Trifecta and optimal perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy in surgical treatment of small renal masses: A multi-institutional study

BJU International

Volumn 116, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 407-414

  Zargar, Homayoun ^a   Allaf, Mohamad E ^b   Bhayani, Sam ^c   Stifelman, Michael ^d   Rogers, Craig ^e   Ball, Mark W ^b   Larson, Jeffrey ^c   Marshall, Susan ^d   Kumar, Ramesh ^e   Kaouk, Jihad H ^a  

^a LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NEW YORK UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e HENRY FORD HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

favourable outcome; laparoscopic partial nephrectomy; nephron sparing surgery; perioperative outcomes; robotic partial nephrectomy; Trifecta

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHARLSON COMORBIDITY INDEX; CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; HUMAN; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY TUMOR; LAPAROSCOPIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; ROBOTIC PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGEON; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TRIFECTA; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONSERVATIVE TREATMENT; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEPHRECTOMY; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

FEMALE; GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; ORGAN SPARING TREATMENTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84938962947     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12933     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Campbell SC, Novick AC, Belldegrun A, et al. Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass. J Urol 2009; 182: 1271-9
2. Ghani KR, Sukumar S, Sammon JD, Rogers CG, Trinh QD, Menon M,. Practice patterns and outcomes for open and minimally invasive partial nephrectomy since the introduction of robotic partial nephrectomy: results from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. J Urol 2014; 191: 907-12
3. Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R,. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 2004; 64: 914-8
4. Deane LA, Lee HJ, Box GN, et al. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution. J Endourol 2008; 22: 947-52
5. Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Hillyer SP, et al. Comparative outcomes and assessment of trifecta in 500 robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases: a single surgeon experience. J Urol 2013; 189: 1236-42
6. Porpiglia F, Bertolo R, Amparore D, Fiori C,. Margins, ischaemia and complications rate after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: impact of learning curve and tumour anatomical characteristics. BJU Int 2013; 112: 1125-32
7. Buffi N, Lista G, Larcher A, et al. Margin, ischemia, and complications (MIC) score in partial nephrectomy: a new system for evaluating achievement of optimal outcomes in nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 617-8
8. Hung AJ, Cai J, Simmons MN, Gill IS,. 'Trifecta' in partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2013; 189: 36-42
9. Minervini A, Siena G, Antonelli A, et al. Open versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for clinical T1a renal masses: a matched-pair comparison of 280 patients with TRIFECTA outcomes (RECORd Project). World J Urol 2014; 32: 257-63
10. Pierorazio PM, Patel HD, Feng T, Yohannan J, Hyams ES, Allaf ME,. Robotic-assisted versus traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of outcomes and evaluation of learning curve. Urology 2011; 78: 813-9
11. Link RE, Bhayani SB, Allaf ME, et al. Exploring the learning curve, pathological outcomes and perioperative morbidity of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy performed for renal mass. J Urol 2005; 173: 1690-4
12. Levin A, Stevens PE,. Summary of KDIGO 2012 CKD Guideline: behind the scenes, need for guidance, and a framework for moving forward. Kidney Int 2014; 85: 49-61
13. Faria EF, Caputo PA, Wood CG, Karam JA, Nogueras-Gonzalez GM, Matin SF,. Robotic partial nephrectomy shortens warm ischemia time, reducing suturing time kinetics even for an experienced laparoscopic surgeon: a comparative analysis. World J Urol 2014; 32: 265-71
14. Mathieu R, Verhoest G, Droupy S, et al. Predictive factors of complications after robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a retrospective multicentre study. BJU Int 2013; 112: E283-9
15. Simhan J, Smaldone MC, Tsai KJ, et al. Objective measures of renal mass anatomic complexity predict rates of major complications following partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2011; 60: 724-30
16. Ficarra V, Bhayani S, Porter J, et al. Predictors of warm ischemia time and perioperative complications in a multicenter, international series of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 395-402
17. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG,. The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 2009; 182: 844-53
18. Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Eyraud R, et al. Three-year oncologic and renal functional outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2013; 64: 744-50
19. Marszalek M, Carini M, Chlosta P, et al. Positive surgical margins after nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 757-63
20. Bensalah K, Pantuck AJ, Rioux-Leclercq N, et al. Positive surgical margin appears to have negligible impact on survival of renal cell carcinomas treated by nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2010; 57: 466-71
21. Khalifeh A, Kaouk JH, Bhayani S, et al. Positive surgical margins in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional analysis of oncologic outcomes (leave no tumor behind). J Urol 2013; 190: 1674-9
22. Takagi T, Mir MC, Campbell RA, et al. Predictors of precision of excision and reconstruction in partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2014; 192: 30-5
23. Aboumarzouk OM, Stein RJ, Eyraud R, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 1023-33
24. Zhang X, Shen Z, Zhong S, Zhu Z, Wang X, Xu T,. Comparison of peri-operative outcomes of robot-assisted vs laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis. BJU Int 2013; 112: 1133-42
25. Froghi S, Ahmed K, Khan MS, Dasgupta P, Challacombe B,. Evaluation of robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal tumours (T1a). BJU Int 2013; 112: E322-33
26. Ficarra V, Novara G, Volpe A, Mottrie A,. Robot-assisted vs traditional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: the time for meta-analysis has not yet arrived. BJU Int 2013; 112: E334-6