Data requirement for effective calibration of process-based crop models

Agricultural and Forest Meteorology

Volumn 234-235, Issue , 2017, Pages 136-148

  He, Di ^a,b   Wang, Enli ^b   Wang, Jing ^a   Robertson, Michael J ^b  

^a CHINA AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b CSIRO   (Australia)

Author keywords

APSIM; Canola; Equifinality; Parameterization; Plant density

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL MODELING; BAYESIAN ANALYSIS; CALIBRATION; CANOLA; CULTIVAR; ERROR ANALYSIS; MODEL VALIDATION; NUMERICAL MODEL; PARAMETERIZATION; SOWING DATE; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

BRASSICA NAPUS VAR. NAPUS;

EID: 85008225470     PISSN: 01681923     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2016.12.015     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Angulo, C., Rötter, R., Lock, R., Enders, A., Fronzek, S., Ewert, F., Implication of crop model calibration strategies for assessing regional impacts of climate change in Europe. Agric. For. Meteorol. 170 (2013), 32–46, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.11.017.
2. Asseng, S., Ewert, F., Rosenzweig, C., et al. Uncertainty in simulating wheat yields under climate change. Nat. Clim. Chang. 3 (2013), 827–832, 10.1038/nclimate1916.
3. Bassu, S., Brisson, N., Durand, J.L., et al. How do various maize crop models vary in their responses to climate change factors?. Glob. Chang. Biol. 20 (2014), 2301–2320, 10.1111/gcb.12520.
4. Black, J.N., Bonython, C.W., Prescott, J.A., Solar radiation and the duration of sunshine. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 80 (1954), 231–235, 10.1002/qj.49708034411.
5. Boote, K.J., Porter, C., Jones, J.W., et al. Sentinel site data for crop model improvement—definition and characterization. Improving Modeling Tools to Assess Climate Change Effects on Crop Response, 2015, 10.2134/advagricsystmodel7.2014.0019.
6. Chen, X., Comparative Study on Growth Development and Yield of Different Maturity Canola Varieties in Early and Late Sowing Date. Master Thesis. 2013, Huazhong Agricultural University.
7. Dumont, B., Parameter identification of the STICS crop model, using an accelerated formal MCMC approach. Environ. Model. Softw. 52 (2014), 121–135, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2013.10.022.
8. Farré, I., Robertson, M.J., Walton, G.H., Asseng, S., Simulating phenology and yield response of canola to sowing date in Western Australia using the APSIM model. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 53 (2002), 1155–1164, 10.1071/AR02031.
9. Hammer, G.L., Chapman, S., Van Oosterom, E., Podlich, D.W., Trait physiology and crop modelling as a framework to link phenotypic complexity to underlying genetic systems. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 56 (2005), 947–960, 10.1071/AR05157.
10. Hamzei, J., Soltani, J., Deficit irrigation of rapeseed for water-saving: Effects on biomass accumulation, light interception and radiation use efficiency under different N rates. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 155 (2012), 153–160, 10.1016/j.agee.2012.04.003.
11. He, D., Wang, E., Wang, J., et al. Uncertainty in canola phenology modelling induced by cultivar parameterization and its impact on simulated yield. Agric. For. Meteorol. 232 (2017), 163–175.
12. Hoffmann, M.P., Jacobs, A., Whitbread, A.M., Crop modelling based analysis of site-specific production limitations of winter oilseed rape in northern Germany. Field Crop Res. 178 (2015), 49–62, 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.03.018.
13. Holzworth, D.P., Huth, N.I., DeVoil, P.G., et al. APSIM – Evolution towards a new generation of agricultural systems simulation. Environ. Model. Softw. 62 (2014), 327–350, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.07.009.
14. Holzworth, D.P., Snow, V., Janssen, S., et al. Agricultural production systems modelling and software: current status and future prospects. Environ. Model. Softw. 72 (2015), 276–286, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.12.013.
15. Hunt, L.A., Boote, K.J., Data for Model Operation, Calibration, and Evaluation, In: Understanding Options for Agricultural Production. 1998, Springer, Netherlands, 9–39, 10.1007/978-94-017-3624-4_2.
16. Justes, E., Denoroy, P., Gabrielle, B., Gosse, G., Effect of crop nitrogen status and temperature on the radiation use efficiency of winter oilseed rape. Eur. J. Agron., 2000, 165–177, 10.1016/s1161-0301(00)00072-1.
17. Kersebaum, K.C., Boote, K.J., Jorgenson, J.S., Nendel, C., et al. Analysis and classification of data sets for calibration and validation of agro-ecosystem models. Environ. Model. Softw. 72 (2015), 402–417, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.05.009.
18. Liu, Z., Hubbard, K.G., Lin, X., Yang, X., Negative effects of climate warming on maize yield are reversed by the changing of sowing date and cultivar selection in Northeast China. Glob. Chang. Biol. 19 (2013), 3481–3492, 10.1111/gcb.12324.
19. Liu, Z., Study on Sowing Date Effect on Development of Rapeseed (Brassica Napus L.) Master Thesis. 2008, Huazhong Agriculture University.
20. Luo, Z., Wang, E., Zheng, H., Baldock, J.A., Sun, O.J., Shao, Q., Convergent modelling of past soil organic carbon stocks but divergent projections. Biogeosciences 12 (2015), 4373–4383, 10.5194/bg-12-4373-2015.
21. McCormick, J.I., Virgona, J.M., Lilley, J.M., Kirkegaard, J.A., Evaluating the feasibility of dual-purpose canola in a medium-rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia: a simulation approach. Crop Pasture Sci. 66 (2015), 318–331, 10.1071/CP13421.
22. Robertson, M.J., Lilley, J.M., Simulation of growth, development and yield of canola (Brassica napus) in APSIM. Crop Pasture Sci. 67 (2016), 332–344, 10.1071/CP15267.
23. Robertson, M.J., Holland, J.F., Kirkegaard, J.A., Smith, C.J., Simulation Growth and Development of Canola in Australia. 1999, 10th International Rapeseed Congress, Canberra.
24. Robertson, M.J., Holland, J.F., Cawley, S., et al. Growth and yield differences between triazine-tolerant and non-triazine-tolerant cultivars of canola. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 53 (2002), 643–651, 10.1071/AR01159.
25. Robertson, M.J., Asseng, S., Kirkegaard, J.A., et al. Environmental and genotypic control of time to flowering in canola and Indian mustard. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 53 (2002), 793–809, 10.1071/AR01182.
26. Rosenzweig, C., Jones, J.W., Hatfield, J.L., et al. The agricultural model intercomparison and improvement project (AgMIP): protocols and pilot studies. Agric. For. Meteorol. 170 (2013), 166–182, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.09.011.
27. Rosenzweig, C., Elliott, J., Deryng, D., et al. Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21 st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 111 (2014), 3268–3273, 10.1073/pnas.1222463110.
28. Wallach, D., Buis, S., Lecharpentier, P., et al. A package of parameter estimation methods and implementation for the STICS crop-soil model. Environ. Model. Softw. 26 (2011), 386–394, 10.1016/j.envsoft.2010.09.004.
29. Wang, S., Wang, E., Wang, F., Tang, L., Phenological development and grain yield of canola as affected by sowing date and climate variation in the Yangtze River Basin of China. Crop Pasture Sci. 63 (2012), 478–488, 10.1071/CP11332.
30. Wang, J., Wang, E., Feng, L., Yin, H., Yu, W., Phenological trends of winter wheat in response to varietal and temperature changes in the North China Plain. Field Crop Res. 144 (2013), 135–144, 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.12.020.
31. Wang, J., Wang, E., Yin, H., Feng, L., Zhao, Y., Differences between observed and calculated solar radiations and their impact on simulated crop yields. Field Crop Res. 176 (2015), 1–10, 10.1016/j.fcr.2015.02.014.
32. Wang, R., Cheng, T., Hu, L., Effect of wide-narrow row arrangement and plant density on yield and radiation use efficiency of mechanized direct-seeded canola in Central China. Field Crop Res. 172 (2015), 42–52, 10.1016/j.fcr.2014.12.005.
33. Xiong, W., Holman, I., Conway, D., Lin, E., Li, Y., A crop model cross calibration for use in regional climate impacts studies. Ecol. Modell. 213 (2008), 365–380, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.01.005.
34. Yin, X., Stam, P., Kropff, M.J., Schapendonk, A.H.C.M., Crop modeling, QTL mapping, and their complementary role in plant breeding. Agron. J., 2003, 90–98, 10.2134/agronj2003.0090.
35. Zhang, H., Flottmann, S., Seed yield of canola (Brassica napus L.) is determined primarily by biomass in a high-yielding environment. Crop Pasture Sci. 67 (2016), 369–380, 10.1071/CP15236.