Protecting the interests of participants in research into illicit drug use: Two case studies

Addiction

Volumn 92, Issue 9, 1997, Pages 1081-1086

  Loxley, Wendy ^a   Hawks, David ^a   Bevan, Jude ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ILLICIT DRUG;

ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; DRUG ABUSE; HUMAN; LAW; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; PATIENT RIGHT; POLICE; RESPONSIBILITY;

EID: 0030769736     PISSN: 09652140     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.1997.tb03665.x     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. NH&MRC (1992) The NH&MRC Statement on Human Experimentation and Supplementary Notes (Canberra, National Health and Medical Research Council).
2. LAW REFORM COMMISSION OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA (1993) Report On Professional Privilege For Confidential Communications, Project No. 90, pp. 129-130 (Perth, Law Reform Commission of Western Autralia).
3. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND COMMUNITY MEDICINE FORUM (1995) Ethical and Legal Issues in Maintaining Confidentiality When Conducting Research into Illegal Behaviours (Melbourne, University of Melbourne).
4. Commonwealth Epidemiological Studies (Confidentiality) Act, 1981 (Canberra, AGPS).