High-definition vsstandard-definition colonoscopy in the characterization of small colonic polyps: Results from a randomized trial

Endoscopy

Volumn 44, Issue 10, 2012, Pages 905-910

  Longcroft Wheaton, G ^a   Brown, J ^b   Cowlishaw, D ^a   Higgins, B ^b   Bhandari, P ^a  

^a QUEEN ALEXANDRA HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PORTSMOUTH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPE; COLONOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFIDENCE INTERVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FLEXIBLE SPECTRAL IMAGING COLOR ENHANCEMENT; HIGH DEFINITION COLONOSCOPY; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; IN VIVO STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; WHITE LIGHT ENDOSCOPY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE;

AGED; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOSCOPES; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84866395804     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1310004     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Ignjatovic A, East J, Suzuki N et al. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect Inspect Characterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncology: 2009; 10 1171 1178
2. Pohl J, Nguyen-Tat M, Pech O et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of small colorectal lesions: a prospective comparative study. Am J Gastroenterol: 2008; 103 562 569
3. Pohl J, Lotterer E, Balzer C et al. Computed virtual chromoendoscopy versus standard colonoscopy with targeted indigocarmine chromoscopy: a randomised multicentre trial. Gut: 2009; 58 73 78
4. Togashi K, Osawa H, Koinuma K et al. Comparison of conventional endoscopy, chromoendoscopy, and the optimal-band imaging system for the differentiation of neoplastic and non-neoplastic colonic polyps. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 69 03 734 741
5. Teixeira CR, Torresini RS, Canali C et al. Endoscopic classification of the capillary-vessel pattern of colorectal lesions by spectral estimation technology and magnifying zoom imaging. Gastrointest Endosc: 2009; 69 750 756
6. Hassan C, Pickhardt P, Rex D. A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2010; 8 865 869
7. Rex DK, Kahi C, OBrien M et al. The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy PIVI (Preservation and Incorporation of Valuable Endoscopic Innovations) on real-time endoscopic assessment of the histology of diminutive colorectal polyps. Gastrointest Endosc: 2011; 73 419 422
8. Cairns SR, Scholefield JH, Steele RJ et al. Guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance in moderate and high risk groups. Gut: 2010; 59 666 689
9. Davila R, Rajan E, Baron T et al. ASGE guideline: colorectal cancer screening and surveillance. Gastrointest Endosc: 2006; 63 546 557
10. Participants of the Paris workshop The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc: 2003; 58 3 43
11. Longcroft-Wheaton GR, Higgins B, Bhandari P. Flexible spectral imaging color enhancement and indigo carmine in neoplasia diagnosis during colonoscopy: a large prospective UK series. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol: 2011; 23 903 911
12. Gunnam R. Global endoscopes pipeline analysis, opportunity assessment and market forecasts to 2016. 2010; GDME0004MAR globaldata.com