Hedging to save face: A linguistic analysis of written comments on in-training evaluation reports

Advances in Health Sciences Education

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 175-188

  Ginsburg, Shiphra ^a,e   van der Vleuten, Cees ^b   Eva, Kevin W ^c   Lingard, Lorelei ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^b MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^d WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Assessment; Competence; Linguistics; Qualitative

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERNAL MEDICINE; LINGUISTICS; PREVALENCE; RESIDENT; SOCIAL ENVIRONMENT; SOCIAL INTERACTION; UNIVERSITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROGRAM EVALUATION; PSYCHOLOGY; WRITING;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LINGUISTICS; PROGRAM EVALUATION; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; WRITING;

EID: 85007442740     PISSN: 13824996     EISSN: 15731677     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10459-015-9622-0     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Akmajian, A., Demers, R., Farmer, A., & Harnish, R. (2010). Ch. 9 Pragmatics. In A. Akmajian, R. Demers, A. Farmer, & R. Harnish (Eds.), Linguistics. An introduction to language and communication (Sixth ed., pp. 363-418). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. Bakker, J. (2007). Facework. In Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. Blackwell.
3. Bonnefon, J.-F., Feeney, A., & De Neys, W. (2011). The risk of polite misunderstandings. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(5), 321-324. doi:10.1177/0963721411418472.
4. Brown, P., & Levinson, S. C. (1987). Politeness: Some universals in language usage (S. C. Levinson ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cohen, G., Blumberg, P., Ryan, N., & Sullivan, P. (1993). Do final grades reflect written qualitative evaluations of student performance? Teaching and Learning in Medicine, 5(1), 10-15. doi:10.1080/10401339309539580.
6. Danesi, M. (1993). Metaphorical competence in second language acquisition and second language teaching: The neglected dimension. In J. E. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University round table on languages and linguistics 1992: Language, communication and social meaning (pp. 489-500). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
7. Dudek, N. L., Marks, M., Bandiera, G., White, J., & Wood, T. J. (2013). Quality in-training evaluation reports—does feedback drive faculty performance? Academic Medicine, 88(8), 1129-1134. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318299394c.
8. Dudek, N. L., Marks, M. B., Wood, T. J., & Lee, A. C. (2008). Assessing the quality of supervisors’ completed clinical evaluation reports. Medical Education, 42(8), 816-822.
9. Eelen, G. (2014). A critique of politeness theory (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Oxon: Routledge.
10. Fraser, B. (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics, 14, 219-236.
11. Fraser, B. (2010). Pragmatic competence: The case of hedging. In G. Kaltenbock, W. Mihatsch, & S. Schneider (Eds.), New Approaches to Hedging (1st ed., pp. 15-34). Bingley: Emerald.
12. Ginsburg, S., Eva, K. W., & Regehr, G. (2013). Do in-training evaluation reports deserve their bad reputations? A study of the reliability and predictive ability of ITER scores and narrative comments. Academic Medicine, 88(10), 1539-1544. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e3182a36c3d.
13. Ginsburg, S., Gold, W., Cavalcanti, R. B., Kurabi, B., & McDonald-Blumer, H. (2011). Competencies ‘‘Plus’’: The nature of written comments on internal medicine residents’ evaluation forms. Academic Medicine, 86(10 Suppl), s30-s34.
14. Ginsburg, S., Regehr, G., Lingard, L., & Eva, K. W. (2015). Reading between the lines: Faculty’s interpretations of narrative evaluation comments. Medical Education, 49(2), 296-306. doi:10.1111/medu.12637.
15. Guerrasio, J., Cumbler, E., Trosterman, A., Wald, H., Brandenburg, S., & Aagaard, E. M. (2012). Determining need for remediation through postrotation evaluations. Journal of Graduate Medical Education, 4(1), 47-51. doi:10.4300/JGME-D-11-00145.1.
16. Ilott, I., & Murphy, R. (1997). Feelings and failing in professional training: The assessor’s dilemma. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 22(3), 307-316.
17. Kiefer, C. S., Colletti, J. E., Bellolio, M. F., Hess, E. P., Woolridge, D. P., Thomas, K. B., & Sadosty, A. T. (2010). The ‘‘good’’ dean’s letter. Academic Medicine, 85(11), 1705-1708.
18. Lye, P. S., Biernat, K. A., Bragg, D. S., & Simpson, D. E. (2001). A pleasure to work with: An analysis of written comments on student evaluations. Ambulatory Pediatrics, 1(3), 128-131.
19. McLaren, B. M., DeLeeuw, K. E., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). A politeness effect in learning with web-based intelligent tutors. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69(1-2), 70-79. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.09.001.
20. Mills, S. (Ed.). (2003). Chapter 2. Theorising politeness. In Gender and politeness (Vol. 1, pp. 57-120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Myers, G. (1989). The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics, 10(1), 1-35.
22. Patton, M. (Ed.). (2002). Designing qualitative studies. In Qualitative research & evaluation methods (3rd ed., pp. 209-257). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
23. Prince, E., Frader, J., & Bosk, C. (1982). On hedging in physician-physician discourse. In Linguistics and the professions: Proceedings of the second annual delaware symposium on language studies (pp. 83-97).
24. Salager-Meyer, F. (1994). Hedges and textual communicative function in medical English written discourse. English for Specific Purposes, 13(2), 149-170.
25. Wang, N., Johnson, W. L., Mayer, R. E., Rizzo, P., Shaw, E., & Collins, H. (2008). The politeness effect: Pedagogical agents and learning outcomes. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 66(2), 98-112.
26. Watling, C. J., Kenyon, C. F., Zibrowski, E. M., Schulz, V., Goldszmidt, M. A., Singh, I., et al. (2008). Rules of engagement: Residents’ perceptions of the in-training evaluation process. Academic Medicine, 83(10 Suppl), S97-S100. doi:10.1097/ACM.0b013e318183e78c.