How local IRBs view central IRBs in the US

BMC Medical Ethics

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2011, Pages

  Klitzman, Robert ^a  

^a Howard Hughes Medical Institute   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; DEMOGRAPHY; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; SOCIAL VALUES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79959474987     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726939     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6939-12-13     Document Type: Review

References (22)

1. Research ethics committees in Europe: Implementing the directive, respecting diversity. A Hedgecoe F Carvalho P Lobmayer F Raka, J Med Ethics 2006 32 483 486 10.1136/jme.2005.013888 16877630 (Pubitemid 44210085)
2. Impact of EU Clinical Trial Directive. S Christey, Eur J Cancer 2001 37 1805 11601422
3. Impact of recent legislative bills regarding clinical research on Italian ethics committee activity. L Porcu D Poli V Torri E Rulli MC Di Tullio M Cinquini E Bajetta R Labianca F Di Costanzo D Nitti I Floriani, J Med Ethics 2008 34 747 750 10.1136/jme.2007.022178 18827108
4. Ethics Committee or Community? Examining the identity of Czech Ethics Committees in the period of transition. J Simek L Zamykalova M Mesanyova, J Med Ethics 2010 36 548 552 10.1136/jme.2009.034298 20675735
5. Directive 2001/20/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 April 2001 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the implementation of good clinical practice in the conduct of clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. European Parliament, Official Journal of the European Communities 2001 L 121 34 44
6. Regulating research with human subjects: Is the system broken? AR Fleischman, Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2005 116 91 102 16555608
7. A review finds that multicenter studies face substantial challenges but strategies exist to achieve Institutional Review Board approval. SM Greene AM Geiger, J Clin Epidemiol 2006 59 784 790 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2005.11.018 16828670 (Pubitemid 43975723)
8. The paradoxical problem with multiple-IRB review. J Menikoff, NEJM 2010 363 1591 1593 10.1056/NEJMp1005101 20942660
9. Delays and diversity in the practice of local research ethics committees. AH Ahmed KG Nicholson, J Med Ethics 1996 22 263 266 10.1136/jme.22.5.263 8910776 (Pubitemid 26385479)
10. A central institutional review board for multi-institutional trials. MC Christian JL Goldberg J Killen JS Abrams MS McCabe JK Mauer RE Wittes, N Engl J Med 2002 346 1405 1408 10.1056/NEJM200205023461814 11986418 (Pubitemid 34754617)
11. Views and experiences of IRBs concerning research integrity. R Klitzman, J Law Med Ethics
12. The myth of community differences as the cause of variations among IRBs. R Klitzman, AJOB Prim Res
13. US IRBs confronting research in the developing world. R Klitzman, Dev World Bioeth
14. Normal misbehavior: Scientists talk about the ethics of research. R De Vries MS Anderson BC Martinson, JERHRE 2006 1 43 50 10.1525/jer.2006.1.1.43 16810336
15. A survey of IRB process in 68 U.S. hospitals. E Larson T Bratts J Zwanziger P Stone, J Nurs Scholarship 2004 36 260 264 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2004. 04047.x (Pubitemid 41725181)
16. Costs and benefits of the National Cancer Institute Central Institutional Review Board. TH Wagner C Murray J Goldberg JM Adler J Abrams, J Clin Oncol 2010 28 662 666 10.1200/JCO.2009.23.2470 19841324
17. Medical schools' attitudes and perceptions regarding the use of central institutional review boards. ED Loh RE Meyer, Acad Med 2004 79 644 651 10.1097/00001888-200407000-00007 15234914 (Pubitemid 38879065)
18. C Geertz, Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays New York: Basic Books 1973
19. A Strauss J Corbin, Basics of qualitative research - techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory Newbury Park: Sage Publications 1990
20. Challenges and changes in spirituality among doctors who become patients. R Klitzman S Daya, Soc Sci Med 2005 61 2396 2406 10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04. 031 15941613 (Pubitemid 41446244)
21. Views and approaches toward risks and benefits among doctors who become patients. R Klitzman, Patient Educ Couns 2006 64 61 68 10.1016/j.pec.2005.11.013 16427761 (Pubitemid 44772941)
22. The process of deciding about prophylactic surgery for breast and ovarian cancer: Patient questions, uncertainties, and communication. R Klitzman W Chung, Am J Med Genet 2007 152A 52 66