Homes as machines: Exploring expert and public imaginaries of low carbon housing futures in the United Kingdom

Energy Research and Social Science

Volumn 23, Issue , 2017, Pages 36-45

  Cherry, C ^a   Hopfe, C ^b   MacGillivray, B ^c   Pidgeon, N ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Futures; Imagined publics; Low carbon housing; Socio technical imaginaries

Indexed keywords

EID: 85002131906     PISSN: 22146296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. [1] Akrich, M., The de-scription of technical objects. Bijker, W., Law, J., (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society, 1992, MIT Press, Cambridge, 205–224.
2. [2] Åm, H., The sun also rises in Norway: solar scientists as transition actors. Environ. Innov. Soci. Transit. 16 (2015), 142–153.
3. [3] Ballo, I.F., Imagining energy futures: sociotechnical imaginaries of the future smart grid in Norway. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 9 (2015), 9–20.
4. [4] Barker, Barker Review of Housing Supply, Delivering Stability: Securing Our Future Housing Needs. 2003, HM Treasury, London.
5. [5] Barnett, A., Burningham, K., Walker, G., Cass, N., Imagined publics and engagement around renewable energy technologies in the UK. Public Underst. Sci. 21:1 (2012), 36–50.
6. [6] Bogner, A., Menz, W., The theory-generating expert interview: epistemological interest, forms of knowledge, interaction. Bogner, W.M.A., Littig, B., (eds.) Interviewing Experts, vol. 6, 2009, Palgrave/MacMillan, New York, 1691–1698 pp. 43–80 (8).
7. [7] Brown, N., Rappert, B., Webster, A., (eds.) Contested Futures: A Sociology of Prospective Techno-science, 2000, Ashgate Press, Aldershot.
8. [8] Brown, P., Swan, W., Chahal, S., Retrofitting social housing: reflections by tenants on adopting and living with retrofit technology. Energy Effic. 7:4 (2014), 641–653.
9. [9] Budde, B., Alkemade, F., Weber, K.M., Expectations as a key to understanding actor strategies in the field of fuel cell and hydrogen vehicles. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 79:6 (2012), 1072–1083.
10. [10] CCC, The Fourth Carbon Budget - Reducing Emissions Through the 2020. 2010, Committee on Climate Change, London.
11. [11] CCC, Buildings Factsheet. 2014, Committee on Climate Change, London.
12. [12] Charmaz, K., Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis (Introducing Qualitative Methods Series). 2006, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
13. [13] Cherry, C., Exploring Discourses of Decarbonisation: The Social Construction of Low Carbon Housing. 2015, Cardiff University Ph.D. Thesis Available at orca.cf.ac.uk.
14. [14] Cherry, C., Hopfe, C., MacGillivray, B., Pidgeon, N., Media discourses of low carbon housing: the marginalisation of social and behavioural dimensions within the British broadsheet press. Public Underst. Sci. 24:3 (2015), 302–310.
15. [15] DCLG, The Code for Sustainable Homes: A Step-change in Sustainable Home Building Practice. 2006, Department for Communities and Local Government, London.
16. [16] DCLG, Building a Greener Future: Policy Statement. 2007, Department for Communities and Local Government, London.
17. [17] DCLG, Sustainable New Homes – The Road to Zero Carbon. 2009, Department for Communities and Local Government, London.
18. [18] DECC, Removing the Hassle Factor Associated with Loft Insulation: Results of a Behavioural Trial. 2013, Department for Energy and Climate Change, London.
19. [19] DECC, United Kingdom Housing Energy Fact File: 2013. 2013, Department for Energy and Climate Change, London.
20. [20] Demski, C., Butler, C., Parkhill, K.A., Spence, A., Pidgeon, N.F., Public values for energy system change. Global Environ. Change 34 (2015), 59–69.
21. [21] Devine-Wright, P., Energy citizenship: psychological aspects of evolution in sustainable energy technologies. Gov. Technol. Sustain., 63, 2007.
22. [22] Devine-Wright, P., Renewable Energy and the Public: from NIMBY to Participation. 2013, Routledge.
23. [23] Devine-Wright, P., Wrapson, W., Henshaw, V., Guy, S., Low carbon heating and older adults: comfort, cosiness and glow. Build. Res. Inf. 42:3 (2014), 288–299.
24. [24] EAC, Housing Building a Sustainable Future. 2005, House of Commons, London.
25. [25] Glaser, B., Strauss, A., The Discovery of Grounded Theory. 1967, Weidenfield & Nicolson, London.
26. [26] Groves, C., Henwood, F., Shirani, C., Parkhill, K., Pidgeon, N., The Grit in the Oyster: Questioning Socio-technical Imaginaries Through Biographical Narratives of Engagement with Energy. 2015 in review.
27. [27] Green Alliance, Speech by Yvette Cooper MP, Minister for Housing and Planning. 2006 http://www.green-alliance.org.uk/page_667.php, (Accessed online: 4th February, 2015).
28. [28] Guertler, P., Robson, D., Royston, S., Somewhere between a ‘Comedy of errors’ and ‘As you like it’? A brief history of Britain's ‘Green Deal’ so far. ECEEE Summer Study Proceedings, 2013.
29. [29] Harvard University, Program on Science, Technology and Society (STS), Modernity's Powerful Imaginations, STS Research Platform on Sociotechnical Imaginaries. 2011 Available from: < http://sts.hks.harvard.edu/research/platforms/imaginaries/i.ant/modernitys-powerful-imaginations/> (accessed 7th September, 2016).
30. [30] Hedgecoe, A., Martin, P., The drugs don't work: expectations and the shaping of pharmacogenetics. Soc. Stud. Sci. 33:3 (2003), 327–364.
31. [31] Heidenreich, S., Sublime technology and object of fear: offshore wind scientists assessing publics. Environ. Plann. A 47:5 (2014), 1047–1062.
32. [32] Henwood, K., Pidgeon, N., Qualitative research and psychological theorizing. Br. J. Psychol. 83:1 (1992), 97–111.
33. [33] HM Gov, Stephen Williams Announces Plans to Simplify Housing Standards ? Press Release. 2015 https://www.gov.uk/government/news/stephen-williams-announces-plans-to-raise-housing-standards, (Accessed online: 28th April, 2015).
34. [34] HM Treasury, 2006 Pre-budget Report., 2006, HM Treasury, London.
35. [35] Hopfe, C.J., McLeod, R.S., The Passivhaus Designer's Manual: a Technical Guide to Lows and Zero Energy Buildings. 2015, Routledge, London.
36. [36] Jasanoff, S., Kim, S.-H., Containing the atom: sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva 47:2 (2009), 119–146.
37. [37] Jasanoff, S., Kim, S.−H, Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. 2015, Chicago University press, Chicago.
38. [38] Jelsma, J., Innovating for sustainability: involving users, politics and technology. Innovation 16:2 (2003), 103–116.
39. [39] Kitzinger, J., The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interaction between research participants. Sociol. Health Illn. 16:1 (1994), 103–121.
40. [40] Kleijnen, M., Lee, N., Wetzels, M., An exploration of consumer resistance to innovation and its antecedents. J. Econ. Psychol. 30:3 (2009), 344–357.
41. [41] Kuchler, M., Sweet dreams (are made of cellulose): Sociotechnical imaginaries of second-generation bioenergy in the global debate. Ecol. Econ. 107 (2014), 431–437.
42. [42] Latour, B., Where are the missing massess? The sociology of a few mundane artifacts. Bijker, W., Law, J., (eds.) Shaping Technology/Building Society, 1992, MIT Press, Cambridge, 225–258.
43. [43] Leaman, A., Stevenson, F., Bordass, B., Building evaluation: practice and principles. Build. Res. Inf. 38:5 (2010), 564–577.
44. [44] Lovell, H., Framing sustainable housing as a solution to climate change. J. Environ. Policy Plann. 6:1 (2004), 35–55.
45. [45] Lunt, P., Livingstone, S., Rethinking the focus group in media and communications research. J. Commun. 46:2 (1996), 79–98.
46. [46] Maranta, A., Guggenheim, M., Gisler, P., Pohl, C., The reality of experts and the imagined lay person. Acta Sociol. 46:2 (2003), 150–165.
47. [47] Michael, M., Birke, L., Accounting for animal experiments: identity and disreputable others. Sci. Technol. Hum.Values 19:2 (1994), 189–204.
48. [48] Myers, B., Beck, M., Big brother to switch off your fridge: power giants to make millions – but you must pay for ‘sinister’ technology. Daily Mail, 2013 (April 27).
49. [49] ODPM, Sustainable Communities: Building for the Future. 2003, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister, London.
50. [50] Ozaki, R., Shaw, I., Entangled practices: governance, sustainable technologies and energy consumption. Sociology 48:3 (2014), 590–605.
51. [51] Pickersgill, M., Connecting neuroscience and law: anticipatory discourse and the role of sociotechnical imaginaries. New Genet. Soc. 30:1 (2011), 27–40.
52. [52] Pickvance, C., The construction of UK sustainable housing policy and the role of pressure groups. Local Environ. 14:4 (2009), 329–345.
53. [53] Powell, M., Colin, M., Kleinman, D.L., Delborne, J., Anderson, A., Imagining ordinary citizens? Conceptualized and actual participants for deliberations on emerging technologies. Sci. Cult. 20:1 (2011), 37–70.
54. [54] Sauter, R., Watson, J., Strategies for the deployment of micro-generation: implications for social acceptance. Energy Policy 35:5 (2007), 2770–2779.
55. [55] SBTF, Better Buildings, Better Lives. 2004, Sustainable Buildings Task Force, London.
56. [56] Shove, E., Converging conventions of comfort, cleanliness and convenience. J. Consum. Policy 26:4 (2003), 395–418.
57. [57] Skjølsvold, T.M., Lindkvist, C., Ambivalence, designing users and user imaginaries in the European smart grid: insights from an interdisciplinary demonstration project. Energy Res. Soc. Sci. 9 (2015), 43–50.
58. [58] Skjølsvold, T.M., Back to the futures: retrospecting the prospects of smart grid technology. Futures 63 (2014), 26–36.
59. [59] Smith, E., Imaginaries of development: the Rockefeller Foundation and rice research. Sci. Cult. 18:4 (2009), 461–482.
60. [60] Spence, A., Pidgeon, N., Psychology, climate change & sustainable behaviour. Environ.: Sci. Policy Sustain. Dev. 51:6 (2009), 8–18.
61. [61] Spence, A., Demski, C., Butler, C., Parkhill, K., Pidgeon, N., Public perceptions of demand-side management and a smarter energy future. Nat. Clim. Change 5 (2015), 550–554.
62. [62] Star, S.L., This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept Science. Technol. Hum. Values 35:5 (2010), 601–617.
63. [63] Stevenson, F., Carmona-Andreu, I., Hancock, M., The usability of control interfaces in low-carbon housing. Archit. Sci. Rev. 56:1 (2013), 70–82.
64. [64] Stirling, A., Opening up and closing down power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 33:2 (2008), 262–294.
65. [65] Strauss, A., Corbin, J.M., Grounded Theory in Practice. 1997, Sage, London.
66. [66] Strengers, Y., Smart Energy Technologies in Everyday Life: Smart Utopia?. 2013, Springer.
67. [67] Throndsen, W., What do experts talk about when they talk about users? Expectations and imagined users in the smart grid. Energy Effic., 2016 (available online).
68. [68] UKGBC, Zero Carbon Task Group Report: The Definition of Zero Carbon., 2008, UK Green Building Council, London.
69. [69] Walker, G., Karvonen, A., Guy, S., Zero carbon homes and zero carbon living: sociomaterial interdependencies in carbon governance. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr., 2015 in press.
70. [70] Walker, G., Cass, N., Burningham, K., Barnett, J., Renewable energy and sociotechnical change: imagined subjectivities of ‘the public’ and their implications. Enviro. Plan. A 42:4 (2010), 931–947.
71. [71] Williams, J., Green houses for the growth region. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 51:1 (2008), 107–140.
72. [72] Wilson, C., Hargreaves, T., Hauxwell-Baldwin, R., Smart homes and their users: a systematic analysis and key challenges. Pers. Ubiquitous Comput. 19:2 (2015), 463–476.
73. [73] Wynne, B., Public uptake of science: a case for institutional reflexivity. Public Underst. Sci. 2:4 (1993), 321–337.
74. [74] ZCH, Defining Zero Carbon Homes: ‘Have Your Say’ Report 2009., 2009, Zero Carbon Hub, London.
75. [75] ZCH, Allowable Solutions For Tomorrow's New Homes. 2011, Zero Carbon Hub, London.