Application of a tool for the evaluation of public and patient involvement in research

BMJ Open

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Stocks, Susan Jill ^a   Giles, Sally J ^a   Cheraghi Sohi, Sudeh ^a   Cab, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EXPECTATION; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; LIKERT SCALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT SAFETY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PUBLIC AND PATIENT INVOLVEMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE; TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH; COOPERATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PERSONNEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; TRANSLATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84926512767     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006390     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR). Public and Patient Involvement. http://www.nihr.ac.uk/funding/public-involvement-in-your-research.htm (accessed Jul 2014).
2. Boote J, Wong R, Booth A. "Talking the talk or walking the walk?" A bibliometric review of the literature on public involvement in health research published between 1995 and 2009. Health Expect 2015;18:44-57.
3. Rose D. Patient and public involvement in health research: ethical imperative and/or radical challenge? J Health Psychol 2014;19:149-58.
4. NIHR Greater Manchester Primary Care Patient Safety Translational research Centre. http://www.population-health.manchester.ac.uk/primary-care-patient-safety/PPI-PE/ (accessed Jul 2014).
5. Barber R, Boote JD, Parry GD, et al. Can the impact of public involvement on research be evaluated? A mixed methods study. Health Expect 2011;15:229-41.
6. Morrow E, Ross F, Grocott P, et al. A model and measure for quality service user involvement in health research. Int J Consum Stud 2010;34:532-9.
7. INVOLVE policy on payments and expenses for members of the public 2010. http://www.invo.org.uk/posttypeorgpub/involve-policy-on-payments-and-expenses-for-members-of-the-public/. http://www.invo.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/INVOLVEMHRNBudgeting09Jul2013.pdf (accessed Jul 14).
8. Boone HA, Boone DA. Analyzing Likert data. J Extension 2012;50: Article Number 2TOT2. http://www.joe.org/joe/2012april/tt2.php (accessed Jun 2014).
9. Lubke GH, Muthén BO. Applying multigroup confirmatory factor models for continuous outcomes to Likert scale data complicates meaningful group comparisons. Struct Equation Model 2004;11:514-34.
10. Boote J, Barber R, Cooper C. Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis. Health Policy 2006;75:280-97.
11. Gradinger F, Britten N, Wyatt K. Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review. Health Expect 2013. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/hex.12158/full (accessed Dec 13).
12. Popay J, Collins M. eds. PiiAF Study Group, The Public Involvement Impact Assessment Framework Guidance 2014. http://piiaf.org.uk/documents/piiaf-guidance-jan14.pdf (accessed Jan 2015).
13. King G, Servais M, Currie M. The community impacts of research-orientated partnerships (The CIROP Measure). http://www.impactmeasure.org (accessed Jan 2015).
14. Vita S, Coplin H, Feiereisel KB, et al. Decreasing the ceiling effect in assessing meeting quality at an academic professional meeting. Teach Learn Med 2013;25:47-54.