Active engagement with stigmatised communities through digital ethnography

Qualitative Research

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 701-719

  Barratt, Monica J ^a,b,c   Maddox, Alexia ^b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c BURNET INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^d DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Big Data; community based research; digital ethnography; digital trace analyses; drug use communities; ethics; illicit activities; stigmatised populations; workflow

Indexed keywords

EID: 85001930506     PISSN: 14687941     EISSN: 17413109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1468794116648766     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Ackland R, (2013) Web Social Science: Concepts, Data and Tools for Social Scientists in the Digital Age. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
2. Adler P, (1990) Ethnographic research on hidden populations: penetrating the drug world. In: Lambert EY, (ed) The Collection and Interpretation of Data from Hidden Populations (NIDA Research Monograph No. 98). Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse, 96–112.
3. Agar MH, (2011) Making sense of one other for another: ethnography as translation. Language and Communication 31(1): 38–47.
4. Aldridge J, Décary-Hétu D, (2014) Not an ‘eBay for drugs’: the cryptomarket ‘Silk Road’ as a paradigm shifting criminal innovation (May 13, 2014). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2436643
5. Anderson EE, DuBois JM, (2007) The need for evidence-based research ethics: a review of the substance abuse literature. Drug and Alcohol Dependence 86(2–3): 95–105.
6. Ayling R, Mewse AJ, (2009) Evaluating Internet interviews with gay men. Qualitative Health Research 19(4): 566–576.
7. Bahn S, (2012) Keeping academic field researchers safe: ethical safeguards. Journal of Academic Ethics 10(2): 83–91.
8. Bakardjieva M, Feenberg A, (2001) Involving the virtual subject. Ethics and Information Technology 2(4): 233–240.
9. Barratt MJ, (2011) Discussing illicit drugs in public internet forums: visibility, stigma, and pseudonymity. In: Kjeldskov J, Paay J, (eds) C&T ‘11. Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Communities and Technologies. New York: ACM, 159–168.
10. Barratt MJ, (2012a) The efficacy of interviewing young drug users through online chat. Drug and Alcohol Review 31(4): 566–572.
11. Barratt MJ, (2012b) Silk Road: eBay for drugs. Letter to the editor. Addiction 107(3): 683.
12. Barratt MJ, Ferris JA, Winstock AR, (2014) Use of Silk Road, the online drug marketplace, in the UK, Australia and the USA. Addiction 109(5): 774–783.
13. Barratt MJ, Lenton S, (2010) Beyond recruitment? Participatory online research with people who use drugs. International Journal of Internet Research Ethics 3(1): 69–86.
14. Barratt MJ, Lenton S, Allen M, (2013) Internet content regulation, public drug websites and the growth in hidden Internet services. Drugs: Education, Prevention, and Policy 20(3): 195–202.
15. Barratt MJ, Potter GR, Wouters M. (2015) Lessons from conducting trans-national Internet-mediated participatory research with hidden populations of cannabis cultivators. International Journal of Drug Policy 26(3): 238–249.
16. Barratt MJ, Maddox A, Lenton S, Allen M, (2016) ‘What if you live on top of a bakery and you like cakes?’ – Exploring the drug use and harm trajectories before, during and after the emergence of Silk Road. International Journal of Drug Policy. Epub ahead of print 16 April 2016. DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2016.04.006.
17. Borisov N, Goldberg I, Brewer E, (2004) Off-the-record communication, or, why not to use PGP. Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Workshop on Privacy in the Electronic Society. Washington, DC.
18. boyd d, Crawford K, (2012) Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication and Society 15(5): 662–679.
19. Bruns A, (2013) Faster than the speed of print: reconciling ‘big data’ social media analysis and academic scholarship. First Monday 18(10).
20. Buckels EE, Trapnell PD, Paulhus DL, (2014) Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences 67: 97–102.
21. Clough A, Conigrave K, (2008) Managing confidentiality in illicit drugs research: ethical and legal lessons from studies in remote Aboriginal communities. Internal Medicine Journal 38(1): 60–63.
22. Coomber R, (2011) Using the internet for qualitative research on drug users and drug markets: The pros, the cons and the progress. In: Fountain J, Frank VA, Korf DJ, (eds) Markets, Methods and Messages. Dynamics in European Drug Research. Lengerich: Pabst Science Publishers, 85–103.
23. Crawford K, (2009) Following you: disciplines of listening in social media. Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies 23(4): 525–535.
24. Creswell JW, Miller DL, (2000) Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory Into Practice 39(3): 124–130.
25. Crowley JE, (2007) Friend or foe? Self-expansion, stigmatized groups, and the researcher-participant relationship. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 36(6): 603–630.
26. Davis M, Bolding G, Hart G, Sherr L, Elford J, (2004) Reflecting on the experience of interviewing online: perspectives from the Internet and HIV study in London. AIDS Care 16(8): 944–952.
27. Décary-Hétu D, Aldridge J, (2015) Sifting through the net: monitoring of online offenders by researchers. European Review on Organised Crime 9(2): 122–141.
28. Dingledine R, Mathewson N, Syverson P, (2004) Tor: the second-generation onion router. SSYM’04 Proceedings of the 13th Conference on USENIX Security Symposium. San Diego, CA.
29. Ekbia H, Mattioli M, Kouper I. (2015) Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical review. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 66(8): 1523–1545.
30. Ess C, (2009) Digital Media Ethics. Cambridge: Polity.
31. Falzon M-A, (2009) Introduction. In: Falzon M-A, (ed) Multi-sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research. Farnham: Ashgate, 1–23.
32. Garrett B, (2014) Place-hacker Bradley Garrett: research at the edge of the law. Times Higher Education, 5 June 2014. Available at https://www.timeshighereducation.com/features/place-hacker-bradley-garrett-research-at-the-edge-of-the-law/2013717.article
33. Gehl RW, (2014) Power/freedom on the dark web: a digital ethnography of the Dark Web Social Network. New Media & Society. Epub ahead of print 15 October 2014. DOI: 10.1177/1461444814554900.
34. Hine C, (2008) Virtual ethnography: modes, varieties, affordances. In: Fielding N, Lee RM, Blank G, (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Online Research Methods. London: SAGE, 257–270.
35. King SA, (1994) Analysis of electronic support groups for recovering addicts. Interpersonal Computing and Technology 2(3): 47–56.
36. Knox C, (2001) Establishing research legitimacy in the contested political ground of contemporary Northern Ireland. Qualitative Research 1(2): 205–222.
37. Koumartzis N, Veglis A, (2011) Internet regulation: the need for more transparent Internet filtering systems and improved measurement of public opinion on Internet filtering. First Monday 16(10).
38. Lee RM, (1993) Doing Research on Sensitive Topics. London: SAGE.
39. Lee RM, (1994) Dangerous Fieldwork. London: SAGE.
40. Loxley W, Hawks D, Bevan J, (1997) Protecting the interests of participants in research into illicit drug use: two case studies. Addiction 92(9): 1081–1086.
41. Lupton D, (2015) Digital Sociology. London: Routledge.
42. Maddox A, Barratt MJ, Allen M, Lenton S, (2016) Constructive activism in the dark web: cryptomarkets and illicit drugs in the digital ‘demimonde’. Information, Communication and Society 19(1): 111–126.
43. Marcus GE, (1995) Ethnography in/of the world system: the emergence of multi-sited ethnography. Annual Review of Anthropology 24: 95–117.
44. Markham AN, (2005) The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln VS, (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. London: SAGE, 793–820.
45. Martin J, (2014) Drugs on the Dark Net: How Cryptomarkets are Transforming the Global Trade in Illicit Drugs. New York: Palgrave Pivot.
46. McCormack M, Adams A, Anderson E, (2013) Taking to the streets: the benefits of spontaneous methodological innovation in participant recruitment. Qualitative Research 13(2): 228–241.
47. McKee HA, Porter JE, (2009) The Ethics of Internet Research: A Rhetorical, Case-based Process. New York: Peter Lang.
48. McKenna KYA, Bargh JA, (1998) Coming out in the age of the internet: identity demarginalisation through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(3): 681–694.
49. Melrose M, (2002) Labour pains: some considerations on the difficulties of researching juvenile prostitution. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 5(4): 333–351.
50. Miller PG, Sønderlund AL, (2010) Using the internet to research hidden populations of illicit drug users: a review. Addiction 105(9): 1557–1567.
51. Northcote J, Moore D, (2010) Understanding contexts: methods and analysis in ethnographic research on drugs. In: Miller PG, Strang J, Miller PM, (eds) Addiction Research Methods. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell, 287–298.
52. Paechter C, (2013) Researching sensitive issues online: implications of a hybrid insider/outsider position in a retrospective ethnographic study. Qualitative Research 13(1): 71–86.
53. Perrone D, (2010) Gender and sexuality in the field: a female ethnographer’s experience researching drug use in dance clubs. Substance Use and Misuse 45(5): 717–735.
54. Pew Research Center (2014) Digital Life in 2025. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
55. Pink S, Horst H, Postill J, Hjorth L, Lewis T, Tacchi J, (2015) Digital Ethnography: Principles and Practice. London: SAGE.
56. Poulton E, (2012) ‘If you had balls, you’d be one of us!’ Doing gendered research: methodological reflections on being a female academic researcher in the hyper-masculine subculture of ‘football hooliganism’. Sociological Research Online 17(4): 4.
57. Rankin K, (2014) Tails above the rest, part II. Linux Journal April: 44–49.
58. Raynes-Goldie K. (2010) Aliases, creeping, and wall cleaning: understanding privacy in the age of Facebook. First Monday 15(1).
59. Reid E, (1993) Electronic chat: social issues on internet relay chat. Media Information Australia 67(1): 62–70.
60. Singer P, Flöck F, Meinhart C, Zeitfogel E, Strohmaier M, (2014) Evolution of Reddit: from the front page of the internet to a self-referential community? Proceedings of the companion publication of the 23rd international conference on World wide web companion. Seoul, South Korea: International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, 517–522.
61. Soska K, Christin N, (2015) Measuring the longitudinal evolution of the online anonymous marketplace ecosystem. The 24th USENIX Security Symposium (USENIX Security’15). Washington, DC, 33–48.
62. Tanis M, (2008) What makes the internet a place to seek social support? In: Konijn EA, Utz S, Tanis M, (eds) Mediated Interpersonal Communication. New York: Routledge, 290–308.
63. Van Buskirk J, Roxburgh A, Farrell M, Burns L, (2014) The closure of the Silk Road: what has this meant for online drug trading? Addiction 109(4): 517–518.
64. Van Hout MC, Bingham T, (2013a) ‘Silk Road’, the virtual drug marketplace: A single case study of user experiences. International Journal of Drug Policy 24(5): 385–391.
65. Van Hout MC, Bingham T, (2013b) ‘Surfing the Silk Road’: a study of users’ experiences. International Journal of Drug Policy 24(6): 524–529.
66. Van Hout MC, Bingham T, (2014) Responsible vendors, intelligent consumers: Silk Road, the online revolution in drug trading. International Journal of Drug Policy 25(2): 183–189.
67. Yassour-Borochowitz D, (2012). ‘Only if she is sexy’: an autoethnography of female researcher-male participants relations. Equality, Diversity and Inclusion: An International Journal 31(5/6): 402–417.
68. Whiteman N, (2012) Undoing Ethics. Rethinking Practice in Online Research. New York: Springer.
69. Williams M, (2007) Policing and cybersociety: the maturation of regulation within an online community. Policing and Society 17(1): 59–82.