The efficacy of interviewing young drug users through online chat

Drug and Alcohol Review

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 566-572

  Barratt, Monica J ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Designer drug; Feasibility study; Internet; Qualitative research; Youth

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNET; INTERVIEW; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL NETWORK;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AUSTRALIA; DRUG USERS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERNET; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL NETWORKING;

EID: 84861900761     PISSN: 09595236     EISSN: 14653362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2011.00399.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Household use of information technology, Australia, 2008-09. Canberra: ABS, 2009. Available at: (accessed November 2011).
2. Center for the Digital Future. World Internet project report 2009. Los Angeles, CA: USC Annenberg, 2008. Available at: (accessed November 2011).
3. Miller PG, Sønderlund AL. Using the Internet to research hidden populations of illicit drug users: a review. Addiction 2010;105:1557-67.
4. Quan-Haase A. University students' local and distant social ties: using and integrating modes of communication on campus. Inf Commun Soc 2007;10:671-93.
5. Boneva BS, Quinn A, Kraut RE, Kiesler S, Shklovski I. Teenage communication in the instant messaging era. In: Kraut RE, Brynin M, Kiesler S, eds. Computers, phones, and the Internet: domesticating information technology. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 2006:201-18.
6. Boyer EW, Lapen PT, Macalino G, Hibberd PL. Dissemination of psychoactive substance information by innovative drug users. Cyberpsychol Behav 2007;10:1-6.
7. Murguía E, Tackett-Gibson M. The New Drugs Internet Survey: a portrait of respondents. In: Murguía E, Tackett-Gibson M, Lessem A, eds. Real drugs in a virtual world: drug discourse and community online. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, 2007:45-58.
8. Davis M, Bolding G, Hart G, Sherr L, Elford J. Reflecting on the experience of interviewing online: perspectives from the Internet and HIV study in London. AIDS Care 2004;16:944-52.
9. Chen P, Hinton SM. Realtime interviewing using the World Wide Web. Sociol Res Online 1999;4:Issue 3. Available at: (accessed November 2011).
10. Ayling R, Mewse AJ. Evaluating Internet interviews with gay men. Qual Health Res 2009;19:566-76.
11. de Koster W, Houtman D. 'Stormfront is like a second home to me'. On virtual community formation by right-wing extremists. Inf Commun Soc 2008;11:1155-76.
12. Dunkels E, Enochsson A. Interviews with young people using online chat. In: Quigley M, ed. Encyclopedia of information ethics and security. Hersley, PA: Idea Group Reference, 2007:403-10.
13. Al-Saggaf Y, Williamson K. Online communities in Saudi Arabia: evaluating the impact on culture through online semi-structured interviews. Forum Qual Soc Res 2004;5:Article 3. Available at: (accessed November 2011).
14. O'Connor H, Madge C. Cyber-mothers: online synchronous interviewing using conferencing software. Sociol Res Online 2001;5:Issue 4. Available at: (accessed November 2011).
15. van Eeden-Moorefield B, Proulx CM, Pasley K. A comparison of Internet and face-to-face (FTF) qualitative methods in studying the relationships of gay men. J GLBT Fam Stud 2008;4:181-204.
16. Beusch D. Textual interaction as sexual interaction: sexuality and/in the online interview. Sociol Res Online 2007;12: Issue 5. Available at: (accessed November 2011).
17. James N, Busher H. Online interviewing. London: Sage, 2009.
18. Olivero N, Lunt P. When the ethic is functional to the method: the case of e-mail qualitative interviews. In: Buchanan EA, ed. Readings in virtual research ethics. Issues and controversies. London: Information Science Publishing, 2004:101-13.
19. Fontana A, Frey JH. The interview. From neutral stance to political involvement. In: Denzin NK, Lincoln VS, eds. Handbook of qualitative research, 3rd edn. London: Sage, 2005:695-727.
20. Hine C. Virtual ethnography: modes, varieties, affordances. In: Fielding N, Lee RM, Blank G, eds. The Sage handbook of online research methods. London: Sage, 2008:257-70.
21. Markham AN. The Internet as research context. In: Seale C, Gobo G, Gubrium JF, Silverman D, eds. Qualitative research practice. London: Sage, 2007:328-44.
22. Barratt MJ, Lenton S. Beyond recruitment? Participatory online research with people who use drugs. Int J Internet Res Ethics 2010;3:69-86. Available at: (accessed November 2011).
23. Barratt MJ. Discussing illicit drugs in public Internet forums: visibility, stigma, and pseudonymity. In: Kjeldskov J, Paay J, eds. Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Communities and Technologies. Brisbane: in press.
24. Illingworth N. The Internet matters: exploring the use of the Internet as a research tool. Sociol Res Online 2001;6: Issue 2. Available at: (accessed November 2011).
25. Slavin S. Drugs, space, and sociality in a gay nightclub in Sydney. J Contemp Ethnogr 2004;33:265-95.
26. Measham F, Moore K. Reluctant reflexivity, implicit insider knowledge and the development of club studies. In: Sanders B, ed. Drugs, clubs and young people Sociological and public health perspectives. Aldershot: Ashgate, 2006:12-25.
27. Measham F, Moore K. Repertoires of distinction: exploring patterns of weekend polydrug use within local leisure scenes across the English night time economy. Criminol Crim Justice 2009;9:437-64.
28. Keval HC. Negotiating constructions of 'insider'/'outsider' status and exploring the significance of dis/connections. Enquire 2009;4:51-72. Available at: (accessed November 2011).
29. Zimmer M. The gaze of the perfect search engine: Google as an infrastructure of dataveillance. In: Spink A, Zimmer M, eds. Web search: multidisciplinary perspectives. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2008:77-99.
30. Clarke RA. Information technology and dataveillance. Commun ACM 1988;31:498-512.