High-definition vs. Standard-definition endoscopy with indigo carmine for the in vivo diagnosis of colonic polyps

United European Gastroenterology Journal

Volumn 1, Issue 6, 2013, Pages 425-429

  Longcroft Wheaton, Gaius ^a,b   Brown, James ^b   Cowlishaw, David ^a   Higgins, Bernard ^b   Bhandari, Pradeep ^a,b  

^a QUEEN ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Colonic polyp; In vivo diagnosis; Indigo carmine

Indexed keywords

INDIGO CARMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CHROMOENDOSCOPY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON POLYP; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; ENDOSCOPY; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; IN VIVO STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 85006190511     PISSN: 20506406     EISSN: 20506414     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/2050640613502963     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Kato S, Fujii T, Koba I, et al. Assessment of colorectal lesions using magnifing colonoscopy and mucosal dye spraying: Can significant lesions be distinguished? Endoscopy 2001; 33: 306–310.
2. Fu KL, Sano Y, Kato S, et al. Chromoendoscopy using indigo carmine dye spraying with magnifying observation is the most reliable method for differential diagnosis between non-neoplastic and neoplastic colorectal lesions: A prospective study. Endoscopy 2004; 36: 1089–1093.
3. Rex D, Kahl C, O’Brien M, et al. The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminuitive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 2011; 73: 419–422.
4. Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ and Rex DK. A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastrienterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 865–869.
5. Kessler WR, Imperiale TF, Klein RW, et al. A quantitative assessment of the risks and cost savings of forgoing histologic examination of diminuitive polyps. Endoscopy 2011; 43: 683–691.
6. Longcroft-Wheaton GR, Higgins B and Bhandari P. Flexible spectral imaging color enhancement and indigo carmine in neoplasia diagnosis during colonoscopy: A large prospective UK series. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 23: 903–911.
7. Longcroft-Wheaton G, Brown J, Cowlishaw D, et al. High definition vs. standard definition colonoscopy in the characterization of small colonic polyps: Results from a randomized trial. Endoscopy 2012; 44: 905–910.
8. Elsen GM, Kim CY, Fleischer DE, et al. High-resolution chromoendoscopy for classifying colonic polyps: a multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2002; 55: 687–694.
9. Kudo S, Tamura S, Nakajima T, et al. Diagnosis of colorectal tumourous lesions by magnifying endoscopy. Gastrointest Enodsc 1996; 44: 8–14.
10. Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ, et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate to high risk groups. Gut 2010; 59: 666–689.
11. Davila RE, Rajan E, Baron TH, et al. ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc 2006; 63: 546–557.
12. Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG, et al. Highdefinition colonoscopy detects colorectal polyps at a higher rate than standard white-light colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8: 364–370.
13. Burke CA, Choure AG, Sanaka MR, et al. A comparison of high-definition versus conventional colonoscopes for polyp detection. Dig Dis Sci 2010; 55: 1716–1720.
14. East JE, Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S, et al. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008; 28: 768–776.
15. Tribonias G, Theodoropoulou A, Konstantinidis K, et al. Comparison of standard vs. high-definition, wide-angle colonoscopy for polyp detection: A randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 2010; 12(10 Online): e260–e266.