-
1
-
-
77953395873
-
CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials
-
PID: 20335313
-
Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D. CONSORT 2010 statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(11):726–732.
-
(2010)
Ann Intern Med
, vol.152
, Issue.11
, pp. 726-732
-
-
Schulz, K.F.1
Altman, D.G.2
Moher, D.3
-
2
-
-
84922007512
-
-
National Institutes of Health. Why Should I Register and Submit Results? ClinicalTrials.gov. Accessed 2-24-2014
-
National Institutes of Health. Why Should I Register and Submit Results? ClinicalTrials.gov. Accessed 2-24-2014. Available at http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/manage-recs/background.
-
-
-
-
3
-
-
84922007511
-
-
Instructions for Authors. JAMA. Last updated 2-7-2014
-
Instructions for Authors. JAMA. Last updated 2-7-2014. Available at http://jama.jamanetwork.com/public/instructionsForAuthors.aspx.
-
-
-
-
4
-
-
84922007510
-
-
Information for Authors. Ann Intern Med. Last updated 3-4-2014
-
Information for Authors. Ann Intern Med. Last updated 3-4-2014. Available at http://annals.org/public/authorsinfo.aspx.
-
-
-
-
5
-
-
79952603639
-
Comparative effectiveness of goal setting in Diabetes Mellitus group clinics
-
PID: 21403042
-
Naik AD, Palmer N, Petersen NJ, Street RL Jr, Rao R, Suarez-Almazor M, Haidet P. Comparative effectiveness of goal setting in Diabetes Mellitus group clinics. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171(5):453–459.
-
(2011)
Arch Intern Med
, vol.171
, Issue.5
, pp. 453-459
-
-
Naik, A.D.1
Palmer, N.2
Petersen, N.J.3
Street, R.L.J.4
Rao, R.5
Suarez-Almazor, M.6
Haidet, P.7
-
6
-
-
39049172728
-
Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges
-
PID: 18179688
-
Kitson AL, Rycroft-Malone J, Harvey G, McCormack B, Seers K, Titchen A. Evaluating the successful implementation of evidence into practice using the PARiHS framework: theoretical and practical challenges. Implement Sci. 2008;3:1.
-
(2008)
Implement Sci
, vol.3
, pp. 1
-
-
Kitson, A.L.1
Rycroft-Malone, J.2
Harvey, G.3
McCormack, B.4
Seers, K.5
Titchen, A.6
-
8
-
-
78049330002
-
Best practices in the reporting of participatory action research: embracing both the forest and the trees
-
Smith L, Rosenzweig L, Schmidt M. Best practices in the reporting of participatory action research: embracing both the forest and the trees. Couns Psychol. 2010;38(8):1115–1138.
-
(2010)
Couns Psychol
, vol.38
, Issue.8
, pp. 1115-1138
-
-
Smith, L.1
Rosenzweig, L.2
Schmidt, M.3
-
9
-
-
71049119085
-
Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials
-
PID: 19852784
-
Leykum LK, Pugh JA, Lanham HJ, Harmon J, McDaniel RR Jr. Implementation research design: integrating participatory action research into randomized controlled trials. Implement Sci. 2009;4:69.
-
(2009)
Implement Sci
, vol.4
, pp. 69
-
-
Leykum, L.K.1
Pugh, J.A.2
Lanham, H.J.3
Harmon, J.4
McDaniel, R.R.J.5
-
10
-
-
84922007509
-
-
Detry MA, Lewis RJ, Broglio KR, Connor JT, Berry SM, Berry DA. Standards for the design, conduct, and evaluation of adaptive randomized clinical trials. Last updated March 15, 2012. Accessed May 5 2014. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute
-
Detry MA, Lewis RJ, Broglio KR, Connor JT, Berry SM, Berry DA. Standards for the design, conduct, and evaluation of adaptive randomized clinical trials. Last updated March 15, 2012. Accessed May 5 2014. Patient Centered Outcomes Research Institute. Available at http://www.pcori.org/assets/Standards-for-the-Design-Conduct-and-Evaluation-of-Adaptive-Randomized-Clinical-Trials1.pdf.
-
-
-
-
11
-
-
84886876927
-
Do Bayesian adaptive trials offer advantages for comparative effectiveness research? Protocol for the RE-ADAPT study
-
PID: 23983160
-
Connor JT, Luce BR, Broglio KR, Ishak KJ, Mullins CD, Vanness DJ, Fleurence R, Saunders E, Davis BR. Do Bayesian adaptive trials offer advantages for comparative effectiveness research? Protocol for the RE-ADAPT study. Clin Trials. 2013;10(5):807–827. doi:10.1177/1740774513497293.
-
(2013)
Clin Trials
, vol.10
, Issue.5
, pp. 807-827
-
-
Connor, J.T.1
Luce, B.R.2
Broglio, K.R.3
Ishak, K.J.4
Mullins, C.D.5
Vanness, D.J.6
Fleurence, R.7
Saunders, E.8
Davis, B.R.9
-
12
-
-
36549063576
-
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
-
PID: 17872937
-
Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
-
(2007)
Int J Qual Health Care
, vol.19
, Issue.6
, pp. 349-357
-
-
Tong, A.1
Sainsbury, P.2
Craig, J.3
-
13
-
-
84888377256
-
Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting
-
PID: 24289295
-
Proctor EK, Powell BJ, McMillen JC. Implementation strategies: recommendations for specifying and reporting. Implement Sci. 2013;8:139.
-
(2013)
Implement Sci
, vol.8
, pp. 139
-
-
Proctor, E.K.1
Powell, B.J.2
McMillen, J.C.3
-
14
-
-
58849141749
-
-
APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards. Reporting standards for research in psychology: why do we need them? What might they be? Am Psychol. 2008;63(9):839–851
-
APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards. Reporting standards for research in psychology: why do we need them? What might they be? Am Psychol. 2008;63(9):839–851.
-
-
-
|