Examining our foundations: Implications for gifted education research

Roeper Review

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 45-52

  Friedman‐Nimz, Reva ^a   O'Brien, Brenna ^a   Frey, Bruce B ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007823509     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190509554336     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Albert, R. (1969). Genius: Present-day status of the concept and its implications for the study of creativity and giftedness. American Psychologist, 24, 743-753.
2. Albert, R. (1975). Toward a behavioral definition of genius. American Psychologist, 30(2), 140-151.
3. Ambrose, D. (1998). A model for clarification and expansion of conceptual foundations. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 77-86.
4. Benbow, C.P. (1986). SMPY's model for teaching mathematically precocious students. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 1-25). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
5. Betts, G. T. (1986). The Autonomous Learner Model for the gifted and talented. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 27-55). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
6. Borland, J. H. (Ed.). (2003). Rethinking gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Carter, K. R., & Swanson, H. L. (1990). An analysis of the most frequently cited gifted journal articles since the Marland report: Implications for researchers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 340), 116-123.
8. Cohen, L. M., Ambrose, D., & Powell, W. N. (2000). Conceptual foundations and theoretical lenses for the diversity of giftedness and talent. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Monks, R. J. Sternberg, & R. Subotnik (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 327-340). Oxford, UK: Pergamon.
9. Coleman, L. J., Sanders, M. D., & Cross, T. L. (1997). Perennial debates and tacit assumptions in the education of gifted children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 41, 103-111.
10. Cross, T. L. (2003). Rethinking gifted education: a phenomenological critique of the politics and assumptions of the empirical-analytic mode of inquiry. In J. H. Borland (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 72-79). New York: Teachers College Press.
11. Elkind, J. (1973). The gifted child with learning disabilities. Gifted Child Quarterly, 17(2), 96-97. EndNote: About ISI Researchsoft. (2004, January 15). Retrieved April 9,2004, from http://endnote.com/enabout.asp
12. Feldhusen, J. F. (1986). A conception of giftedness. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson, (Eds.) Conceptions of giftedness (pp. 112-127). New York: Cambridge University Press.
13. Feldman, D. H. (1991). Has there been a paradigm shift in gifted education? Educating Able Learners: Discovering and Nurturing Talent, 16(4), 14-19.
14. Friedman, R. C. (1992). The Zorba Syndrome: Exploring the evaluative dimensions of self concept among gifted children and youth. Quest, 3(1), 1-5.
15. Gagné, F. (1995). From giftedness to talent: A developmental model and its impact on the language of the field. Roeper Review, 18(2), 103-111.
16. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: BasicBooks.
17. Gardner, H. (1997). Six afterthoughts: Comments on "varieties of intellectual talent". Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(2), 120-124.
18. Goldring, E. (1990). Assessing the status of information on classroom organizational frameworks for gifted students. Journal of Educational Research, 83(6), 313-326.
19. Horowitz, F. D., & O'Brien, M. (1986). Gifted and talented children: State of knowledge and directions for research. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1147-1152.
20. Hunsaker, S. L. (1995). The gifted metaphor from the perspective of traditional civilizations. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 18(3), 255-268.
21. Kulik, J. A. (2003). Grouping and tracking. In N. Colangelo& G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp.268-281). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
22. Lupkowski-Shoplik, A., Benbow, C. P., Assouline, S. G., & Brody, L. E. (2003). Talent searches: Meeting the needs of academically talented youth. In N. Colangelo& G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 204-218). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
23. Paul, K. M., & Plucker, J. A. (2004). Two steps forward, one step back: Effect size reporting in gifted education research from 1995-2000. Roeper Review, 26(2), 68-72.
24. Plucker, J. A. (1997). Debunking the myth of the "highly significant" result: Effect sizes in gifted education research. Roeper Review, 20, 122-126.
25. Reis, S. M., & Renzulli, J.S. (1986). The Secondary Triad Model. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 269-304). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
26. Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness? Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60(0), 180-184.
27. Renzulli, J.S. (1980). Will the gifted child movement be alive and well in 1990? Gifted Child Quarterly, 24(1), 3-9.
28. Renzulli, J. S. (Ed.). (1986). Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
29. Renzulli, J. S. (1997). Will the gifted child movement by alive and well on 1990? Gifted Child Quarterly, 24(1), 3-9.
30. Renzulli, J. S. (2004). Expanding the umbrella: An interview with Joseph Renzulli. Roeper Review, 26(2), 65-67.
31. Renzulli, J. S., & Purcell, J. H. (1996). Gifted education: A look around and a look ahead. Roeper Review, 18(3), 173-178.
32. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1986). The Enrichment Triad/Revolving Door Model: A schoolwide plan for the development of creative productivity. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 217-265). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
33. Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2003). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: Developing Creative and Productive Giftedness. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education, (pp. 204-218). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
34. Robinson, A. (2003). Cooperative learning and high ability students. In N. Colangelo & G. A. Davis (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 282-292). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
35. Schlichter, C. (1986). Talents unlimited: Applying the multiple talent approach in mainstream and gifted programs. In J. S. Renzulli (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented (pp. 353-389). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.
36. Shore, B. M., Cornell, D. G., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. S. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education: A critical analysis. New York: Teachers College Press.
37. Sternberg, R. (1997). The concept of intelligence and its role in lifelong learning and success. American Psychologist, 52(10), 1030-1037.
38. Sternberg, R. (2000). Wisdom as a form of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 44(4), 252-260.
39. Torrance, E. P. (1968). Finding hidden talents among disadvantaged children. Gifted Child Quarterly, 12, 131-137.
40. U.S. Commissioner of Education. (1972). Education of the gifted and talented: Report to the Congress. (Document 72-5020). Washington DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
41. Wilkinson, L., & Task Force on Statistical Inference. (1999). Statistical methods in psychology journals: Guidelines and explanations. American Psychologist, 54, 594-604.