Utilization of tacit knowledge by maternal healthcare providers: A systematic mapping of the literature;Utilización del conocimiento tácito por proveedores de atención a la salud materna: Mapeo sistemático de la literatura

Gaceta Sanitaria

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 148-153

  Calderón Espinosa, Emmanuel ^a   Becerril Montekio, Víctor ^b   Alcalde Rabanal, Jacqueline ^b   García Bello, Luis ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POMPEU FABRA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE SALUD PÚBLICA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Health personnel; Maternal health; Maternal health services; Tacit knowledge

Indexed keywords

CHILDBIRTH; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; LOWEST INCOME GROUP; MATERNAL CARE; META ANALYSIS; PERCEPTION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PREGNANCY; SKILL; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; KNOWLEDGE; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STANDARDS; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT;

FEMALE; HUMANS; KNOWLEDGE; MATERNAL HEALTH SERVICES; PREGNANCY; QUALITY IMPROVEMENT; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84959166147     PISSN: 02139111     EISSN: 15781283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2015.11.004     Document Type: Short Survey

References (50)

1. The Millennium Development Goals Report - United Nations. (Consultado el 15/04/2015.) Disponible en: . http://www.un.org/millenniumgoals/reports.shtml.
2. World Health Organization. Mortalidad materna. Centro de prensa. Nota descriptiva N°348. 2014. (Consultado el 15/12/2014.) Disponible en: . http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs348/es/.
3. Choi B., Pak A. Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives, and evidence of effectiveness. Clin Investig Med. 2006, 29:351-364.
4. National Collaborating Centre for Methods and Tools -NCCMT-Integrating different types of knowledge to inform policy-making. Hamilton, ON: McMaster University. 2011. (Consultado el 10/07/2014.) Disponible en: . http://www.nccmt.ca/registry/view/eng/104.html.
5. Sackett D., Rosenberg W., Muir Gray J., et al. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. BMJ (edición electrónica) 1996, (Consultado el 04/04/2014.) Disponible en: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71.
6. Sheikh K., Gilson L., Agyepong I., et al. Building the field of health policy and systems research: framing the questions. PLoS Med. 2011, (Consultado el 05/05/2014.) Disponible en: http://journals.plos.org/plosmedicine/article?id=10.1371/journal.pmed.1001073.
7. Cole B.L., Shimkhada R., Fielding J.E., et al. Methodologies for realizing the potential of health impact assessment. Am J Prev Med. 2005, 28:382-389.
8. Connelly J.B. Evaluating complex public health interventions: theory, methods and scope of realist enquiry. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007, 13:935-941.
9. Polanyi M. The tacit dimension 1966, 128. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10. Kothari A.R., Bickford J.J., Edwards N., et al. Uncovering tacit knowledge: a pilot study to broaden the concept of knowledge in knowledge translation. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011, (Consultado el 10/06/2014.) Disponible en: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/11/198.
11. Peters D.H., Tran N.T., Adam T. Implementation research in health: a practical guide. Alliance for Health Policy and Systems Research 2013, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
12. Gough D, Thomas J, Oliver S. Clarifying differences between review designs and methods. Systematic Reviews. 2012. (Consultado el 07/11/2014.) Disponible en: . http://www.systematicreviewsjournal.com/content/1/1/28.
13. Nonaka I. A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organ Sci. 1994, 5:14-37.
14. Moher D., Liberati A., Tetzlaff J., et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statements. Ann Intern Med. 2009, 151:264-269.
15. The World Bank. Data World Bank. (Consultado el 08/04/2015.) Disponible en: . http://data.worldbank.org/about/country-and-lending-groups.
16. Maguire M, Delahunt B. Reusable learning object (RLO) doing a thematic analysis resource for teaching practical qualitative data analysis. 2009. Disponible en: . http://hdl.handle.net/10633/5467.
17. SCImago Journal & Country Rank. (Consultado el 01/01/2015.) Disponible en: . http://www.scimagojr.com/countryrank.php.
18. Hundley V., Tucker J.S., Van Teijlingen E., et al. Midwives' competence: is it affected by working in a rural location?. Rural Remote Health 2007, (Consultado el 04/11/2014.) Disponible en: http://www.rrh.org.au/articles/subviewnew.asp?ArticleID=764.
19. Wiegers T., de Borst J. Organisation of emergency transfer in maternity care in the Netherlands. Midwifery. 2013, 29:973-980.
20. Erwin E. Critical incident analysis of the effect of self-efficacy on coping strategies in labour. Br J Midwifery. 2013, 21:137-141.
21. Bondarianzadeh D., Yeatman H., Condon-Paoloni D. A qualitative study of the Australian midwives' approaches to Listeria education as a food-related risk during pregnancy. Midwifery. 2011, 27:221-228.
22. Fleissig A., Kroll D. Achieving continuity of care and carer. Mod Midwife. 1997, 7:15-19.
23. Freitas D., Vieira B., Alves V., et al. Accommodation set in a university hospital: postpartum depression in nurses' perspective. Rev Pesqui Cuid é Fundam Online. 2014, (Consultado el 09/12/2014.) Disponible en: http://www.seer.unirio.br/index.php/cuidadofundamental/article/view/2999.
24. Oyediji E.F., Amosu A.M., Ojo E.F., et al. An assessment of decision making in midwifery practice: a case study of selected hospitals in Oyo State, Nigeria. Arch Appl Sci Res. 2011, 3:59-69.
25. Dotto L.M., Moulin N., Mamede M.V., et al. Atención prenatal: dificultades vivenciadas por las enfermeras. Rev Latino-am Enferm. 2006, (Consultado el 03/11/2014.) Disponible en: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rlae/v14n5/es_v14n5a07.pdf.
26. Monticelli M., Atherino Dos Santos E., Lorenzini Erdmann A. Being an HIV-positive mother: meanings for HIV-positive women and for professional nursing staff. Acta Paul Enferm. 2007, 20:291-298.
27. Fasan J., Zavarise D., Palese A., et al. Midwifery students' perceived independence within the core competencies expected of the midwifery community upon graduation: an Italian study. Int Nurs Rev. 2012, 59:208-214.
28. Belle M.J., Willis K. Professional practice in contested territory: child health nurses and maternal sadness. Contemp Nurse. 2013, 43:152-161.
29. Harvey N., Holmes C. Nominal group technique: an effective method for obtaining group consensus. Int J Nurs Pract. 2012, 18:188-194.
30. VanMarter L.J., Taylor F., Epstein M.F. Parental and physician-related determinants of consent for neonatal autopsy. Am J Dis Child. 1987, 141:149-153.
31. Redshaw M., Henderson J. Learning the hard way: expectations and experiences of infant feeding support. Birth. 2012, 39:21-29.
32. Ketler S.K. Preparing for motherhood: authoritative knowledge and the undercurrents of shared experience in two childbirth education courses in Cagliari, Italy. Med Anthropol Q. 2000, 14:138-158.
33. Sychareun V., Phommachanh S., Soysouvanh S., et al. Provider perspectives on constraints in providing maternal, neonatal and child health services in the Lao People's democratic republic: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013, (Consultado el 02/11/2014.) Disponible en: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/13/243.
34. Radcliffe P. Substance-misusing women: stigma in the maternity setting. Br J Midwifery. 2011, 19:497-506.
35. Oduro-Mensah E., Kwamie A., Antwi E., et al. Care decision making of frontline providers of maternal and newborn health services in the Greater Accra region of Ghana. PLoS One. 2013, (Consultado el 01/11/2014.) Disponible en: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0055610.
36. Rouvier M., González-Block M.A., Becerril-Montekio V., et al. Mapeo de problemas para la atención a la salud materna por actores estatales y federales. Salud Publica Mex. 2011, 53:48-56.
37. González-Block M.A., Rouvier M., Becerril V., et al. Mapping of health system functions to strengthen priority programs. The case of maternal health in Mexico. BMC Public Health. 2011, (Consultado el 01/11/2014.) Disponible en: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/11/164.
38. Lomoro O.A., Ehiri J.E., Qian X., et al. Mothers' perspectives on the quality of postpartum care in Central Shanghai, China. Int J Qual Heal Care. 2002, 14:393-402.
39. Bravo P., Uribe C., Contreras A. El cuidado percibido durante el proceso de parto: una mirada desde las madres. Rev Chil Obstet. 2008, 73:179-184.
40. Seng J.S., Low L.K., Sparbel K.J.H., et al. Abuse-related post-traumatic stress during the childbearing year. J Adv Nurs. 2004, 46:604-613.
41. Etchegary H., Potter B., Howley H., et al. The influence of experiential knowledge on prenatal screening and testing decisions. Genet Test. 2008, 12:115-124.
42. Stenhouse E., Letherby G., Stephen N. Women with pre-existing diabetes and their experiences of maternity care services. Midwifery. 2013, 29:148-153.
43. Dixon L., Skinner J., Foureur M. Women's perspectives of the stages and phases of labour. Midwifery. 2013, 29:10-17.
44. Rossman B., Engstrom J.L., Meier P.P. Healthcare providers' perceptions of breastfeeding peer counselors in the neonatal intensive care unit. Res Nurs Health. 2012, 35:460-474.
45. Barkin J.L., Wisner K.L., Bromberger J.T., et al. Development of the Barkin Index of Maternal Functioning. J Womens Health. 2010, 19:2239-2246.
46. Alcock G.A., More N.S., Patil S., et al. Community-based health programmes: role perceptions and experiences of female peer facilitators in Mumbai's urban slums. Health Educ Res. 2009, 24:957-966.
47. Levison J., Nanthuru D., Chiudzu G., et al. Qualitative assessment of attitudes and knowledge on preterm birth in Malawi and within country framework of care. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth. 2014, (Consultado el 1/11/2014.) Disponible en: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2393/14/123.
48. Rouvier M., Gonzalez-Block M.A., Sesia P., et al. Problems of the health system in Mexican states with high incidence of maternal mortality. Salud Publica Mex. 2013, 55:185-192.
49. PAHO-WHO. Estrategia sobre legislación relacionada con la salud (156a sesión del comité ejecutivo). Washington D.C.; 2015. Report No.: CE156/19.
50. Naciones Unidas. Transformar nuestro mundo. La agenda 2030 para el desarrollo sostenible. Disponible en: . http://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/70/L.1%26referer=/english/%26Lang=S.