Midclerkship feedback in the surgical clerkship: the “Professionalism, Reporting, Interpreting, Managing, Educating, and Procedural Skills” application utilizing learner self-assessment

American Journal of Surgery

Volumn 213, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 212-216

  Hochberg, Mark ^a   Berman, Russell ^a   Ogilvie, Jennifer ^a   Yingling, Sandra ^a   Lee, Sabrina ^a   Pusic, Martin ^a   Pachter, H Leon ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Clerkship feedback; Medical education; Medical student evaluation; Surgical clerkship

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SELF CONCEPT; SELF EVALUATION; SURGICAL TRAINING; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; EDUCATION; GENERAL SURGERY; MOBILE APPLICATION; NEW YORK; PROFESSIONALISM;

CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; FEEDBACK; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; MOBILE APPLICATIONS; NEW YORK; PROFESSIONALISM; SELF-ASSESSMENT; STUDENTS, MEDICAL;

EID: 85001574841     PISSN: 00029610     EISSN: 18791883     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2016.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. 1 Liaison Committee on Medical Education. Functions and Structure of a Medical School: Standards for Accreditation of Medical Education Programs Leading to the M.D. Degree, March 2014 Standards and Elements Effective July 1, 2015. Section 9.7 Formative Assessment and Feedback. Available at: http://lcme.org/wp-content/uploads/filebase/standards/2015-16_Functions-and-Structure-2015-6-16.docx. Accessed September 1, 2016.
2. 2 Eva, K.W., Regehr, G., Self-assessment in the health professions: a reformulation and research agenda. Acad Med 80:10 Suppl (2005), S46–S54.
3. 3 Pangaro, L., A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-training evaluations. Acad Med 74 (1999), 1203–1207.
4. 4 Ogburn, T., Espey, E., The R-I-M-E method for evaluation of medical students on an obstetrics and gynecology clerkship. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189 (2003), 666–669.
5. 5 Espey, E., Nuthalapaty, F., Cox, S., et al. To the point: medical education review of the RIME method for the evaluation of medical student clinical performance. Am J Obstet Gynecol 197 (2007 Aug), 123–133.
6. 6 Hemmer, P.A., Papp, K.K., Mechaber, A.J., et al. Evaluation, grading, and use of the RIME vocabulary on internal medicine clerkships: results of a national survey and comparison to other clinical clerkships. Teach Learn Med 20 (2008), 118–126.
7. 7 Ander, D.S., Wallenstein, J., Abramson, J.L., et al. Reporter-Interpreter-Manager-Educator (RIME) descriptive ratings as an evaluation tool in an emergency medicine clerkship. J Emerg Med 43 (2012), 720–727.
8. 8 Hicks, P.J., Cox, S.M., Espey, E., et al. To the point: medical education reviews – Dealing with student difficulties in the clinical setting. Am J Obstet Gynecol 193 (2005), 1915–1922.
9. 9 Bennett, A.J., Goldenhar, L.M., Stanford, K., Utilization of a formative evaluation card in a psychiatry clerkship. Acad Psychiatry 30 (2006), 319–324.
10. 10 Delzell, J.E., Chumley, H.S., Clarkson, A.L., Mid-clerkship feedback is effective in changing students’ recorded patient encounters. Fam Med 43 (2011), 586–588.
11. 11 Zehra, T., Sadaf, S., Lessons learnt: pilot of mid rotation feedback. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak 23 (2013), 97–98.
12. 12 Kruger, J., Dunning, D., Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments. J Pers Soc Psychol 77 (1999), 1121–1134.