Carotid Artery Stenosis: Gray-Scale and Doppler US Diagnosis - Society of Radiologists in Ultrasound Consensus Conference

Radiology

Volumn 229, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 340-346

  Grant, Edward G ^a   Benson, Carol B ^b   Moneta, Gregory L ^c   Alexandrov, Andrei V ⁱ   Baker, J Dennis ⁱ   Bluth, Edward I ^d   Carroll, Barbara A ^e   Eliasziw, Michael ⁱ   Gocke, John ^f   Hertzberg, Barbara S ^e   Katanick, Sandra ^g   Needleman, Laurence ^h   Pellerito, John ⁱ   Polak, Joseph F ⁱ   Rholl, Kenneth S ⁱ   Wooster, Douglas L ⁱ   Zierler, Eugene ⁱ  

^a USC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d OCHSNER CLINIC FOUNDATION   (United States)

^e DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f Midwest Heart Specialists   (United States)

^g Intersocietal Accreditation Commission   (United States)

^h THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ NONE

Author keywords

Carotid arteries; Carotid arteries, flow dynamics; Carotid arteries, stenosis or obstruction; Special Reports

Indexed keywords

BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CONFERENCE PAPER; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; GRAY SCALE ECHOGRAPHY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INTERNAL CAROTID ARTERY OCCLUSION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL;

CAROTID ARTERY, INTERNAL; CAROTID STENOSIS; HUMANS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER;

EID: 0142241155     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2292030516     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991; 325: 445-453.
2. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. JAMA 1995; 273:1421-1428.
3. European Carotid Surgery Trialists' Collaborative Group. MRC European Carotid Surgery Trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70-99%) or with mild (0-29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991; 337: 1235-1243.
4. Barnett HJM, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis. N Engl J Med 1998; 339: 1415-1425.
5. Byrd S, Robless P, Baxter A, Emson M, Halliday A. Carotid duplex ultrasonography: importance of standardisation. Int Angiol 1998; 17:248-254.
6. Huston J III, James MJ, Brown RD Jr, et al. Redefined duplex ultrasonographic criteria for diagnosis of carotid artery stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc 2000; 75:1133-1140.
7. Grant EG, Duerinckx AJ, El Saden S, et al. Doppler sonographic parameters for detection of carotid stenosis: is there an optimum method for their selection? AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:1123-1129.
8. AbuRahma AF, Robinson PA, Strickler DL, Alberts S, Young L. Proposed new duplex classification for threshold stenoses used in various symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid endarterectomy trials. Ann Vasc Surg 1998; 12:349-358.
9. Carpenter JP, Lexa FJ, Davis JT. Determination of duplex Doppler ultrasound criteria appropriate to the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. Stroke 1996; 27:695-699.
10. Hood DB, Mattos MA, Mansour A, et al. Prospective evaluation of new duplex criteria to identify 70% internal carotid artery stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1996; 23:254-261.
11. Carpenter JP, Lexa FJ, Davis JT. Determination of sixty percent or greater carotid artery stenosis by duplex Doppler ultrasonography. J Vasc Surg 1995; 22:697-703.
12. Browman MW, Cooperberg PL, Harrison PB, Marsh JI, Mallek N. Duplex ultrasonography criteria for internal carotid stenosis of more than 70% diameter: angiographic correlation and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. Can Assoc Radiol J 1995; 46:291-295.
13. Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Papanicolaou G, et al. Screening for asymptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis: duplex criteria for discriminating 60% to 99% stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21:989-994.
14. Neale ML, Chambers JL, Kelly AT, et al. Reappraisal of duplex criteria to assess significant carotid stenosis with special reference to reports from the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial and the European Carotid Surgery Trial. J Vasc Surg 1994; 20:642-649.
15. Moneta GL, Edwards JM, Chitwood RW, et al. Correlation of North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) angiographic definition of 70% to 99% internal carotid artery stenosis with duplex scanning. J Vasc Surg 1993; 17:152-159.
16. Umemura A, Yamada K. B-mode flow imaging of the carotid artery. Stroke 2001; 32:2055-2057.
17. Perkins JM, Galland RB, Simmons MJ, Magee TR. Carotid duplex imaging: variation and validation. Br J Surg 2000; 87: 320-322.
18. Grant EG, Duerinckx AJ, El Saden SM, et al. Ability to use duplex US to quantify internal carotid arterial stenoses: fact or fiction? Radiology 2000; 214:247-252.
19. Beebe HG, Salles-Cunha SX, Scissons RP, et al. Carotid arterial ultrasound scan imaging: A direct approach to stenosis measurement. J Vasc Surg 1999; 29:838-844.
20. Soulez G, Therasse E, Robillard P, et al. The value of internal carotid systolic velocity ratio for assessing carotid artery stenosis with Doppler sonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172:207-212.
21. Ranke C, Creutzig A, Becker H, Trappe HJ. Standardization of carotid ultrasound: a hemodynamic method to normalize for interindividual and interequipment variability. Stroke 1999; 30:402-406.
22. Derdeyn CP, Powers WJ. Cost-effectiveness of screening for asymptomatic carotid artery disease. Stroke 1996; 27: 1944-1950.
23. Griewig B, Morgenstern C, Driesner F, Kallwellis G, Walker ML, Kessler C. Cerebrovascular disease assessed by color-flow and power Doppler ultrasonography: comparison with digital subtraction angiography in internal carotid artery stenosis. Stroke 1996; 27:95-100.
24. Srinivasan J, Mayberg MR, Weiss DG, Eskridge J. Duplex accuracy compared with angiography in the Veterans Affairs Cooperative Studies Trial for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis. Neurosurgery 1995; 36: 648-653.
25. Hunink MG, Polak JF, Barlan MM, O'Leary DH. Detection and quantification of carotid artery stenosis: efficacy of various Doppler velocity parameters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1993; 160:619-625.
26. Bluth EI, Stavros AT, Marich KW, Aufrichtig D, Baker JD. Carotid duplex sonography: a multicenter recommendation for standardized imaging and Doppler criteria. RadioGraphics 1988; 8:487-506.
27. Brown PB, Zwiebel WJ, Call GK. Degree of cervical carotid artery stenosis and hemispheric stroke: duplex US findings. Radiology 1989; 170:541-543.
28. Carroll BA. Duplex sonography in patients with hemispheric symptoms. J Ultrasound Med 1989; 8:535-540.
29. de Virgilio C, Toosie K, Arnell T, et al. Asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis screening in patients with lower extremity atherosclerosis: a prospective study. Ann Vasc Surg 1997; 11:374-377.
30. Alexandrov AV, Brodie DS, McLean A, Hamilton P, Murphy J, Burns PN. Correlation of peak systolic velocity and angiographic measurement of carotid stenosis revisited. Stroke 1997; 28:339-342.
31. Fillinger MF, Baker RJ Jr, Zwolak RM, et al. Carotid duplex criteria for a 60% or greater angiographic stenosis: variation according to equipment. J Vasc Surg 1996; 24:856-864.
32. Howard G, Baker WH, Chambless LE, Howard VJ, Jones AM, Toole JF. An approach for the use of Doppler ultrasound as a screening tool for hemodynamically significant stenosis (despite heterogeneity of Doppler performance): a multicenter experience-Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study Investigators. Stroke 1996; 27:1951-1957.
33. Kuntz KM, Polak JF, Whittemore AD, Skillman JJ, Kent KC. Duplex ultrasound criteria for the identification of carotid stenosis should be laboratory specific. Stroke 1997; 28:597-602.
34. Zweibel WJ, Austin CW, Sackett JF, Strother CM. Correlation of high-resolution, B-mode, and continuous-wave Doppler sonography with arteriography in the diagnosis of carotid stenosis. Radiology 1983; 149:523-532.
35. EI-Saden SM, Grant EG, Hathout GM, Zimmerman PT, Cohen SN, Baker JD. Imaging of the internal carotid artery: the dilemma of total versus near total occlusion. Radiology 2001; 221:301-308.
36. Pan XM, Saloner D, Reilly LM, et al. Assessment of carotid artery stenosis by ultrasonography, conventional angiography, and magnetic resonance angiography: correlation with ex vivo measurement of plaque stenosis. J Vasc Surg 1995; 21:82-88.
37. Johnston DC, Eastwood JD, Nguyen T, Goldstein LB. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of carotid arteries: utility in routine clinical practice. Stroke 2002; 33:2834-2838.
38. Ozaki CK, Irwin PB, Flynn TC, Huber TS, Seeger JM. Surgical decision making for carotid endarterectomy and contemporary magnetic resonance angiography. Am J Surg 1999; 178:182-184.
39. Marcus CD, Ladam-Marcus VJ, Bigot JL, Clement C, Baehrel B, Menanteau BP. Carotid arterial stenosis: evaluation at CT angiography with the volume-rendering technique. Radiology 1999; 211:775-780.
40. Fox AJ. How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 1993; 186:316-318.