3D printed renal cancer models derived from MRI data: application in pre-surgical planning

Abdominal Radiology

Volumn 42, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 1501-1509

  Wake, Nicole ^a   Rude, Temitope ^a   Kang, Stella K ^a   Stifelman, Michael D ^b   Borin, James F ^a   Sodickson, Daniel K ^a   Huang, William C ^a   Chandarana, Hersh ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

3D printing; Magnetic resonance imaging; Partial nephrectomy; Surgical planning; Urological oncology

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER MODEL; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; CLAMPING APPROACH; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGING PHANTOM; KIDNEY CANCER; KIDNEY ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY MASS; KIDNEY PARENCHYMA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NEPHROMETRY SCORE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; OPEN STUDY; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY; RETROPERITONEAL APPROACH; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL APPROACH; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; TRANSPERITONEAL APPROACH; TREATMENT PLANNING; URINARY TRACT DISEASE ASSESSMENT; UROLOGIST; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; KIDNEY TUMOR; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 85008450513     PISSN: 2366004X     EISSN: 23660058     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-1022-2     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. (2009) Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol. 182(4):1271–1279. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2009.07.004
2. Zargar H, Allaf ME, Bhayani S, et al. (2015) Trifecta and optimal perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in surgical treatment of small renal masses: a multi-institutional study. BJU Int. 116(3):407–414. doi:10.1111/bju.12933
3. Broughton GJ, Clark PE, Barocas DA, et al. (2012) Tumour size, tumour complexity, and surgical approach are associated with nephrectomy type in small renal cortical tumours treated electively. BJU Int 109(11):1607–1613. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10607.x
4. Funahashi Y, Murotani K, Yoshino Y, et al. (2015) The renal tumor morphological characteristics that affect surgical planning for laparoscopic or open partial nephrectomy. Nagoya J Med Sci. 77(1–2):229–235
5. Canter D, Kutikov A, Manley B, et al. (2011) Utility of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision-making of the enhancing renal mass. Urology. 78(5):1089–1094. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2011.04.035
6. Tomaszewski JJ, Smaldone MC, Mehrazin R, et al. (2014) Anatomic complexity quantitated by nephrometry score is associated with prolonged warm ischemia time during robotic partial nephrectomy. Urology. 84(2):340–344. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.04.013
7. Simmons MN, Hillyer SP, Lee BH, et al. (2012) Nephrometry score is associated with volume loss and functional recovery after partial nephrectomy. J Urol. 188(1):39–44. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2574
8. Poon SA, Silberstein JL, Chen LY, et al. (2013) Trends in partial and radical nephrectomy: an analysis of case logs from certifying urologists. J Urol. 190(2):464–469. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.094
9. Mitsouras D, Liacouras P, Imanzadeh A, et al. (2015) Medical 3D printing for the radiologist. Radiographics. 35(7):1965–1988. doi:10.1148/rg.2015140320
10. Matsumoto JS, Morris JM, Foley TA, et al. (2015) Three-dimensional physical modeling: applications and experience at Mayo Clinic. Radiographics. 35(7):1989–2006. doi:10.1148/rg.2015140260
11. Silberstein JL, Maddox MM, Dorsey P, et al. (2014) Physical models of renal malignancies using standard cross-sectional imaging and 3-dimensional printers: a pilot study. Urology 84(2):268–272. doi:10.1016/j.urology.2014.03.042
12. Zhang Y, Ge HW, Li NC, et al. (2015) Evaluation of three-dimensional printing for laparoscopic partial nephrectomy of renal tumors: a preliminary report. World J Urol. 34(4):533–537. doi:10.1007/s00345-015-1530-7
13. Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al. (2010) 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 5(4):335–341. doi:10.1007/s11548-010-0476-x
14. Wake N, Rude T, Huang C, et al. (2015) 3D printed renal cancer models derived from MRI data: application in pre-surgical planning. Proceedings of the ISMRM. Singapore
15. Esses SJ, Berman P, Bloom AI, Sosna J (2011) Clinical applications of physical 3D models derived from MDCT data and created by rapid prototyping. AJR. 196(6):W683–W688. doi:10.2214/AJR.10.5681
16. Wake N, Chandarana H, Huang WC, Taneja SS, Rosenkrantz AB (2016) Application of anatomically accurate, patient-specific 3D printed models from MRI data in urological oncology. Clin Radiol. 71:610–614. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2016.02.012
17. Di Parma M, Coburn J, Hwang D, et al. (2016) Additively manufactured medical products—the FDA perspective. 3D Print Med 2(1):1–6
18. Ripley B, Kelil T, Cheezum MK, et al. (2016) D printing based on cardiac CT assists anatomic visualization prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement. JCCT 10:28–36
19. Kang SK, Huang WC, Pandharipande PV, Chandarana H (2014) Solid renal masses: what the numbers tell us. AJR. 202:1196–1206. doi:10.2214/AJR.14.12502
20. Heilbrun ME, Casilano DD, Beland MD, et al. (2014) ACR Appropriateness Criteria: indeterminate renal mass. ACR: Reston, p 11