman D. The Design of Everyday Things. New York, NY: Doubleday; 1988.
28. Office for Human Research Protections. Code of Federal Regulations, Title 45: Public Welfare, Department of Health and Human Services. Part 46: protection of human subjects. Rockville, MD: Office for Human Research Protections; 2010 Jan URL: https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-And-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/index.html# [accessed 2016-12-13] [WebCite Cache ID 6mjSREPpp]
29. Schrag Z. Ethical Imperialism: Institutional Review Boards and the Social Sciences, 1965-2009. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2010.