Perennial Debates and Tacit Assumptions in the Education of Gifted Children

Gifted Child Quarterly

Volumn 41, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 105-111

  Coleman, Laurence J ^a   Sanders, Michael D ^b   Cross, Tracy L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0000019691     PISSN: 00169862     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/001698629704100306     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Borland, J. H. (1990). Post positivistic inquiry: Implications of the "New Philosophy of Science" for the field of the education of the gifted. Gifted Child Quarterly, 34, 61-67.
2. Bourdieu, P. (1994). Structures, habitus, power: Basis for a theory of symbolic power. In Dirks, N., Eley, G., & Ortner, S. (Eds.), Culture/Power/History: A reader in Contemporary Social Theory. (pp. 155-199). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3. Coleman, L. J., Cross, T. L., & Sanders, M. (1992, November). Alternative inquiry in education: Hey can you paradigm? Paper presented at the National Association for Gifted Children Conference. Los Angeles.
4. Coleman, L. J., Sanders, M., & Cross, T. L. (1991, November). Theory development and inquiry: How are they connected? Paper presented at the National Association for Gifted Children Conference, Kansas City, MO.
5. Gallagher, J. J., & Gallagher, S. A. (1994). Teaching the gifted child (4th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon.
6. Getzels, J., & Dillon, J. T. (1973). The nature of giftedness and the education of the gifted. In R. M. W. Travers (Ed.), Second handbook of research on teaching (pp. 689-731). Chicago: Rand McNally.
7. Guba, E. (Ed.). (1990). The paradigm dialogue. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
8. Hoyningen-Huene, P. (1993). Reconstructing scientific revolutions: Thomas S. Kuhn's philosophy of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
9. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago, 2nd ed. 1970.
10. Margolin, L. (1993). Goodness personified: The emergence of gifted children. Social Problems, 40, 510-532.
11. Patton, J. M. (1992). Assessment and identification of African-American learners with gifts and talents. Exceptional Children, 59, 150-159.
12. Popkewitz, T. (1984). Paradigm and ideology in educational research: The social functions of the intellectual. London: Falmer.
13. Rogers, R. (1989). A content analysis of the literature of giftedness. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 13, 78-88.
14. Sapon-Shevin, M. (1994). Playing favorites: Gifted education and the disruption of community. Albany: State University of New York Press.
15. Shore, B., Cornell, D., Robinson, A., & Ward, V. (1991). Recommended practices in gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.
16. Skrtic, T. (1991). The special education paradox: Equity as the way to excellence. Harvard Educational Review, 61, 1991.