Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the proseal laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques in patients with simulated difficult laryngoscopy using a rigid neck collar

Anesthesia and Analgesia

Volumn 107, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1253-1256

  Eschertzhuber, Stephan ^a,b   Brimacombe, Joseph ^b   Hohlrieder, Matthias ^a   Stadlbauer, Karl Heinz ^a   Keller, Christian ^a,c  

^a INNSBRUCK MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b CAIRNS BASE HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c SCHULTHESS CLINIC   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; AIR CONDITIONING; ARTICLE; ASPIRIN INDUCED ASTHMA; BOUGIE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL RADIOGRAPHY; DRAIN; DRUG INDUCED DISEASE; ELASTIC GUM BOUGIE; ENDOTRACHEAL TUBE; ESCHMANN TRACHEAL TUBE; ESOPHAGUS; FEMALE; FIXATION DEVICE; HUMAN; LARYNGEAL MASK; LARYNGOSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIGID NECK COLLAR; SIMULATED DIFFICULT LARYNGOSCOPY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGEAL MASKS; LARYNGOSCOPY; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 53449095556     PISSN: 00032999     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f0def     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Brain AIJ, Verghese C, Strube PJ. The LMA 'ProSeal'-a laryngeal mask with an oesophageal vent. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:650-4
2. LMA ProSealTM Instruction manual. 1st ed. San Diego: LMA North America Inc., 2000
3. Brimacombe J, Keller C. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Anesthesiology 2000;93:104-9
4. Evans NR, Gardner SV, James MF, King JA, Roux P, Bennett P, Nattrass R, Llewellyn R, Visu D. The ProSeal laryngeal mask: results of a descriptive trial with experience of 300 cases. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:534-9
5. Keller C, Brimacombe J. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the Proseal versus the classic laryngeal mask airway. Br J Anaesth 2000;85:262-6
6. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Berry A. Gastric insufflation with the ProSeal laryngeal mask. Anesth Analg 2001;92:1614-5
7. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Vosoba Judd D. Gum elastic bougieguided insertion of the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway is superior to the digital and introducer tool techniques. Anesthesiology 2004;100:25-9
8. Howarth A, Brimacombe J, Keller C. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. A new technique. Anaesth Intens Care 2002;30:624-7
9. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Gum elastic bougie-guided insertion of the ProSealTM laryngeal mask airway. Anaesth Intens Care 2004;32:681-4
10. Brain AIJ. Pressure in laryngeal mask airway cuffs. Anaesthesia 1996;51:603
11. Brimacombe J. Difficult airway. Laryngeal mask anesthesia. Principles and practice. London: WB Saunders, 2004;305-57
12. MacQuarrie K, Hung OR, Law JA. Tracheal intubation using Bullard laryngoscope for patients with a simulated difficult airway. Can J Anaesth 1999;46:760-5
13. Komatsu R, Nagata O, Kamata K, Yamagata K, Sessler D, Ozaki M. Intubating laryngeal mask airway allows tracheal intubation when the cervical spine is immobilized by a rigid collar. Br J Anaesth 2004;93:655-9
14. Wakeling HG, Nightingale J. The intubating laryngeal mask airway does not facilitate tracheal intubation in the presence of a neck collar in simulated trauma. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:254-6
15. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Keller K, Morris R. A comparison of four methods for assessing airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in adult patients. Br J Anaesth 1999; 82:286-7
16. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Kurian S, Myles J. Reliability of epigastric auscultation to detect gastric insufflation. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:127-9
17. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Brimacombe L. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway ProSealTM and the laryngeal tube airway in paralyzed anesthetized adult patients undergoing pressurecontrolled ventilation. Anesth Analg 2002;95:770-6
18. Brimacombe J, Keller C. Stability of the ProSeal and standard laryngeal mask airway in different head and neck positions. A randomised crossover study. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2003;20:65-9
19. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Fullekrug B, Agro F, Rosenblatt W, Dierdorf S, Garcia de Lucas E, Capdevila X, Brimacombe N. A multicenter study comparing the ProSeal with the Classic laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized, nonparalyzed patients. Anesthesiology 2002;96:289-95
20. Lu PP, Brimacombe J, Yang C, Lin C, Li J, Chung P, Shry M. The ProSeal versus the Classic laryngeal mask airway for positive pressure ventilation during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Anaesth 2002;88:824-5
21. Keller C, Brimacombe J, Kleinsasser A, Brimacombe L. The laryngeal mask airway ProSealTM as a temporary ventilatory device in grossly and morbidly obese patients before laryngoscope-guided tracheal intubation. Anesth Analg 2002;94:737-40
22. Brimacombe J, Keller C, Boehler M, Puehringer F. Positive pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study of healthy female patients. Anesth Analg 2001;93:1351-3
23. Everett LL, Hirschmann JV. Transient bacteremia and encocarditis prophylaxis. Med (Baltimore) 1977;56:61-77
24. Gaddis GM, Gaddis ML. Introduction to biostatistics: part 5, statistical inference techniques for hypothesis testing with nonparametric data. Ann Emerg Med 1990;19:1054-9
25. Branthwaite MA. An unexpected complication of the intubating laryngeal mask. Anaesthesia 1999;54:166-7
26. Asai T, Murao K, Shingu K. Efficacy of the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway during manual in-line stabilisation of the neck. Anaesthesia 2002;57:918-20