Systematic mapping of the literature: Social innovation laboratories for the collaborative construction of knowledge from the perspective of open innovation

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn 02-04-November-2016, Issue , 2016, Pages 795-803

  Yañez Figueroa, José Antonio ^a   Ramírez Montoya, María Soledad ^a   García Peñalvo, Francisco J ^a,b  

^a SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING AND SCIENCES   (Mexico)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALAMANCA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Collaborative knowledge construction; Open innovation; Social innovation laboratories

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; LABORATORIES; MAPPING;

COLLABORATION TOOL; COLLABORATIVE CONSTRUCTION; COLLABORATIVE KNOWLEDGE CONSTRUCTIONS; INTERDISCIPLINARY WORK; OPEN INNOVATION; SOCIAL INNOVATIONS; STATE OF THE ART; SYSTEMATIC MAPPING;

INNOVATION;

EID: 85008235112     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/3012430.3012609     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (69)

1. Admir, Č., & Ilguen, E. (2012). Knowledge Maps & Knowledge Mapping: Literature Review.
2. Al-Belushi, K. I., Stead, S. M., & Burgess, J. G. (2015). The development of marine biotechnology in Oman: Potential for capacity building through open innovation. Marine Policy, 57, 147-157.
3. Alton-Lee, A. (2006). A Collaborative Approach to Knowledge Building to Strengthen Policy and Practice in Education: The New Zealand Iterative Best Evidence Synthesis Programme. Educational Researcher, 15(9), 5 -11. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Adrienne-Alton-Lee/publication/267196862-A-Collaborative-Approach-To-Knowledge-Building-To-Strengthen-Policy-And-Practice-in-Education-The-New-Zealand-Iterative-Best-Evidence-Synthesis-Programme/links/55e8ac1b08ae65b638999a89.pdf.
4. Arsad, N., Sanusi, H., Majid, R. A., Ali, M. M., & Husain, H. (2012). Lateral Thinking through Black Box Experiment among Engineering Students. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 60, 14-20.
5. Bellefontaine, T. (2012). Innovation Labs: Bridging Think Tanks and Do Tanks. Policy Horizons Canada.
6. Bolaños, A. J., & Aguilera, F. A. (2014). Caracterización del modelo de aprendizaje a partir de laboratorios de diseño con énfasis en factores sociales. Revista de Arquitectura, (16), 26 -37. Retrieved from http://editorial.ucatolica.edu.co/ojsucatolica.
7. Booth, A., Sutton, A., & Papaioannou, D. (2016). Systematic approaches to a successful literature review. Sage.
8. Bravo-Ibarra, E. R., León-Arenas, A. P., & Serrano-Cárdenas, L. F. (2014). Explorando las principales ventajas y factores de éxito de la innovación abierta en las organizaciones. Entramado, 10(2), 44 -59. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=5473588.
9. Buche, D., & Fringer, A. (2014). Voluntary stopping of eating and drinking at the end of life-A & 8216; systematic search and review& 8217; giving insight into an option of hastening death in capacitated adults at the end of life. BMC Palliative Care, 13, 1-1.
10. Calderón, A., & Ruiz, M. (2015). A systematic literature review on serious games evaluation: An application to software project management. Computers & Education An International Journal, 87, 396 -422. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.011.
11. Cánovas-Molina, A., Montefalcone, M., Vassallo, P., Morri, C., Nike-Bianchi, C., & Bavestrello, G. (2016). Combining literature review, acoustic mapping and in situ observations: An overview of coralligenous assemblages in Liguria (NW Mediterranean Sea). Scientia Marina, 80(1), 7-16.
12. Carroll, J. M., & Rosson, M. B. (2013). Wild at Home: The Neighborhood as a Living Laboratory for HCI. Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20(3), 28. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2491500.2491504.
13. Castro, J. W., & Acuña, S. T. (2011). Comparativa de Selección de Estudios Primarios en una Revisión Sistemática (Informe técnico) (p. 14). Madrid, España: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid. Retrieved from https://repositorio.uam.es/bitstream/handle/10486/665299/comparativa-castro-JISBD-2011.pdf?sequence=1.
14. Čavalić, A., & Erkan, I. (2012) Knowledge Maps & Knowledge Mapping: Literature Review. In: 3rd International Symposium on Sustainable Development, May 31 -June 01 2012, Sarajevo.
15. Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. United States of America: Harvard Business Press.
16. Cosgrave, E., Arbuthnot, K., & Tryfonas, T. (2013). Living labs, innovation districts and information marketplaces: A systems approach for smart cities. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 668-677.
17. Cress, U., & Kimmerle, J. (2008). A systemic and cognitive view on collaborative knowledge building with wikis. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(2), 105-122.
18. Devarapalli, N., & Figueira, S. (2015). Leveraging Existing Tools to Help Social Enterprises: A Case Study. Procedia Engineering, 107, 90-99.
19. Di Sivo, M., & Ladiana, D. (2010). Towards a learning city the neighborhood lab and the lab net. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2, 5349 -5356. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.872.
20. Edwards-Schachter, M. E., Tams, S., & Moreno-Valdés, M. T. (2013). Do systemic collaboration and network governance matter? Living Labs beyond user-driven innovation.
21. Engel, A., & Onrubia, J. (2014). Estrategias discursivas para la construcción colaborativa del conocimiento en entornos virtuales de aprendizaje. Cultura y Educación, 25(1), 77 -94. http://doi.org/10.1174/113564013806309082.
22. Eriksson, R., Nenonen, S., Junghans, A., Nielsen, S. B., & Lindahl, G. (2015). Nordic Campus Retrofitting Concepts-Scalable Practices. Procedia Economics and Finance, 21, 329-336.
23. Espinosa, E. C., Montekio, V. B., Rabanal, J. A., & Bello, L. G. (2016). Utilización del conocimiento tácito por proveedores de atención a la salud materna: Mapeo sistemático de la literatura. Gaceta Sanitaria, 30(2), 148-153.
24. Fernández, L., & García, M. (2011). Prototipos colaborativos en la era digital. Telos: Cuadernos de comunicación e innovación, (88), 3. Retrieved from https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/articulo?codigo=3734088.
25. Finquelievich, S. (2014). Innovación abierta en la Sociedad del Conocimiento. Redes transnacionales y comunidades locales. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Instituto de Investigaciones Gino Germani, Facultad de Ciencias Sociales, UBA. Retrieved from https://works.bepress.com/susana-finquelievich/5/.
26. Freitag, M., Hämmerle, O., & Wiesner, S. (2016). Overview about Service Labs worldwide: Approaches, Methods and Use Cases to test Service across Lifecycle. Procedia CIRP, 47, 549-554.
27. Ganeshan, K. (2008). CKBLS: An interactive system for collaborative knowledge building and learning. In Proceedings of the 7th WSEAS International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Knowledge Engineering and Databases (AIKED'08) (pp. 20-22).
28. Garro-Gil, N. (2012). Education as a help to the growth considering relational approach. Procedia -Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 4306 -4309. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.245.
29. Giannoulis, N., Kagia, A., Kakoulidis, P., Rikkou, C., & Skourlas, C. (2013). Personalized Adaptive Networked Learning for Disabled Students & Social Networking for the Inclusion of students-The Multimedu tool. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 451-455.
30. Heger, T., & Boman, M. (2015). Networked foresight-The case of EIT ICT Labs. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 101, 147 -164. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.02.002.
31. Hernández, I. D., & Sánchez, O. (2014). Innovación social abierta en el diseño de una política y estrategia de formalización sostenible: Un caso Colombiano de gobierno colaborativo. Revista de Ciencias Económicas, XXII(2), 47 -61.
32. Imbos, T., Vesseur, A., & Koehorst, A. (2006). A Tool for Collaborative Knowledge-Building in Statistics Education. Brasil: 7 International Conference on Teaching Statistics. Retrieved from http://www.ime.usp.br/~abe/ICOTS7/Proceedings/PDFs/ContributedPapers/C317.pdf.
33. Innovación Ciudadana en Iberoamérica. (2016). Laboratorios ciudadanos: Espacios para la innovación ciudadana. Retrieved from http://ciudadania20.org/labsciudadanos/.
34. Kerr, K., Dyson, A., & Gallannaugh, F. (2016). Conceptualising school-community relations in disadvantaged neighbourhoods: Mapping the literature. Educational Research, 58(3), 265-282.
35. Kettunen, J. (2016). Open Innovation Alliances and Communities in Higher Education. Business Education & Accreditation, 8(1), 15-26.
36. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for Performing Systematic Reviews (Technical report No. 0400011T.1) (pp. 1 -26). United Kingdom: Keele University. Retrieved from http://www.ucalgary.ca/~medlibr/kitchenham-2004.pdf.
37. Kitchenham, B. (2007). Guidelines for performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering (Technical report No. 2.3) (p. 65). United Kingdom: Keele University. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/download/35830450/2-143465389588742151.pdf.
38. Klievink, B., Bharosa, N., & Tan, Y. H. (2016). The collaborative realization of public values and business goals: Governance and infrastructure of public-private information platforms. Government Information Quarterly, 33(1), 67-79.
39. Kosfeld, M., & Von Siemens, F. (2011). Competition, Cooperation, and Corporate Culture. The RAND Journal of Economics, 42(1), 23 -43. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-2171.2010.00124.x.
40. Lafuente, A. (s./f.) Taller de prototipado. Madrid: Media Lab Prado. Retrieved from http://medialabprado.es/mmedia/5/5347/5347.pdf.
41. Longdon, M. (2008). Innovation metrics: The innovation process and how to measure it. Innovation Labs White Paper, Innovation Labs, Walnut Creek, CA.
42. Macchi, D., & Solari, M. (2012). Mapeo Sistemático de la Literatura sobre la Adopción de Inspecciones de Software. In Conferencia Latinoamericana de Informática (CLEI 2012).
43. Machi, L. A., & McEvoy, B. T. (2016). The literature review: Six steps to success. Corwin Press.
44. Martínez-Torres, R. (2013). Análisis de las comunidades de innovación abierta desde la perspectiva del Análisis de Redes Sociales. Intangible Capital, 9(1), 46-54. http://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.352.
45. Martins, S. R., & Lino, J. (2014). The next frontier: Open innovation and prospecting of knowledge in highly complex environments -Towards value creation in high tech Industries. African Journal of Business Management, 8(8), 270 -282. http://doi.org/10.5897/AJBM2014.7365.
46. Matturro, G., & Saavedra, J. (2012). Factores que Inciden en la Mejora de Procesos Software. Un mapeo sistemático de la literatura. In CIbSE (pp. 84-97).
47. Melo, J. M. (2014). XI Congreso Nacional de Sociología (Vol. XI, p. 15). Presented at the Una lectura a las formas de Intervención Social impulsadas desde el Centro de Innovación Social de Colombia: El caso de las convocatorias de innovación abierta, Medellín, Colombia: Universidad de Antioquia. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/26238123/Una-lectura-A-las-formas-de-Intervenci%C3%B3n-Social-impulsadas-desde-el-Centro-de-Innovaci%C3%B3n-Social-de-Colombia-El-caso-de-las-convocatorias-de-innovaci%C3%B3n-Abierta.
48. Moghri, J., Mohammad, A. R. A. B., Rashidian, A., & Sari, A. A. (2016). Physician Dual Practice: A Descriptive Mapping Review of Literature. Iranian journal of public health, 45(3), 278.
49. Monereo, C., & Badia, A. (2013). Aprendizaje estratégico y tecnologías de la información y La comunicación: una revisión crítica. Teoría de la Educación. Educación y Cultura en la Sociedad de la Información, 14(2), 15 -41. http://doi.org/10.14201.
50. Mulvenna, M., Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., Wallace, J., Galbraith, B., & Martin, S. (2010, October). Living labs as engagement models for innovation. In eChallenges e-2010 Conference (pp. 1-11). IEEE.
51. Murugananthan, V. R., Govindaraj, K., & Sakthimurugan, D. (2014). Process Planning Through Value Stream Mapping In Foundry. International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 3.
52. Neiva, F. W., David, J. M. N., Braga, R., & Campos, F. (2016). Towards pragmatic interoperability to support collaboration: A systematic review and mapping of the literature. Information and Software Technology, 72, 137-150.
53. Noguera, I. (2013). Orientaciones pedagógicas para el diseño y apoyo de tareas de construcción colaborativa del conocimiento. Teoría de La Educación. Educación Y Cultura En La Sociedad de La Información, 14(1), 51 -75. http://doi.org/10.14201.
54. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., Frels, R. K., & Hwang, E. (2016). Mapping Saldana's Coding Methods onto the Literature Review Process. Journal of Educational Issues, 2(1), 130-150.
55. Pérez-Pérez, I., del Moral, G., & Povedano, M. A. (2014). La mediación en Educación Social a través de una metodología participativa: construcción colaborativa del conocimiento. Revista de Formación e Innovación Educativa Universitaria, 7(3), 117 -129. Retrieved from http://refiedu.webs.uvigo.es/Refiedu/Vol7-3/7-3-1.pdf.
56. Rahim, N. A., Mohamed, Z. B., & Amrin, A. (2015). Commercialization of Emerging Technology: The Role of Academic Entrepreneur. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 169, 53-60.
57. Ramón, H. D., Pompei, S., López Gil, F., Occhipinti, P., & Pérez, D. (2016, May). Living Labs en la región noroeste de la provincia de Buenos Aires. In XVIII Workshop de Investigadores en Ciencias de la Computación (WICC 2016, Entre Ríos, Argentina).
58. Sauer, P. (2014). Art of Designing Teaching Laboratory Experiments: The Case of Water Management. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 122, 204-209.
59. Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2005). Knowledge Building: Theory, pedagogy, and Technology. In K. Sawyer (Ed), Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences.
60. Schiavo, E., Dos Santos-Nogueira, C., & Vera, P. (2013). Entre la divulgación de la cultura digital y el surgimiento de los laboratorios ciudadanos. El caso argentino en el contexto latinoamericano. Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad, 23(8), 179-179.
61. Silva, S. K. P. N. (2012). Applicability of value stream mapping (VSM) in the apparel industry in Sri Lanka. International journal of lean thinking, 3(1), 36-41.
62. Singh, G., Hawkins, L., & Whymark, G. (2007). An integrated model of collaborative knowledge building. Interdisciplinary Journal of Knowledge and Learning Objects, 3(January), 85-105.
63. Singh, G., & Whymark, G. (2008). Building Knowledge from Experience: Reflective Thinking as a Mediating Process for Collaborative Knowledge Building. ACIS 2008 Proceedings, 92.
64. Stahl, G. (2006). Group cognition. Computer Support for Building Collaborative Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
65. Van der Walt, J. S., Buitendag, A. A., Zaaiman, J. J., & Van Vuuren, J. J. (2009). Community living lab as a collaborative innovation environment. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 6, 421-436.
66. Van Goolen, R., Evers, H., & Lammens, C. (2014). International Innovation Labs: An Innovation Meeting Ground between SMEs and Business Schools. Procedia Economics and Finance, 12, 184-190.
67. Villar, A., Matalonga, S., & Uruguay, M. (2013). Definiciones y tendencia de deuda técnica: Un mapeo sistemático de la literatura. In Memorias de la XVI Conferencia Iberoamericana de Ingeniería de Software CIbSE 2013 (pp. 33-46).
68. Wang, R., Fang, M., & Chen, Y. (2008). A Model of Collaborative Knowledge-Building Based on Web2. 0. In Research and Practical Issues of Enterprise Information Systems II (pp. 1347-1351). Springer US.
69. Wolf, G., & Miranda, A. (2011). Construcción colaborativa del conocimiento (Primera edición). México: Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, UNAM. Retrieved from http://seminario.edusol.info/pdf/seco3.pdf.