An approach to the prioritization of sustainable maintenance drivers in the TBL framework

IFAC-PapersOnLine

Volumn 49, Issue 28, 2016, Pages 150-155

  Pires, S P ^a   Senechal O ^a   Loures, E F R ^b   Jimenez, J F ^c  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE VALENCIENNES   (France)

^b PONTIFICAL CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^c PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD JAVERIANA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

AHP; GRI; maintenance; OEE; sustainable performance; Triple Bottom Line

Indexed keywords

HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; MAINTENANCE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHICAL PROCESS; EVALUATION AND IMPROVEMENT; GLOBAL REPORTING INITIATIVE; OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCIES; OVERALL EQUIPMENT EFFECTIVENESS; SUSTAINABLE MAINTENANCE; SUSTAINABLE PERFORMANCE; TRIPLE BOTTOM LINE;

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 85006380701     PISSN: None     EISSN: 24058963     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.11.026     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Ahuja, I.P.S., Khamba, J.S., Total productive maintenance: literature review and directions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 25:7 (2008), 709–756.
2. Ajukumar, V.N., Gandhi, O.P., Evaluation of green maintenance initiatives in design and development of mechanical systems using an integrated approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 51 (2013), 34–46.
3. Almeanazel, O.T.R., Total Productive Maintenance Review and Overall Equipment. Jordan Journal of MMechanical and Industrial Engineering 4:4 (2010), 517–522.
4. de Almeida, A.T., Ferreira, R.J.P., Cavalcante, C.a.V., A review of the use of multicriteria and multi- objective models in maintenance and reliability. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 26:3 (2015), 249–271.
5. Büyüközkan, G., Çifçi, G., A novel fuzzy multi-criteria decision framework for sustainable supplier selection with incomplete information. Computers in Industry 62:2 (2011), 164–174.
6. Chiang, Y.H., et al. The nexus among employment opportunities, life-cycle costs, and carbon emissions: A case study of sustainable building maintenance in Hong Kong. Journal of Cleaner Production 109 (2014), 326–335.
7. Domingo, R., Aguado, S., Overall environmental equipment effectiveness as a metric of a lean and green manufacturing system. Sustainability (Switzerland) 7:7 (2015), 9031–9047.
8. Erdoğmuş, Ş., Kapanoglu, M., Koç, E., Evaluating high-tech alternatives by using analytic network process with BOCR and multiactors. Evaluation and Program Planning 28:4 (2005), 391–399.
9. Garza-Reys, J.A., et al. Overall equipment effectiveness (OEE) and process capability (PC) measures: A relationship analysis. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 27:1 (2010), 48–62.
10. Gimenez, C, Sierra, V., Rodon, J., Sustainable operations: Their impact on the triple bottom line. International Journal of Production Economics 140:1 (2012), 149–159.
11. Govindan, K., et al. Barriers analysis for green supply chain management implementation in Indian industries using analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Production Economics 147 (2014), 555–568.
12. Hassini, E., Surti, C., Searcy, C, A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics. International Journal of Production Economics 140:1 (2012), 69–82.
13. Iung, B., Levrat, E., Advanced Maintenance Services for Promoting Sustainability. Procedia CIRP 22 (2014), 15–22.
14. Juuso, E.K., Lahdelma, S., Intelligent Performance Measures For Condition-Based Maintenance. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 19:3 (2013), 278–294.
15. Kumar, U., et al. Maintenance performance metrics: a state-of-the-art review. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 19:3 (2013), 233–277.
16. Liao, Y.X., et al. A Novel Approach for Ontological Representation of Analytic Hierarchy Process. Advanced Materials Research 988:March 2016 (2014), 675–682.
17. Marimon, F., et al. The worldwide diffusion of the global reporting initiative: What is the point?. Journal of Cleaner Production 33 (2012), 132–144.
18. Pires, S.P., et al., 2015. Industrial maintenance for sustainable performance: a systematic literature review. In The 23 rd International Conference on Production Research.
19. Pohekar, S.D., Ramachandran, M., Application of multi-criteria decision making to sustainable energy planning - A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 8:4 (2004), 365–381.
20. Rezaei, J., A Systematic Review of Multi-criteria Decision-making Applications in Reverse Logistics. Transportation Research Procedia 10:July (2015), 766–776.
21. Salvado, M.F., et al. Proposal of a sustainability index for the automotive industry. Sustainability 7:2 (2015), 2113–2144.
22. Sari, E., Sustainable Maintenance Performance Measures: A Pilot Survey in Malaysian Automotive Companies. Procedia CIRP 26 (2015), 443–448.
23. Sharma, A., Yadava, G.S., Deshmukh, S.G., A literature review and future perspectives on maintenance optimization. Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering 17:1 (2011), 5–25.
24. Singh, R.K., et al. An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecological Indicators 15:1 (2009), 281–299.
25. Takata, S., et al. Maintenance: Changing Role in Life Cycle Management. Keynote paper CIRP annals 53:2 (2004), 643–655.
26. Wan Mahmood, W.H., Abdullah, I., Md Fauadi, M.H.F., Translating OEE Measure into Manufacturing Sustainability. Applied Mechanics and Materials 761 (2015), 555–559.
27. Wijnmalen, D.J.D., Analysis of benefits, opportunities, costs, and risks (BOCR) with the AHP-ANP: A critical validation. Mathematical and Computer Modelling 46:7-8 (2007), 892–905.
28. Ye, X., et al. Optimal maintenance planning for sustainable energy efficiency lighting retrofit projects by a control system approach. Control Engineering Practice, 2015, 1–10.