A longitudinal assessment of gifted students’ learning using the integrated curriculum model (icm): Impacts and perceptions of the william and mary language arts and science curriculum

Roeper Review

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 78-83

  Feng, Annie Xuemei ^a   VanTassel‐Baska, Joyce ^a   Quek, Chwee ^a   Bai, Wenyu ^a   O'Neill, Barbara ^b  

^a The College of William and Mary   (United States)

^b College of William and Mary ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85007789976     PISSN: 02783193     EISSN: 1940865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02783190509554294     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Adams, C. M., & Callahan, C. M. (1995). The reliability and validity of a performance task for evaluating science process skills. Gifted Child Quarterly. 39, 14-20.
2. Burkhalter, N. (1995). A Vygotsky-based curriculum for teaching persuasive writing in the elementary grades. Language Arts, 72, 192-196.
3. Gallagher, S. A., & Stepien, W. (1996). Content acquisition in problem- based learning: Depth versus breadth in American studies. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 19, 257-275.
4. Gentry, M., Rizza, M. G., & Owen, S. V. (2002). Examining perceptions of challenge and choice in classrooms: The relationship between teachers and their students and comparisons between gifted students and other students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 145-155.
5. Grigorenko, E. L., Jarvin, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2002). Schoolbased tests of the triarchic theory of intelligence: Three settings, three samples, three syllabi. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 27, 167-208.
6. Guskey, T. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
7. Hamilton, L. S., McCaffrey, D. F., Stecher, B. M., Klein, S. P., Robyn, A., & Bugliari, D. (2003). Studying large-scale reforms of instructional practice: An example from mathematics and science. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 25(1), 1-30.
8. Hillocks, G., Jr. (1986). Research on written composition: New directions for teaching. Urbana, IL: ERIC Clearinghouse on Reading and Communication Skills and National Conference on Research in English.
9. Johnsen, S. (1999). Renzulli's model: Needed research. Journal for the education of the gifted. 23, 102-116.
10. Kennedy, M. (1999). Form and substance in mathematics and science professional development. NISE Brief, 3 (2), 1-7.
11. Kupermintz, H. (2003). Teacher effects and teacher effectiveness: A validity investigation of the Tennessee Value Added Assessment System. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 25, 287-298.
12. Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29(2), 4-16.
13. Reis, S. M., Gubbins, E. J., Richards, S., Schrieber, R., Briggs, C, Jacobs, J., & Eckert, B. (November, 2003). Talented readers. Presentation at the National Association for Gifted Children 50th Annual Convention, Indianapolis, IN.
14. Reis, S. M., Westberg, K. L., Kulikowich, J. M, & Purcell, J. H. (1998). Curriculum compacting and achievement test scores: What does the research say? Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 123-129.
15. Renzulli, J. (1999). Twenty-five year perspective. Journal for the Education of the Gifted. 23, 1-54.
16. Schoenfeld, A. H. (2002). Making mathematics work for all children. Issues of standards, testing and equity. Educational Researcher, 31(1), 13-25.
17. Seltzer, M., Choi, K., & Thum, Y. M. (2003). Examining relationships between where students start and how rapidly they progress. Using new developments in growth modeling to gain insight into the distribution of achievement within schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. 25, 263-286.
18. Tomlinson, C. A., Kaplan, S. N., Renzulli, J. S., Purcell, J., Leppien Renzulli, J., & Bums, D. (2002). The parallel curriculum: A design to develop high potential and challenge high ability learners. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
19. Tyler-Wood, T. L., Mortenson, M., Putney, D., & Cass, M. A. (2000). An effective mathematics and science curriculum option for secondary gifted education. Roeper Review, 22, 266-269.
20. VanTassel-Baska, J. (2002). Assessment of gifted student learning in the language arts. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 13, 72-76.
21. VanTassel-Baska, J., Bass, G., Ries, R., Poland, D., & Avery, L. (1998). A national study of science curriculum effectiveness with high ability students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 42, 200-211.
22. VanTassel-Baska, J., Johnson, D., Hughes, C., & Boyce, L. N. (1996). A study of language arts curriculum effectiveness with gifted learners. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 19, 461-468.
23. VanTassel-Baska, J., Zuo, L., Avery, L. D., & Little, C. A. (2002). A curriculum study of gifted student learning in the language arts. Gifted Child Quarterly, 46, 30-44.
24. Wenglinsky, H. (2000). How schools matter. The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic achievement. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 10. Retrieved November 20, 2003 from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/