The role of proliferation in determining response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: A gene expression-based meta-analysis

Clinical Cancer Research

Volumn 22, Issue 24, 2016, Pages 6039-6050

  Stover, Daniel G ^a,b   Coloff, Jonathan L ^b   Barry, William T ^a   Brugge, Joan S ^b   Winer, Eric P ^a   Selfors, Laura M ^b  

^a DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3 KINASE; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3,4,5 TRISPHOSPHATE 3 PHOSPHATASE; PROTEIN KINASE B; RAS PROTEIN; VASCULOTROPIN RECEPTOR; ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENT; EPIDERMAL GROWTH FACTOR RECEPTOR 2; ESTROGEN RECEPTOR;

ADJUVANT CHEMOTHERAPY; ADULT; ARTICLE; AURKA GENE; BREAST CANCER; CANCER CELL; CANCER RESISTANCE; CELL CYCLE G2 PHASE; CELL CYCLE S PHASE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CHEMOSENSITIVITY; DNA DAMAGE; FIBROBLAST; GENE EXPRESSION; HUMAN; IMMUNOREACTIVITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MKI 37 GENE; ONCOGENE; PCNA GENE; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST CANCER; BREAST; CANCER STAGING; DRUG EFFECTS; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; META ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROGNOSIS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

ANTINEOPLASTIC AGENTS; BREAST; CELL PROLIFERATION; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOADJUVANT THERAPY; NEOPLASM STAGING; PHOSPHATIDYLINOSITOL 3-KINASES; PROGNOSIS; RECEPTOR, ERBB-2; RECEPTORS, ESTROGEN; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TRIPLE NEGATIVE BREAST NEOPLASMS;

EID: 85007021547     PISSN: 10780432     EISSN: 15573265     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0471     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Lyratzopoulos G, Abel GA, Barbiere JM, Brown CH, Rous BA, Greenberg DC. Variation in advanced stage at diagnosis of lung and female breast cancer in an English region 2006-2009. Br J Cancer 2012;106:1068-75.
2. Carey LA, Perou CM, Livasy CA, Dressler LG, Cowan D, Conway K, et al. Race, breast cancer subtypes, and survival in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study. JAMA 2006;295:2492-502.
3. Siegel R, DeSantis C, Virgo K, Stein K, Mariotto A, Smith T, et al. Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin 2012;62:220-41.
4. Cortazar P, Zhang L, Untch M, Mehta K, Costantino JP, Wolmark N, et al. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: the CTNeoBC pooled analysis. Lancet 2014;384:164-72.
5. Perou CM, Sorlie T, Eisen MB, van de Rijn M, Jeffrey SS, Rees CA, et al. Molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2000;406:747-52.
6. Sorlie T, Perou CM, Tibshirani R, Aas T, Geisler S, Johnsen H, et al. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001;98:10869-74.
7. Parker JS, Mullins M, Cheang MC, Leung S, Voduc D, Vickery T, et al. Supervised risk predictor of breast cancer based on intrinsic subtypes. J Clin Oncol 2009;27:1160-7.
8. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, Andre F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008;26:1275-81.
9. Gingras I, Desmedt C, Ignatiadis M, Sotiriou C. CCR 20th anniversary commentary: gene-expression signature in breast cancer-where did it start and where are we now? Clin Cancer Res 2015;21:4743-6.
10. Desmedt C, Haibe-Kains B, Wirapati P, Buyse M, Larsimont D, Bontempi G, et al. Biological processes associated with breast cancer clinical outcome depend on the molecular subtypes. Clin Cancer Res 2008;14:5158-65.
11. Ignatiadis M, Singhal SK, Desmedt C, Haibe-Kains B, Criscitiello C, Andre F, et al. Gene modules and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer subtypes: a pooled analysis. J Clin Oncol 2012;30:1996-2004.
12. Sparano JA, Gray RJ, Makower DF, Pritchard KI, Albain KS, Hayes DF, et al. Prospective validation of a 21-gene expression assay in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2015;373:2005-14.
13. Piccart M, Rutgers EJ, van't VeerLJ, Slaets L, Delaloge S, Viale G, et al. Primary analysis of the EORTC 10041/ BIG 3-04 MINDACT study: a prospective, randomized study evaluating the clinical utility of the 70-gene signature (MammaPrint) combined with common clinical-pathological criteria for selection of patients for adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer with 0 to 3 positive nodes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; 2016. Abstract nr CT039.
14. Gatza ML, Lucas JE, Barry WT, Kim JW, Wang Q, Crawford MD, et al. A pathway-based classification of human breast cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010;107:6994-9.
15. Gatza ML, Silva GO, Parker JS, Fan C, Perou CM. An integrated genomics approach identifies drivers of proliferation in luminal-subtype human breast cancer. Nat Genet 2014;46:1051-9.
16. Wolf DM, Lenburg ME, Yau C, Boudreau A, van 't Veer LJ. Gene co-expression modules as clinically relevant hallmarks of breast cancer diversity. PLoS One 2014;9:e88309.
17. NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/
18. ArrayExpress. Available from: http://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/
19. Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, et al. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 2003;4:249-64.
20. Sims AH, Smethurst GJ, Hey Y, Okoniewski MJ, Pepper SD, Howell A, et al. The removal of multiplicative, systematic bias allows integration of breast cancer gene expression datasets - improving meta-analysis and prediction of prognosis. BMC Med Genomics 2008;1:42.
21. UNC Microarray Database. Available from: https://genome.unc.edu/pubsup/breastGEO/
22. Haibe-Kains B, Desmedt C, Loi S, Culhane AC, Bontempi G, Quackenbush J, et al. A three-gene model to robustly identify breast cancer molecular subtypes. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012;104:311-25.
23. TNBCtype: A Subtyping Tool for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer. Available from: http://cbc.mc.vanderbilt.edu/tnbc/
24. Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Chen X, Sanders ME, Chakravarthy AB, Shyr Y, et al. Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest 2011;121:2750-67.
25. Chen X, Li J, Gray WH, Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Shyr Y, et al. TNBCtype: a subtyping tool for triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Inform 2012;11:147-56.
26. Yoshihara K, Shahmoradgoli M, Martinez E, Vegesna R, Kim H, Torres-Garcia W, et al. Inferring tumour purity and stromal and immune cell admixture from expression data. Nat Commun 2013;4:2612.
27. Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: a knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:15545-50.
28. Culhane AC, Schroder MS, Sultana R, Picard SC, Martinelli EN, Kelly C, et al. GeneSigDB: a manually curated database and resource for analysis of gene expression signatures. Nucleic Acids Res 2012;40:D1060-6.
29. Schmelzle T, Mailleux AA, Overholtzer M, Carroll JS, Solimini NL, Lightcap ES, et al. Functional role and oncogene-regulated expression of the BH3-only factor Bmf in mammary epithelial anoikis and morphogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:3787-92.
30. Worster DT, Schmelzle T, Solimini NL, Lightcap ES, Millard B, Mills GB, et al. Akt and ERK control the proliferative response of mammary epithelial cells to the growth factors IGF-1 and EGF through the cell cycle inhibitor p57Kip2. Sci Signal 2012;5:ra19.
31. Venet D, Dumont JE, Detours V. Most random gene expression signatures are significantly associated with breast cancer outcome. PLoS Comput Biol 2011;7:e1002240.
32. Nielsen TO, Parker JS, Leung S, Voduc D, Ebbert M, Vickery T, et al. A comparison of PAM50 intrinsic subtyping with immunohistochemistry and clinical prognostic factors in tamoxifen-treated estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2010;16:5222-32.
33. Hulsen T, de Vlieg J, Alkema W. BioVenn - a web application for the comparison and visualization of biological lists using area-proportional Venn diagrams. BMC Genomics 2008;9:488.
34. Denkert C, von Minckwitz G, Brase JC, Sinn BV, Gade S, Kronenwett R, et al. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without carboplatin in human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive and triple-negative primary breast cancers. J Clin Oncol 2015;33:983-91.
35. Smyth GK, Michaud J, Scott HS. Use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 2005;21:2067-75.
36. Wirapati P, Sotiriou C, Kunkel S, Farmer P, Pradervand S, Haibe-Kains B, et al. Meta-analysis of gene expression profiles in breast cancer: toward a unified understanding of breast cancer subtyping and prognosis signatures. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10:R65.
37. Rody A, Holtrich U, Pusztai L, Liedtke C, Gaetje R, Ruckhaeberle E, et al. T- cell metagene predicts a favorable prognosis in estrogen receptor-negative and HER2-positive breast cancers. Breast Cancer Res 2009;11:R15.
38. Hatzis C, Pusztai L, Valero V, Booser DJ, Esserman L, Lluch A, et al. A genomic predictor of response and survival following taxane-anthracycline chemotherapy for invasive breast cancer. JAMA 2011;305:1873-81.
39. Saal LH, Johansson P, Holm K, Gruvberger-Saal SK, She QB, Maurer M, et al. Poor prognosis in carcinoma is associated with a gene expression signature of aberrant PTEN tumor suppressor pathway activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007;104:7564-9.
40. Lim E, Vaillant F, Wu D, Forrest NC, Pal B, Hart AH, et al. Aberrant luminal progenitors as the candidate target population for basal tumor development in BRCA1 mutation carriers. Nat Med 2009;15:907-13.
41. Teschendorff AE, Miremadi A, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Caldas C. An immune response gene expression module identifies a good prognosis subtype in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer. Genome Biol 2007;8:R157.
42. Philips FS, Schwartz HS, Sternberg SS. Pharmacology of mitomycin C I. toxicity and pathologic effects. Cancer Res 1960;20:1354-61.
43. Smith WW, Wilson SM, Fred SS. Kinetics of stem cell depletion and proliferation: effects of vinblastine and vincristine in normal and irradiated mice. J Natl Cancer Inst 1968;40:847-54.
44. Prat A, Lluch A, Albanell J, Barry WT, Fan C, Chacon JI, et al. Predicting response and survival in chemotherapy-treated triple-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer 2014;111:1532-41.
45. Prat A, Galvan P, Jimenez B, Buckingham W, Jeiranian HA, Schaper C, et al. Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy using core needle biopsy samples with the prosigna assay. Clin Cancer Res 2016;22:560-6.
46. Liu MC, Pitcher BN, Mardis E, Davies S, Friedman PN, Snider JE, et al. PAM50 gene signatures and breast cancer prognosis with adjuvant anthracycline- and taxane-based chemotherapy: correlative analysis of C9741 (Alliance). Breast Cancer 2016;2:15023.
47. Paik S, Shak S, Tang G, Kim C, Baker J, Cronin M, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2004;351:2817-26.
48. van't Veer LJ, Bernards R. Enabling personalized cancer medicine through analysis of gene-expression patterns. Nature 2008;452:564-70.
49. Loi S, Sirtaine N, Piette F, Salgado R, Viale G, Van Eenoo F, et al. Prognostic and predictive value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in a phase III randomized adjuvant breast cancer trial in node-positive breast cancer comparing the addition of docetaxel to doxorubicin with doxorubicin-based chemotherapy: BIG 02-98. J Clin Oncol 2013;31:860-7.
50. Denkert C, Loibl S, Noske A, Roller M, Muller BM, Komor M, et al. Tumor-associated lymphocytes as an independent predictor of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:105-13.
51. Martin M, Prat A, Rodriguez-Lescure A, Caballero R, Ebbert MT, Munarriz B, et al. PAM50 proliferation score as a predictor of weekly paclitaxel benefit in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;138:457-66.
52. Andre F, Arnedos M, Goubar A, Ghouadni A, Delaloge S. Ki67-no evidence for its use in node-positive breast cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2015;12:296-301.
53. Andre F, Khalil A, Slimane K, Massard C, Mathieu MC, Vignot S, et al. Mitotic index and benefit of adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23:2996-3000.
54. Chakravarthy AB, Kelley MC, McLaren B, Truica CI, Billheimer D, Mayer IA, et al. Neoadjuvant concurrent paclitaxel and radiation in stage II/III breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 2006;12:1570-6.
55. Burcombe R, Wilson GD, Dowsett M, Khan I, Richman PI, Daley F, et al. Evaluation of Ki-67 proliferation and apoptotic index before, during and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2006;8:R31.
56. Balko JM, Giltnane JM, Wang K, Schwarz LJ, Young CD, Cook RS, et al. Molecular profiling of the residual disease of triple-negative breast cancers after neoadjuvant chemotherapy identifies actionable therapeutic targets. Cancer Discov 2014;4:232-45.
57. Cancer Genome Atlas N. Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours. Nature 2012;490:61-70.
58. Shah SP, Roth A, Goya R, Oloumi A, Ha G, Zhao Y, et al. The clonal and mutational evolution spectrum of primary triple-negative breast cancers. Nature 2012;486:395-9.
59. Ogston KN, Miller ID, Payne S, Hutcheon AW, Sarkar TK, Smith I, et al. A new histological grading system to assess response of breast cancers to primary chemotherapy: prognostic significance and survival. Breast 2003;12:320-7.
60. Symmans WF, Peintinger F, Hatzis C, Rajan R, Kuerer H, Valero V, et al. Measurement of residual breast cancer burden to predict survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 2007;25:4414-22.