Brazil in the age of electronic commerce

Information Society

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 33-43

  Tigre, Paulo Bastos ^a,b  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO DE JANEIRO   (Brazil)

^b Departamento de Economia   (Brazil)

Author keywords

B2B diffusion patterns; Barriers and opportunities; Brazil; e commerce diffusion; e government; Economic impacts; Information technologies; IT education; Sector distribution; Telecommunication infrastructure

Indexed keywords

EID: 0037231539     PISSN: 01972243     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01972240309476     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Averbug, A. Brazilian trade liberalization and integration in the 1990s. 〈http://www.bndes.gov.br/english/studies/trade.pdf〉
2. CFF, Veirano & Advogados Associados. 2000. Gazeta Mercantil Latino Americana, 25 September-1 October, p. 18.
3. CONACyT. 1995. Indicators of scientific and technological activities. Mexico City: CONACyT.
4. Credicard. 2001. Gazeta Mercantil Latino-Americana, 12-18 February, p. 26.
5. Dedrick, J., and Kraemer, K. 1998. Asia's computer challenge: Threat or opportunity for the United States and the world? New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Dedrick, J., Kraemer, K., Palacios. J., Tigre, P., and Botelho, A. 2001. Economic liberalization and the computer industry: Comparing outcomes in Brazil and Mexico. World Development 29(7): 1199-1214.
7. Ernst & Young. 2001. Trends in on-line shopping. January, 〈www.ey.com/global/ger.nsf.international〉
8. Federação das Indústrias do Estado de São Paulo. 2000. Integraćão do Comércio Eletrônico nos Negócios da Empresa. 〈www.fiesp.com.br〉
9. Institute Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatísticas. 2001. Pesquisa Nacional de Amostra por Domicílio (PNAD). Brasilia: IBGE.
10. International Data Corporation. 2000. The 2000 IDC worldwide black book. Framingham, MA: IDC.
11. International Data Corporation. 2002. Internet commerce model, version 8.1. Framingham, MA: IDC.
12. International Telecommunication Union. 2000. Extracted from Gilson Schwanz, Nova Economia ainda divide especialistas. Folha de São Paulo, July 9, p. B11.
13. International Telecommunication Union. 2001. Yearbook of Statistics. Geneva: ITU.
14. Jones, J. 1993. Software productivity and quality today-The worldwide perspective.
15. Ministério da Ciência e Tecnologia. 2000. O Livra Verde da Sociedade da Informação no Brasil. Versão Preliminar. Brasília: MCT.
16. O Globo. 2001. FEBRABAN: Negócies eletrônicos já são 67.1% do total. April 9, p. 15.
17. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. 2000. Information technology outlook, Paris, 2000. ICTs, e-commerce and the information economy.
18. Pesquisa Nacional de Amostra por Domicílios. 1999.〈www.ibge.net/homme/estatistica/população/trabalhoerendim ento/pnad99.〉
19. Reed Electronics Research. 2000. The yearbook of world electronics data, 2000. Surrey, UK: Reed Electronics Research.
20. Sachs, J. D. 2000. Readiness for the networked world: A guide for developing countries. Cambridge, MA: Center for International Development, Harvard University.
21. Tigre, P. B. 2000. E-Commerce: O modelo competitivo na internet. São Paulo: Piano Editorial.
22. Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro. 2001. UFRJ on-line 〈www.ufrj.br〉, April.
23. United Nations Development Program. 1993. Human development report, 1993. New York: Oxford University Press.
24. United Nations Development Program. 1998. Human development report, 1998. New York: Oxford University Press.