The effects of hemodynamic lag on functional connectivity and behavior after stroke

Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism

Volumn 36, Issue 12, 2016, Pages 2162-2176

  Siegel, Joshua S ^a   Snyder, Abraham Z ^a,b   Ramsey, Lenny ^a   Shulman, Gordon L ^a   Corbetta, Maurizio ^a,b  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Acute stroke; brain ischemia; cerebral blood flow; cerebral hemodynamics; cognitive impairment; functional MRI

Indexed keywords

ARTERIAL SPIN LABELING; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; BEHAVIOR ASSESSMENT; BOLD SIGNAL; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; CAROTID ARTERY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOPPLER ULTRASONOGRAPHY; FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; GRAY MATTER; HEMODYNAMIC LAG; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; LANGUAGE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEMORY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VASCULAR PATENCY; VISION; ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN CIRCULATION; CASE CONTROL STUDY; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NERVE TRACT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; VASCULARIZATION;

ADULT; ATTENTION; BRAIN; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MOTOR ACTIVITY; NEURAL PATHWAYS; STROKE;

EID: 85001889625     PISSN: 0271678X     EISSN: 15597016     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X15614846     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Corbetta M. Functional connectivity and neurological recovery. Dev Psychobiol 2012; 54: 239-253.
2. Grefkes C, and Fink GR. Connectivity-based approaches in stroke and recovery of function. Lancet Neurol 2014; 13: 206-216.
3. D?Esposito M, Deouell LY, and Gazzaley A. Alterations in the BOLD fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging. Nat Rev Neurosci 2003; 4: 863-872.
4. Pineiro R, Pendlebury S, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Altered hemodynamic responses in patients after subcortical stroke measured by functional MRI. Stroke 2002; 33: 103-109.
5. Salinet ASM, Haunton VJ, Panerai RB, et al A systematic review of cerebral hemodynamic responses to neural activation following stroke. J Neurol 2013; 260: 2715-2721.
6. Carusone LM, Srinivasan J, Gitelman DR, et al. Hemodynamic response changes in cerebrovascular disease: implications for functional MR imaging. Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23: 1222-1228.
7. Bonakdarpour B, Parrish TB, and Thompson CK. Hemodynamic response function in patients with stroke-induced aphasia: Implications for fMRI data analysis. NeuroImage 2007; 36: 322-331.
8. Amemiya S, Kunimatsu A, Saito N, et al. Impaired hemodynamic response in the ischemic brain assessed with BOLD fMRI. NeuroImage 2012; 61: 579-590.
9. Amemiya S, Kunimatsu A, Saito N, et al. Cerebral hemodynamic impairment: Assessment with resting-state functional MR imaging. Radiology2013; 130982.
10. Lv Y, Margulies DS, Cameron Craddock R, et al. Identifying the perfusion deficit in acute stroke with resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Neurol 2013; 73: 136-140.
11. Longstreth WT, Manolio TA, Arnold A, et al. Clinical correlates of white matter findings on cranial magnetic resonance imaging of 3301 elderly people the cardiovascular health study. Stroke 1996; 27: 1274-1282.
12. Corbetta M, Ramsey L, Callejas A, et al. Common behavioral clusters and subcortical anatomy in stroke. Neuron 2015; 85: 927-941.
13. Wolf TJ, Baum C, and Connor LT. Changing face of stroke: Implications for occupational therapy practice. Am J Occup Ther Off Publ Am Occup Ther Assoc 2009; 63: 621-625.
14. Baldassarre A, Ramsey L, Hacker CL, et al. Large-scale changes in network interactions as a physiological signature of spatial neglect. Brain 2014; awu297.
15. Rowland DJ, Garbow JR, Laforest R, et al. Registration of [18F]FDG microPET and small-Animal MRI. Nucl Med Biol 2005; 32: 567-572.
16. Arbeláez AM, Su Y, Thomas JB, et al. Comparison of regional cerebral blood flow responses to hypoglycemia using pulsed arterial spin labeling and positron emission tomography. PLoS ONE 2013; 8: e60085.
17. Grant EG, Benson CB, Moneta GL, et al. Carotid artery stenosis: Gray-scale and Doppler US diagnosis-Society of radiologists in ultrasound consensus conference. Radiology 2003; 229: 340-346.
18. Brott T, Adams HP, Olinger CP, et al. Measurements of acute cerebral infarction: A clinical examination scale. Stroke 1989; 20: 864-870.
19. Hacker CD, Laumann TO, Szrama NP, et al. Restingstate network estimation in individual subjects2013.
20. Fischl B. FreeSurfer. NeuroImage 2012; 62: 774-781.
21. Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, et al. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. NeuroImage 2012; 59: 2142-2154.
22. Mitra A, Snyder AZ, Hacker CD, et al. Lag structure in resting-state fMRI. J Neurophysiol2014.
23. Siegel JS, Snyder AZ, Metcalf NV, et al. The circuitry of abulia: Insights from functional connectivity MRI. NeuroImage Clin 2014; 6: 320-326.
24. Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definitions for use in a multicenter clinical trial. TOAST. Trial of Org 10172 in acute stroke treatment. Stroke 1993; 24: 35-41.
25. Carter AR, Astafiev SV, Lang CE, et al. Resting interhemispheric functional magnetic resonance imaging connectivity predicts performance after stroke. Ann Neurol 2010; 67: 365-375.
26. Bauer AQ, Kraft AW, Wright PW, et al. Optical imaging of disrupted functional connectivity following ischemic stroke in mice. NeuroImage 2014; 99: 388-401.
27. Christen T, Jahanian H, Ni WW, et al. Noncontrast mapping of arterial delay and functional connectivity using resting-state functional MRI: A study in Moyamoya patients: Maps of Arterial Delay Using BOLD Signal. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; n/a-n/a.
28. Attwell D, Buchan AM, Charpak S, et al. Glial and neuronal control of brain blood flow. Nature 2010; 468: 232-243.
29. Petzold GC, and Murthy VN. Role of astrocytes in neurovascular coupling. Neuron 2011; 71: 782-797.
30. Hall CN, Reynell C, Gesslein B, et al. Capillary pericytes regulate cerebral blood flow in health and disease. Nature 2014; 508: 55-60.
31. Hauck EF, Apostel S, Hoffmann JF, et al. Capillary flow and diameter changes during reperfusion after global cerebral ischemia studied by intravital video microscopy. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2004; 24: 383-391.
32. Yemisci M, Gursoy-Ozdemir Y, Vural A, et al. Pericyte contraction induced by oxidative-nitrative stress impairs capillary reflow despite successful opening of an occluded cerebral artery. Nat Med 2009; 15: 1031-1037.
33. Schummers J, Yu H, and Sur M. Tuned responses of astrocytes and their influence on hemodynamic signals in the visual cortex. Science 2008; 320: 1638-1643.
34. Hathout GM, Gopi RK, Bandettini P, et al. The lag of cerebral hemodynamics with rapidly alternating periodic stimulation: modeling for functional MRI. Magn Reson Imag 1999; 17: 9-20.
35. Shih AY, Friedman B, Drew PJ, et al. Active dilation of penetrating arterioles restores red blood cell flux to penumbral neocortex after focal stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2009; 29: 738-751.
36. MacIntosh BJ, Lindsay AC, Kylintireas I, et al. Multiple inflow pulsed arterial spin-labeling reveals delays in the arterial arrival time in minor stroke and transient ischemic attack. Am J Neuroradiol 2010; 31: 1892-1894.
37. Powers WJ, Fox PT, and Raichle ME. The effect of carotid artery disease on the cerebrovascular response to physiologic stimulation. Neurology 1988; 38: 1475-1475.
38. de Haan B, Rorden C, and Karnath H-O. Abnormal perilesional BOLD signal is not correlated with stroke patients? behavior. Front Hum Neurosci 2013; 7: 669.
39. Rossini PM, Altamura C, Ferretti A, et al. Does cerebrovascular disease affect the coupling between neuronal activity and local haemodynamics?. Brain 2004; 127: 99-110.
40. Rosner G, Graf R, Kataoka K, et al. Selective functional vulnerability of cortical neurons following transient MCA-occlusion in the cat. Stroke 1986; 17: 76-82.
41. Schroeter ML, Cutini S, Wahl MM, et al. Neurovascular coupling is impaired in cerebral microangiopathy-An event-related Stroop study. NeuroImage 2007; 34: 26-34.
42. Hillis AE, Newhart M, Heidler J, et al. Anatomy of spatial attention: Insights from perfusion imaging and hemispatial neglect in acute stroke. J Neurosci 2005; 25: 3161-3167.
43. Lee J-M, Vo KD, An H, et al. Magnetic resonance cerebral metabolic rate of oxygen utilization in hyperacute stroke patients. Ann Neurol 2003; 53: 227-232.
44. Olivot J-M, Mlynash M, Thijs VN, et al. Optimal Tmax threshold for predicting penumbral tissue in acute. Stroke 2009; 40: 469-475.
45. Derdeyn CP. Mechanisms of ischemic stroke secondary to large artery atherosclerotic disease. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2007; 17: 303-311.
46. He BJ, Snyder AZ, Vincent JL, et al. Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron 2007; 53: 905-918.
47. Carter AR, Patel KR, Astafiev SV, et al. Upstream dysfunction of somatomotor functional connectivity after corticospinal damage in stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012; 26: 7-19.
48. Carter AR, Shulman GL, and Corbetta M. Why use a connectivity-based approach to study stroke and recovery of function?. NeuroImage 2012; 62: 2271-2280.
49. van Meer MP, van der Marel K, Wang K, et al. Recovery of sensorimotor function after experimental stroke correlates with restoration of resting-state interhemispheric functional connectivity. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 3964-3972.
50. van Meer MP, van der Marel K, Otte WM, et al. Correspondence between altered functional and structural connectivity in the contralesional sensorimotor cortex after unilateral stroke in rats: A combined restingstate functional MRI and manganese-enhanced MRI study. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010; 30: 1707-1711.
51. Wang L, Yu C, Chen H, et al. Dynamic functional reorganization of the motor execution network after stroke. Brain 2010; 133: 1224-1238.
52. Grefkes C, and Fink GR. Reorganization of cerebral networks after stroke: New insights from neuroimaging with connectivity approaches. Brain 2011; 134: 1264-1276.
53. Park C, Chang WH, Ohn SH, et al. Longitudinal changes of resting-state functional connectivity during motor recovery after. Stroke 2011; 42: 1357-1362.
54. Jiang L, Xu H, and Yu C. Brain connectivity plasticity in the motor network after ischemic stroke. Neural Plast2013; DOI: 10.1155/2013/924192.
55. Ovadia-Caro S, Villringer K, Fiebach J, et al. Longitudinal effects of lesions on functional networks after stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2013; 33: 1279-1285.
56. Várkuti B, Guan C, Pan Y, et al. Resting state changes in functional connectivity correlate with movement recovery for BCI and robot-Assisted upper-extremity training after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2013; 27: 53-62.
57. Ding X, Li C-Y, Wang Q-S, et al. Patterns in defaultmode network connectivity for determining outcomes in cognitive function in acute stroke patients. Neuroscience 2014; 277: 637-646.
58. Zhang J, Meng L, Qin W, et al. Structural damage and functional reorganization in ipsilesional M1 in wellrecovered patients with subcortical. Stroke 2014; 45: 788-793.
59. Donahue MJ, Strother MK, and Hendrikse J. Novel MRI approaches for assessing cerebral hemodynamics in ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Stroke 2012; 43: 903-915.
60. Kimura H, Kado H, Koshimoto Y, et al. Multislice continuous arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI in patients with chronic occlusive cerebrovascular disease: A correlative study with CO2 PET validation. J Magn Reson Imag 2005; 22: 189-198.
61. Wang DJJ, Alger JR, Qiao JX, et al. Multi-delay multiparametric arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI in acute ischemic stroke - Comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast enhanced perfusion imaging. NeuroImage Clin 2013; 3: 1-7.