Patient engagement: What partnering with patient in research is all about

Thrombosis Research

Volumn 150, Issue , 2017, Pages 113-120

  Duffett, Lisa ^a  

^a OTTAWA HOSPITAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Clinical trials; Engagement; Patient centred care; Patients; Research

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION STUDY; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PATIENT ENGAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SELECTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); COMPLICATION; PROCEDURES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM;

EID: 85005808132     PISSN: 00493848     EISSN: 18792472     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.thromres.2016.10.029     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. [1] Richards, T., Montori, V.M., Godlee, F., Lapsley, P., Paul, D., Let the patient revolution begin. BMJ, 346, 2013, f2614.
2. [2] World Health Organization Declaration of Alma-Ata. http://www.who.int/en/ (accessed on July 3, 2016).
3. [3] Laine, C., Davidoff, F., Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA 275:2 (1996), 152–156.
4. [4] Lipkin, M., Shared decision making. JAMA Intern. Med. 173:13 (2013), 1204–1205.
5. [5] Boivin, A., Lehoux, P., Lacombe, R., Burgers, J., Grol, R., Involving patients in setting priorities for healthcare improvement: a cluster randomized trial. Implement. Sci., 9, 2014, 24.
6. [6] van der Weijden, T., Pieterse, A.H., Koelewijn-van Loon, M.S., Knaapen, L., Legare, F., Boivin, A., Burgers, J.S., Stiggelbout, A.M., Faber, M., Elwyn, G., How can clinical practice guidelines be adapted to facilitate shared decision making? A qualitative key-informant study. BMJ Qual. Saf. 22:10 (2013), 855–863.
7. [7] MacLean, S., Mulla, S., Akl, E.A., Jankowski, M., Vandvik, P.O., Ebrahim, S., McLeod, S., Bhatnagar, N., Guyatt, G.H., Patient values and preferences in decision making for antithrombotic therapy: a systematic review: antithrombotic therapy and prevention of thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. Chest 141:2 Suppl (2012), e1S–23S.
8. [8] Domecq, J.P., Prutsky, G., Elraiyah, T., Wang, Z., Nabhan, M., Shippee, N., Brito, J.P., Boehmer, K., Hasan, R., Firwana, B., Erwin, P., Eton, D., Sloan, J., Montori, V., Asi, N., Dabrh, A.M., Murad, M.H., Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv. Res., 14, 2014, 89.
9. [9] Nilsen, P., Hudson, D., Gabrielsson, F., Lindqvist, K., Strategies and goals of community-based injury prevention programmes–a mixed-methods study of 25 Scandinavian WHO Safe Communities. Int. J. Inj. Control Saf. Promot. 13:1 (2006), 27–33.
10. [10] Sacristan, J.A., Aguaron, A., Avendano-Sola, C., Garrido, P., Carrion, J., Gutierrez, A., Kroes, R., Flores, A., Patient involvement in clinical research: why, when, and how. Patient Prefer Adherence 10 (2016), 631–640.
11. [11] Shippee, N.D., Domecq Garces, J.P., Prutsky Lopez, G.J., Wang, Z., Elraiyah, T.A., Nabhan, M., Brito, J.P., Boehmer, K., Hasan, R., Firwana, B., Erwin, P.J., Montori, V.M., Murad, M.H., Patient and service user engagement in research: a systematic review and synthesized framework. Health Expect. 18:5 (2013), 1151–1166.
12. [12] Dentzer, S., Rx for the ‘blockbuster drug’ of patient engagement. Health Aff (Millwood), 32(2), 2013, 202.
13. [13] Hewlett, S., Wit, M., Richards, P., Quest, E., Hughes, R., Heiberg, T., Kirwan, J., Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Rheum. 55:4 (2006), 676–680.
14. [14] Sox, H.C., Greenfield, S., Comparative effectiveness research: a report from the Institute of Medicine. Ann. Intern. Med. 151:3 (2009), 203–205.
15. [15] Fleurence, R., Selby, J.V., Odom-Walker, K., Hunt, G., Meltzer, D., Slutsky, J.R., Yancy, C., How the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute is engaging patients and others in shaping its research agenda. Health Aff (Millwood) 32:2 (2013), 393–400.
16. [16] PCORI (Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute) Methodology Committee, The PCORI Methodology Report. http://pcori.org/research-we-support/research-methodology-standards, 2013 (accessed on July 7, 2016).
17. [17] Tinetti, M.E., Studenski, S.A., Comparative effectiveness research and patients with multiple chronic conditions. N. Engl. J. Med. 364:26 (2011), 2478–2481.
18. [18] Chalmers, I., Glasziou, P., Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet 374:9683 (2009), 86–89.
19. [19] Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research (SPOR) Patient Engagement Framework. Putting Patients First. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/spor_framework-en.pdf (accessed on July 7, 2016).
20. [20] INVOLVE, Developing Training and Support for Public Involvement in Research. 2012, INVOLVE, Eastleigh.
21. [21] PCORI Engagement Rubric, PCORI (Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute), http://www.pcori.org/sites/default/files/Engagement-Rubric.pdf (accessed on July 7, 2016).
22. [22] CIHR's Citizen Engagement Handbook. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/documents/ce_handbook_e.pdf (Accessed on July 1, 2016).
23. [23] Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), http://www.pcori.org/funding-opportunities/what-we-mean-engagement/pcoris-stakeholders (accessed on July 7, 2016).
24. [24] INVOLVE Deliberative Public Engagement: Nine Principles. http://www.involve.org.uk//wp-content/uploads/2011/03/Deliberative-public-engagement-nine-principles.pdf (accessed on July 7, 2016).
25. [25] Hayes HBSTM, Involve, Briefing Notes for Researchers: Involving the Public in NHS, Public Health and Social Care Research. 2012, 2012.
26. [26] Carman, K.L., Workman, T.A., Engaging patients and consumers in research evidence: applying the conceptual model of patient and family engagement. Patient Educ. Couns., 2016.
27. [27] Health Innovation Report. Raising the Bar on Health System Performance, Report #8: Patients as Partners. http://www.healthinnovationforum.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Patients-as-partners_2015.pdf (accessed on July 7, 2016).
28. [28] Elberse, J.E., Caron-Flinterman, J.F., Broerse, J.E., Patient-expert partnerships in research: how to stimulate inclusion of patient perspectives. Health Expect. 14:3 (2011), 225–239.
29. [29] Delbanco, T., Berwick, D.M., Boufford, J.I., Edgman-Levitan, S., Ollenschlager, G., Plamping, D., Rockefeller, R.G., Healthcare in a land called PeoplePower: nothing about me without me. Health Expect. 4:3 (2001), 144–150.
30. [30] Barber, R., Boote, J.D., Parry, G.D., Cooper, C.L., Yeeles, P., Cook, S., Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study. Health Expect. 15:3 (2011), 229–241.
31. [31] Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Mockford, C., Barber, R., The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int. J. Technol. Assess. Health Care 27:4 (2011), 391–399.
32. [32] Brett, J., Staniszewska, S., Mockford, C., Herron-Marx, S., Hughes, J., Tysall, C., Suleman, R., Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect. 17:5 (2012), 637–650.
33. [33] Concannon, T.W., Fuster, M., Saunders, T., Patel, K., Wong, J.B., Leslie, L.K., Lau, J., A systematic review of stakeholder engagement in comparative effectiveness and patient-centered outcomes research. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 29:12 (2014), 1692–1701.
34. [34] Boote, J., Baird, W., Beecroft, C., Public involvement at the design stage of primary health research: a narrative review of case examples. Health Policy 95:1 (2010), 10–23.
35. [35] Nilsen, E.S., Myrhaug, H.T., Johansen, M., Oliver, S., Oxman, A.D., Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev., 3, 2006, CD004563.
36. [36] Oliver, S., Clarke-Jones, L., Rees, R., Milne, R., Buchanan, P., Gabbay, J., Gyte, G., Oakley, A., Stein, K., Involving consumers in research and development agenda setting for the NHS: developing an evidence-based approach. Health Technol. Assess. 8:15 (2004), 1–IV.
37. [37] Wilson, P., Mathie, E., Keenan, J., McNeilly, E., Goodman, C., Howe, A., et al. ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: a RealisT evaluation – the RAPPORT study. Health Services and Delivery Research, 3(38), 2015.
38. [38] Forsythe, L.P., Ellis, L.E., Edmundson, L., Sabharwal, R., Rein, A., Konopka, K., Frank, L., Patient and stakeholder engagement in the PCORI pilot projects: description and lessons learned. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 31:1 (2015), 13–21.
39. [39] Williamson, T.B.J.R.J., Impact of public involvement in research on quality of life and society: a case study of research career trajectories. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 34 (2010), 551–557.
40. [40] Langston, A.L., McCallum, M., Campbell, M.K., Robertson, C., Ralston, S.H., An integrated approach to consumer representation and involvement in a multicentre randomized controlled trial. Clin. Trials 2:1 (2005), 80–87.
41. [41] Carman, K.L., Dardess, P., Maurer, M., Sofaer, S., Adams, K., Bechtel, C., Sweeney, J., Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff (Millwood) 32:2 (2013), 223–231.
42. [42] Telford, R., Boote, J.D., Cooper, C.L., What does it mean to involve consumers successfully in NHS research? A consensus study. Health Expect. 7:3 (2004), 209–220.
43. [43] Hysong, S.J., Woodard, L., Garvin, J.H., Murawsky, J., Petersen, L.A., Publishing protocols for partnered research. J. Gen. Intern. Med. 29:Suppl. 4 (2014), 820–824.
44. [44] King, G., Servais, M., Currie, M., Measuring the Community Impacts of Research Orientated Partnerships. http://www.impactmeasure.org (accessed on June 23, 2016).
45. [45] Gamble C, Dudley L, Allam A, Bell P, Buck D, Goodare H, Hanley B, Preston J, Walker A, Williamson PR, Young B. 2015.
46. [46] Mental Health Research Network and INVOLVE, Budgeting for Involvement: Practical Advice on Budgeting for Actively Involving? The Public in Research Studies. 2013, Mental Health Research Network, London and INVOLVE, Eastleigh.
47. [47] Staley, K., ‘Is it worth doing?’ Measuring the impact of patient and public involvement in research. BioMed Central 1:6 (2015), 1–10.
48. [48] Morrow, E.R.F.G.P.B.J., A model and measure for quality service user involvement in health research. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 34 (2010), 532–539.
49. [49] Stocks, S.J., Giles, S.J., Cheraghi-Sohi, S., Campbell, S.M., Application of a tool for the evaluation of public and patient involvement in research. BMJ Open, 5(3), 2015, e006390.
50. [50] Kirwan, J., Heiberg, T., Hewlett, S., Hughes, R., Kvien, T., Ahlmen, M., Boers, M., Minnock, P., Saag, K., Shea, B., Suarez, A.M., Taal, E., Outcomes from the Patient Perspective Workshop at OMERACT 6. J. Rheumatol. 30:4 (2003), 868–872.
51. [51] OMERACT, Outcomes Measures in Rheumatology. http://www.omeract.org/patient_research_partners.html (accessed on July 4, 2016).
52. [52] Langston, A.L., Campbell, M.K., Fraser, W.D., MacLennan, G.S., Selby, P.L., Ralston, S.H., Randomized trial of intensive bisphosphonate treatment versus symptomatic management in Paget's disease of bone. J. Bone Miner. Res. 25:1 (2010), 20–31.
53. [53] James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership Guidebook. http://www.jla.nihr.ac.uk/jla-guidebook/ (accessed on July 4, 2016).
54. [54] National Priorities for Research and Research Agenda. PCORI. http://www.pcori.rog/sites/default/files/PCORI-National-Priorities-and-Research-Agenda.pdf, 2016.
55. [55] The British Medical Journal, Guidance for BMJ Patient Reviewers. http://www.bmj.com/about-bmj/resources-reviewers/guidance-patient-reviewers (accessed on July 7, 2016).
56. [56] Patients Like Me. https://www.patientslikeme.com (accessed on July 7, 2016).
57. [57] Kaatz, S., Ahmad, D., Spyropoulos, A.C., Schulman, S., Definition of clinically relevant non-major bleeding in studies of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in non-surgical patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J. Thromb. Haemost. 13:11 (2015), 2119–2126.
58. [58] Lancaster, T.R., Singer, D.E., Sheehan, M.A., Oertel, L.B., Maraventano, S.W., Hughes, R.A., Kistler, J.P., The impact of long-term warfarin therapy on quality of life. Evidence from a randomized trial. Boston Area Anticoagulation Trial for Atrial Fibrillation Investigators. Arch. Intern. Med. 151:10 (1991), 1944–1949.
59. [59] Klok, F.A., van Kralingen, K.W., van Dijk, A.P., Heyning, F.H., Vliegen, H.W., Kaptein, A.A., Huisman, M.V., Quality of life in long-term survivors of acute pulmonary embolism. Chest 138:6 (2010), 1432–1440.
60. [60] EJ, v., PL, d.E., AA, K., CD, A., PM, E., FA, K., RA, D., IC, M., DM, C., PW, K., MV, H., Middeldorp, S., Quality of life after pulmonary embolism as assessed with SF-36 and PEmb-QoL. Thromb. Res. 132:5 (2013), 500–505.
61. [61] Lukas, P.S., Krummenacher, R., Biasiutti, F.D., Begre, S., Znoj, H., von Känel, R., Association of fatigue and psychological distress with quality of life in patients with a previous venous thromboembolic event. Thromb. Haemost. 102:6 (2009), 1219–1226.
62. [62] Kahn, S.R., Shbaklo, H., Lamping, D.L., Holcroft, C.A., Shrier, I., Miron, M.J., Roussin, A., Desmarais, S., Joyal, F., Kassis, J., Solymoss, S., Desjardins, L., Johri, M., Ginsberg, J.S., Determinants of health-related quality of life during the 2 years following deep vein thrombosis. J. Thromb. Haemost. 6:7 (2008), 1105–1112.
63. [63] Noble, S., Lewis, R., Whithers, J., Lewis, S., Bennett, P., Long-term psychological consequences of symptomatic pulmonary embolism: a qualitative study. BMJ Open, 4(4), 2014, e004561.
64. [64] Noble, S., Prout, H., Nelson, A., Patients’ Experiences of LIving with CANcer-associated thrombosis: the PELICAN study. Patient Prefer Adherence 9 (2015), 337–345.
65. [65] Seaman, S., Nelson, A., Noble, S., Cancer-associated thrombosis, low-molecular-weight heparin, and the patient experience: a qualitative study. Patient Prefer Adherence 8 (2014), 453–461.