Advanced Nursing Process quality: Comparing the International Classification for Nursing Practice (ICNP) with the NANDA-International (NANDA-I) and Nursing Interventions Classification (NIC)

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 26, Issue 3-4, 2017, Pages 379-387

  Rabelo Silva, Eneida Rejane ^a   Dantas Cavalcanti, Ana Carla ^b   Ramos Goulart Caldas, Maria Cristina ^c   Lucena, Amália de Fátima ^a   Almeida, Miriam de Abreu ^a   Linch, Graciele Fernanda da Costa ^d   da Silva, Marcos Barragan ^a   Müller Staub, Maria ^e  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^b FLUMINENSE FEDERAL UNIVERSITY   (Brazil)

^c INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE CÂNCER   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE CIÊNCIAS DA SAÚDE DE PORTO ALEGRE   (Brazil)

^e HANZE UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

classification; International Classification for Nursing Practice; NANDA International; Nursing Interventions Classification; nursing process; nursing records; Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes instrument

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PRACTICE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; DIAGNOSIS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENT VALIDATION; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION FOR NURSING PRACTICE; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL RECORD; NOMENCLATURE; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; NURSING INTERVENTIONS CLASSIFICATION; NURSING OUTCOME; NURSING PROCESS; RELIABILITY; ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING; CLASSIFICATION; CONTROLLED VOCABULARY; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; NURSE; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING TERMINOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; STANDARDS;

ADVANCED PRACTICE NURSING; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; HUMANS; NURSES; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING RECORDS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; STANDARDIZED NURSING TERMINOLOGY; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 84999836196     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: 13652702     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.13387     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Ackley BJ & Ladwig GB (2014) Nursing Diagnosis Handbook: An Evidence-Based Guide to Planning Care, 10th edn. Mosby/Elsevier, St. Louis, MO.
2. Ackley BJ, Ladwig GB, Swan BA & Tucker SJ (2008) Evidence-Based Nursing Care Guidelines: Medical-Surgical Interventions. Mosby Elsevier, St. Louis, MO.
3. Anderson CA, Keenan G & Jones J (2009) Using biometrics to support your selection of a nursing terminology set. Computers, Informatics, Nursing 27, 82–90.
4. Brokel JM, Avant K & Odenbreit M (2012) The value of nursing diagnoses in electronic health records. In Nanda International Nursing Diagnoses Herdman TH (Ed). Kassel,Definitions and classification 2012-2014. Oxford, pp. 99–113.
5. Bruylands M, Paans W, Hediger H & Muller-Staub M (2013) Effects on the quality of the nursing care process through an educational program and the use of electronic nursing documentation. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge 24, 163–170.
6. Coenen A, Kim TY, Bartz CC, Jansen K & Hardiker N (2012) ICNP catalogues for supporting nursing content in electronic health records. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 180, 1075–1078.
7. Comitê Internacional de Enfermeiros (CIE) (2011) CIPE versão 2: Classificação Internacional para a Prática de Enfermagem [International Classification of Nursing Practice]: versão 2. Algol, São Paulo, Brasil.
8. Hardiker NR & Rector AL (2001) Structural validation of nursing terminologies. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 8, 212–221.
9. Häyrinen K, Lammintakanen J & Saranto K (2010) Evaluation of electronic nursing documentation – nursing process model and standardized terminologies as keys to visible and transparent nursing. International Journal of Medical Informatics 79, 554–564.
10. Head BJ, Scherb CA, Reed D, Conley DM, Weinberg B, Kozel M, Gillette S, Clarke M & Moorhead S (2011) Nursing diagnoses, interventions, and patient outcomes for hospitalized older adults with pneumonia. Research in Gerontological Nursing 4, 95–105.
11. Herdman TH & Kamitsuru S (2014) NANDA International Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions and Classification 2015–2017. Wiley Blackwell, Oxford.
12. Horta WA (1979) Processo de Enfermagem [Nursing Process]. EPU, São Paulo.
13. Johnson M, Moorhead S, Bulechek G, Butcher H, Maas M & Swanson E (2012) NOC and NIC Linkages to NANDA-I and Clinical Conditions, 3rd edn. Elsevier Mosby, Maryland Heights, MO.
14. Jones D, Lunney M, Keenan G & Moorhead S (2010) Standardized nursing languages: essential for the nursing workforce. Annual Review of Nursing Research 28, 253–294.
15. Keenan G, Tschannen D & Wesley ML (2008) Standardized nursing teminologies can transform practice. The Journal of Nursing Administration 38, 103–106.
16. Keenan GM, Yakel E, Yao Y, Xu D, Szalacha L, Tschannen D, Ford Y, Chen YC, Johnson A, Lopez KD & Wilkie DJ (2012) Maintaining a consistent big picture: meaningful use of a Web-based POC EHR system. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge 23, 119–133.
17. Keenan G, Yakel E, Dunn Lopez K, Tschannen D & Ford YB (2013) Challenges to nurses efforts of retrieving, documenting, and communicating patient care information. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 20, 245–251.
18. Kelley TF, Brandon DH & Docherty SL (2011) Electronic nursing documentation as a strategy to improve quality of patient care. Journal of Nursing Scholarship 43, 154–162.
19. Koczmara C, Jelincic V & Dueck C (2005) Dangerous abbreviations: “U” can make a difference!. Dynamics 16, 11–15.
20. Koczmara C, Dueck C & Jelincic V (2006) To err is human, to share is divine. Dynamics 17, 22–25.
21. Linch GFC, Müller-Staub M & Rabelo ERS (2010) Quality of nursing records and standardized language: analysis and comments. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing 9, 1–10.
22. Linch GF, Rabelo-Silva ER, Keenan GM, Moraes MA, Stifter J & Muller-Staub M (2015) Validation of the Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions, and Outcomes (Q-DIO) Instrument for use in Brazil and the United States. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge 26, 19–25.
23. Morais SCRV (2014) Nursing phenomena identified by nurses in a clinical case: considerations guided in NANDA-I, NOC, NIC and CIPE classifications. Dissertation, Doctoral Program in Nursing. Escola de Enfermagem de Ribeirão Preto/USP, São Paulo, Brasil.
24. Müller-Staub M, Lunney M, Lavin MA, Needham I, Odenbreit M & Van Achterberg T (2008a) Testing the Q-DIO as an instrument to measure the documented quality of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications 19, 20–27.
25. Müller-Staub M, Needham I, Odenbreit M, Lavin M & Van Achterberg T (2008b) Implementing nursing diagnostics effectively: cluster randomized trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing 63, 291–301.
26. Müller-Staub M, Lunney M, Odenbreit M, Needham I, Lavin M & Van Achterberg T (2009) Development of an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes: the Q-DIO. Journal of Clinical Nursing 18, 1027–1037.
27. Müller-Staub M, Abt J, Brenner A & Hofer B (2015) Expert Report on Nurses Responsibility. Swiss Nursing Science Association (ANS), Bern.
28. NANDA International (2015) Diagnósticos de Enfermagem da definições e classificação 2015–2017 [NANDA [Nursing Diagnoses of NANDA: Definitions and Classifications]. Artmed, Porto Alegre.
29. Paans W, Sermeus W, Nieweg R & Van der Schans C (2010) Determinants of the accuracy of nursing diagnoses: influence of ready knowledge, knowledge sources, disposition toward critical thinking, and reasoning skills. Journal of Professional Nursing 26, 232–241.
30. Paans W, Sermeus W, Nieweg RM, Krijnen WP & Van der Schans CP (2012) Do knowledge, knowledge sources and reasoning skills affect the accuracy of nursing diagnoses? A randomised study. BioMed Central Nursing 11, 11.
31. Saranto K & Kinnunen U (2009) Evaluating nursing documentation – research designs and methods: systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 65, 464–469.
32. Souza DRP, Andrade LT, Napoleão AA, Garcia TR & Chianca TCM (2015) Terms of International Classification for Nursing Practice in motor and physical rehabilitation. USP Nursing School Journal 49, 209–215.
33. Tastan S, Linch GC, Keenan GM, Stifter J, McKinney D, Fahey L, Lopez KD, Yao Y & Wilkie DJ (2014) Evidence for the existing American Nurses Association-recognized standardized nursing terminologies: a systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies 51, 1160–1170.
34. Wang N, Hailey D & Yu P (2011) Quality of nursing documentation and approaches to its evaluation: a mixed-method systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 67, 1858–1875.
35. Zegers M, de Bruijne MC, Spreeuwenberg P, Wagner C, Groenewegen PP & Van der Wal G (2011) Quality of patient record keeping: an indicator of the quality of care? British Medical Journal Quality & Safety 20, 314–318.