Evaluation of electronic nursing documentation-Nursing process model and standardized terminologies as keys to visible and transparent nursing

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 79, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 554-564

  Häyrinen, Kristiina ^a   Lammintakanen, Johanna ^a   Saranto, Kaija ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EASTERN FINLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

Classification; Computerized; Evaluation; Medical records; Nursing documentation; Terminology

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL HOSPITALS; COMPUTERIZED EVALUATION; CONTENT ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS; MEDICAL RECORD; NEEDS ASSESSMENT; NEUROLOGICAL PATIENT; NURSING CARE; NURSING DOCUMENTATION; NURSING INTERVENTIONS; NURSING PROCESS; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SAFETY; SURGICAL PATIENTS;

DIAGNOSIS; RECORDS MANAGEMENT; TERMINOLOGY;

NURSING;

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE NEED; MEDICAL DOCUMENTATION; NOMENCLATURE; NURSING CARE; NURSING CARE PLAN; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; NURSING INFORMATION SYSTEM; NURSING INTERVENTION; NURSING PROCESS; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS MODEL; SURGICAL PATIENT; FINLAND; MEDICAL RECORD; NONBIOLOGICAL MODEL;

FINLAND; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MODELS, ORGANIZATIONAL; NURSING PROCESS; NURSING RECORDS; TERMINOLOGY AS TOPIC;

EID: 77954349425     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.05.002     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. ISO/TR 20514, Health Informatics - Electronic Health Record - Definition, Scope, and Context 2005. Available from: 22.01.2010. http://www.openehr.org/downloads/standards/iso/isotc215wg3_N202_ISO-TR_2 0514_Final_%5B2005-01-31%5D.pdf.
2. Urquhart C., Currell R., Grant M.J., Hardiker N.R. Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and healthcare outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2009, (1). Art. No.: CD002099.pub2. 10.1002/14651858.
3. Ammenwerth E., Eichstadter R., Haux R., Pohl U., Rebel S., Ziegler S. A randomized evaluation of a computer-based nursing documentation system. Methods Inf. Med. 2001, 40(May (2)):61-68.
4. Mahler C., Ammenwerth E., Wagner A., Tautz A., Happek T., Hoppe B., Eichstadter R. Effects of a computer-based nursing documentation system on the quality of nursing documentation. J. Med. Syst. 2007, 31(August (4)):274-282.
5. Häyrinen K., Saranto K., Nykänen P. Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2008, 77(May (5)):291-304.
6. Saranto K., Kinnunen U.M. Evaluating nursing documentation-research designs and methods: systematic review. J. Adv. Nurs. 2009, 65(March (3)):464-476.
7. Yura H., Walsh M. The Nursing Process: Assessing, Planning, Implementing, Evaluating 1978, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York. third ed.
8. Pryor T.A. Computerized nurse charting. Int. J. Clin. Monit. Comput. 1989, 6(July (3)):173-179.
9. Holzemer W.L., Henry S.B. Computer-supported versus manually-generated nursing care plans: a comparison of patient problems, nursing interventions, and AIDS patient outcomes. Comput. Nurs. 1992, 10(January-February (1)):19-24.
10. Larrabee J.H., Boldreghini S., Elder-Sorrells K., Turner Z.M., Wender R.G., Hart J.M., Lenzi P.S. Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital. Comput. Nurs. 2001, 19(March-April (2)):56-65. quiz 66-8.
11. Daly J.M., Buckwalter K., Maas M. Written and computerized care plans, organizational processes and effect on patient outcomes. J. Gerontol. Nurs. 2002, 28(September (9)):14-23.
12. Björvell C., Wredling R., Thorell-Ekstrand I. Long-term increase in quality of nursing documentation: effects of a comprehensive intervention. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2002, 16(March (1)):34-42.
13. Ehrenberg A., Birgersson C. Nursing documentation of leg ulcers: adherence to clinical guidelines in a Swedish primary health care district. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2003, 17(September (3)):278-284.
14. Ehnfors M., Florin J., Ehrenberg A. Applicability of the international classification of nursing practice (ICNP) in the areas of nutrition and skin care. Int. J. Nurs. Terminol. Classif. 2003, 14(January-March (1)):5-18.
15. Törnvall E., Wilhelmsson S., Wahren L.K. Electronic nursing documentation in primary health care. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 2004, 18(September (3)):310-317.
16. Törnvall E., Wahren L.K., Wilhelmsson S. Impact of primary care management on nursing documentation. J. Nurs. Manag. 2007, 15(September (6)):634-642.
17. Averill C.B., Marek K.D., Zielstorff R., Kneedler J., Delaney C., Milholland D.K. ANA standards for nursing data sets in information systems. Comput. Nurs. 1998, 16(May-June (3)):157-161.
18. Henry S.B., Mead C.N. Nursing classification systems: necessary but not sufficient for representing " What Nurses Do" for inclusion in computer-based patient record systems. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1997, 4(May-June (3)):222-232.
19. Henry S.B., Warren J.J., Lange L., Button P. A review of major nursing vocabularies and the extent to which they have the characteristics required for implementation in computer-based systems. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1998, 5(July-August (4)):321-328.
20. Hardiker N.R., Hoy D., Casey A. Standards for nursing terminology. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 2000, 7(November-December (6)):523-528.
21. Dochterman J., Titler M., Wang J., Reed D., Pettit D., Mathew-Wilson M., Budreau G., Bulechek G., Kraus V., Kanak M. Describing use of nursing interventions for three groups of patients. J. Nurs. Scholarsh. 2005, 37(1):57-66.
22. Delaney C., Reed D., Clarke M. Describing patient problems & nursing treatment patterns using nursing minimum data sets (NMDS & NMMDS) & UHDDS repositories. Proc. AMIA Symp. 2000, 176-179.
23. Park M., Delaney C., Maas M., Reed D. Using a nursing minimum data set with older patients with dementia in an acute care setting. J. Adv. Nurs. 2004, 47(August (3)):329-339.
24. Smith K., Smith V., Krugman M., Oman K. Evaluating the impact of computerized clinical documentation. Comput. Inform. Nurs. 2005, 23(May-June (3)):132-138.
25. Goossen W.T., Epping P.J., Dassen T. Criteria for nursing information systems as a component of the electronic patient record. An international Delphi study. Comput. Nurs. 1997, 15(November-December (6)):307-315.
26. Brender J., Nohr C., McNair P. Research needs and priorities in health informatics. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2000, 58-59(September):257-289.
27. Grimson J. Delivering the electronic healthcare record for the 21st century. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2001, 64(December (2-3)):111-127.
28. van Ginneken A.M. The computerized patient record: balancing effort and benefit. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2002, 65(June (2)):97-119.
29. Evers G., Viane A., Sermeus W., Simoens-De Smet A., Delesie L. Frequency of and indications for wholly compensatory nursing care related to enteral food intake: a secondary analysis of the Belgium National Nursing Minimum Data Set. J. Adv. Nurs. 2000, 32(July (1)):194-201.
30. Prophet C.M. The evolution of a clinical database: from local to standardized clinical languages. Proc. AMIA Symp. 2000, 660-664.
31. Goossen W.T., Epping P.J., Feuth T., van den Heuvel W.J., Hasman A., Dassen T.W. Using the nursing minimum data set for the Netherlands (NMDSN) to illustrate differences in patient populations and variations in nursing activities. Int. J. Nurs. Stud. 2001, 38(June (3)):243-257.
32. Griens A.M., Goossen W.T., Van der Kloot W.A. Exploring the nursing minimum data set for the Netherlands using multidimensional scaling techniques. J. Adv. Nurs. 2001, 36(October (1)):89-101.
33. Goossen W.T. Statistical analysis of the nursing minimum data set for the Netherlands. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2002, 68(December (1-3)):205-218.
34. Tanttu K., Ikonen H. Nationally standardized electronic nursing documentation in Finland by the year 2007. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2006, 122:540-541.
35. Saba V.K. Nursing classifications: home health care classification system (HHCC): an overview. Online J. Issues Nurs. 2002, 7(3):9.
36. McCormick K.A., Lang N., Zielstorff R., Milholland D.K., Saba V., Jacox A. Toward standard classification schemes for nursing language: recommendations of the American Nurses' Association Steering Committee on databases to support clinical nursing practice. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 1994, 1(November-December (6)):421-427.
37. Fagerström L., Rainio A.K., Rauhala A., Nojonen K. Validation of a new method for patient classification, the Oulu patient classification. J. Adv. Nurs. 2000, 31:481-490.
38. K. Tanttu, From free text to standardized nursing language-the national development project of nursing documentation in Finland, IT @ NETWORKING COMMUNICATIONS, Volume 3/Issue 1, ISSN 1784-0716/December 2009-April 2010. 11.4.2010. http://hitm.eu/downloads/IT@09_Review.pdf.
39. Ensio A., Saranto K., Ikonen H., Iivari A. The national evaluation of standardized terminology. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2006, 122:749-752.
40. Werley H.H., Devine E.C., Zorn C.R., Ryan P., Westra B.L. The nursing minimum data set: abstraction tool for standardized, comparable, essential data. Am. J. Public Health 1991, 81(April (4)):421-426.
41. Jokinen T., Ensio A., Saranto K. Using standardized terminology for nursing documentation. Stud. Health Technol Inform. 2006, 122:995.
42. K. Remes, Structured Documentation in Nursing Discharge Summaries [Master's thesis on the Internet], University of Kuopio, 2006. Available from: 22.01.2010. http://www.uku.fi/tht/opinnaytteet/kmremesgradu.pdf.
43. Saranto K., Ensio A., Jokinen T. Patient medication-how is it documented?. Stud. Health Technol Inform. 2006, 122:738-741.
44. U.M. Kinnunen, Structured Data in the Wound Care Documentation, Master's Thesis, University of Kuopio, 2007. Available from: 22.01.2010. http://www.uku.fi/tht/opinnaytteet/UMKinnunengradu.pdf.
45. Ammenwerth E., de Keizer N. An inventory of evaluation studies of information technology in health care. Trends in evaluation research 1982-2002. Methods Inf. Med. 2005, 44(1):44-56.
46. Müller-Staub M., Lavin M.A., Needham I., van Achterberg T. Nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes-application and impact on nursing practice: systematic review. J. Adv. Nurs. 2006, 56(December (5)):514-531.
47. Ehnfors M., Smedby B. Nursing care as documented in patient records. Scand. J. Caring Sci. 1993, 7(4):209-220.
48. Björvell C., Thorell-Ekstrand I., Wredling R. Development of an audit instrument for nursing care plans in the patient record. Qual. Health Care. 2000, 9(March (1)):6-13.
49. Nahm R., Poston I. Measurement of the effects of an integrated, point-of-care computer system on quality of nursing documentation and patient satisfaction. Comput. Nurs. 2000, 18(September-October (5)):220-229.
50. Hellesø R. Information handling in the nursing discharge note. J. Clin. Nurs. 2006, 15(January (1)):11-21.
51. Müller-Staub M., Lunney M., Lavin M.A., Needham I., Odenbreit M., van Achterberg T. Testing the Q-DIO as an instrument to measure the documented quality of nursing diagnoses. Interventions, and outcomes. Int. J. Nurs. Terminol. Classif. 2008, 19(January-March (1)):20-27.