Establishing the values for patient engagement (PE) in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) research: an international, multiple-stakeholder perspective

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2017, Pages 1393-1404

  Haywood, Kirstie ^a   Lyddiatt, Anne ^b   Brace McDonnell, Samantha J ^a,c   Staniszewska, Sophie ^a   Salek, Sam ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b Ingersoll   (Canada)

^c Independent Cancer Patient Voice (Reg Charity no 1138456)   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

HRQoL; Patient engagement; Patient involvement; Patient reported outcomes; Values

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; FRANCE; GERMANY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; NETHERLANDS; NORWAY; PATIENT ENGAGEMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; SWEDEN; UNITED KINGDOM; UNITED STATES; HEALTH STATUS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; METHODOLOGY;

HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONALITY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85001752295     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: 15732649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1465-5     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. NIHR. (2015). Going the Extra Mile: improving the nation’s health and wellbeing through public involvement in research. http://www.nihr.ac.uk/documents/about-NIHR/NIHR-Publications/Extra%20Mile2.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2016.
2. de Wit, M., Abma, T., Koelewijn-Van Loon, M., Collins, S., & Kirwan, J. (2013). Facilitating and inhibiting factors for long-term involvement of patients at outcome conferences—Lessons learnt from a decade of collaboration in OMERACT: a qualitative study. BMJ Open., 3(8), e003311.
3. Staniszewska, S., Haywood, K. L., Brett, J., & Tutton, L. (2012). Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: evolution not revolution. Patient, 5(2), 79–87.
4. Haywood, K., Brett, J., Salek, S., Marlett, N., Penman, C., Shklarov, S., et al. (2015). Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: What is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium. Quality of Life Research, 24(5), 1069–1076.
5. Gradinger, F., Britten, N., Wyatt, K., Froggatt, K., Gibson, A., Jacoby, A., et al. (2015). Values associated with public involvement in health and social care research: a narrative review. Health Expectations, 18(5), 661–675.
6. Popay, J., & Collins, M. (Eds) (2014). PiiAF: The Public Involvement Impact Assessment Framework Guidance. http://piiaf.org.uk/documents/piiaf-guidance-jan14.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2016.
7. Health Technology Assessment International (HTAi) Patient and Citizen Involvement Group (PCIG): Values and Quality Standards for Patient Involvement in HTA (2014). http://www.htai.org/fileadmin/HTAi_Files/ISG/PatientInvolvement/v2_files/Info/PCISG-Info-ValuesandStandards-30-Jun14.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2016.
8. Frank, L., Forsythe, L., Ellis, L., Schrandt, S., Sheridan, S., Gerson, J., et al. (2015). Conceptual and practical foundations of patient engagement in research at the patient-centred outcomes research institute. Quality of Life Research, 24, 1033–1041.
9. Chalmers, I., & Glasziou, P. (2009). Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence. Lancet, 374(9683), 86–89.
10. Staniszewska, S., Brett, J., Mockford, C., & Barber, R. (2011). The GRIPP checklist: Strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care, 27(4), 391–399.
11. Snape, D., Kirkham, J., Britten, N., Froggatt, K., Gradinger, F., Lobban, F., et al. (2014). Exploring perceived barriers, drivers, impacts and the need for evaluation of public involvement in health and social care research: A modified Delphi study. BMJ Open, 4(6), e004943.
12. Brown, J. I. D. (2005). The World Cafe. Shaping our futures through conversations that matter (p. 765). Oakland: Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.
13. Chapter 8 Patient Partners and OMERACT. In: M. Boers, J. R. Kirwan, & P. Tugwell et al. The OMERACT Handbook. Published by OMERACT Updated May 2016. http://www.omeract.org/pdf/OMERACT_Handbook.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2016.
14. Wilkinson, J. E., Rycroft-Malone, J., Davies, H. T., & McCormack, B. (2012). A creative approach to the development of an agenda for knowledge utilization: outputs from the 11th international knowledge utilization colloquium (KU 11). Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing, 9(4), 195–199.
15. Howitt, D. C. D. (2008). Introduction to research methods in psychology (2nd ed.). New York: Pearson Education Ltd.
16. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
17. Spencer, L., Ritchie, J., O’Connor, W., Morrell, G., & Ormston, R. (2014). Chapter 11: Analysis in practice. In J. Ritchie, J. Lewis, C. McNaughton-Nicholls, & R. Ormston (Eds.), Qualitative research practice: A guide for social science students and researchers. London: Sage.
18. de Wit, M. P. T., Berlo, S. E., Aanerud, G. J., et al. (2011). European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 70, 722–726.
19. Caeyer, N., & de Wit, M. (2013). Patient Involvement in Research: A way to success. EULAR—The reference cards explained. http://www.eular.org/myUploadData/files/Reference_cards_explained_Booklet_pages_23-08-13_1.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2016.
20. Cheung, P. P., deWit, M., Bingham, C. O., 3rd, Kirwan, J. R., Leong, A., March, L. M., et al. (2016). Recommendations for the Involvement of Patient Research Partners (PRP) in OMERACT Working Groups. A Report from the OMERACT 2014 Working Group on PRP. Journal of Rheumatology, 43(1), 187–193.
21. Winder, E. (2013). In collaboration with the Value+ Steering Group. The Value+ Toolkit for patient organisations on meaningful patient involvement patients adding value to policy, projects and services. http://www.eu-patient.eu/globalassets/projects/valueplus/value-toolkit.pdf. Accessed 23 June 2016.
22. ReseArch with Patient and Pulich involvement: A RealisT evaluation—The RAPPORT study. Health Services and Delivery Research, Vol 3, Issue 38. September 2015. ISSN 2050-4349. http://www.journalslibrary.nihr.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0009/152298/FullReport-hsdr03380.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2016.
23. Wilson, P., Mathie, E., Keenan, J., McNeilly, E., Goodman, C., Howe, A., et al. (2015). ReseArch with Patient and Public invOlvement: A RealisT evaluation—The RAPPORT study. Southampton: NIHR Journals Library.