Development of an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes: The Q-DIO

Journal of Clinical Nursing

Volumn 18, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 1027-1037

  Müller Staub, Maria ^a   Lunney, Margaret ^b   Odenbreit, Matthias ^c   Needham, Ian ^d   Lavin, Mary Ann ^e   Van Achterberg, Theo ^f  

^a Pflege PBS   (Switzerland)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

^c SoH Spital Solothurn   (Switzerland)

^d Centre of Psychiatry Rheinau   (Switzerland)

^e SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Instrument development; Nursing diagnoses; Nursing documentation; Nursing interventions; Nursing sensitive patient outcomes; Patient record; Q DIO

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DOCUMENTATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; LINGUISTICS; MEDICAL RECORD; METHODOLOGY; NURSE; NURSING; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; OBSERVER VARIATION; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PILOT STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARD; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION STUDY;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DOCUMENTATION; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; NURSES; NURSING AUDIT; NURSING DIAGNOSIS; NURSING EVALUATION RESEARCH; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; NURSING RECORDS; OBSERVER VARIATION; OUTCOME AND PROCESS ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PILOT PROJECTS; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; VOCABULARY, CONTROLLED;

EID: 61849122253     PISSN: 09621067     EISSN: 13652702     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02603.x     Document Type: Article

References (78)

1. Allemann K, Frei G, Odenbreit M Rudin B (2003a) Leitfaden zur Pflegebedarfserfassung (PBE) im Pflegedienst des Bürgerspitals Solothurn. Bürgerspital, Solothurn, p. 3.
2. Allemann K, Leuenberger K, Frei G Rudin B (2003b) Standard Pflegebedarfserfassung (PBE) im Bürgerspital Solothurn. Bürgerspital, Solothurn.
3. Bethel S Ridder J (1994) Evaluating nursing practice: satisfaction at what cost? Nursing Management 25, 41 48.
4. Björvell C, Thorell-Ekstrand I Wredling R (2000) Development of an audit instrument for nursing care plans in the patient record. Quality in Health Care 9, 6 13.
5. Björvell C, Wredling R Thorell-Ekstrand I (2002) Long-term increase in quality of nursing documentation: effects of a comprehensive intervention. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 16, 34 42.
6. Bortz J (1999) Statistik für Sozialwissenschaftler. Springer, Berlin.
7. Bostick JE, Riggs CJ Rantz MJ (2003) Quality measurement in nursing. Journal of Nursing Care Quality 18, 94 104.
8. Brown KG, Dunn K, Ervin D Sedlak C (1987) Nursing diagnoses and process evaluation: implications for continuing education. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 18, 172 177.
9. Brune A Budde A (2000) Ergebnisse aus zwei empirischen Studien zum Stand der Einführung aus Sicht der Patienten und der Pflegenden. In Pflegediagnostik unter der Lupe: Wissenschaftliche Evaluation verschiedener Aspekte des Projektes Pflegediagnostik am UniversitätsSpital Zürich (Käppeli S ed). Zentrum für Entwicklung und Forschung Pflege, Zürich, pp. 62 102.
10. Budde A (1998) Stand der Einführung der Pflegediagnostik am Universitätsspital Zürich aus Patientensicht. Studiengang Pflegewissenschaft. Fachhochschule Osnabrück, Osnabrück.
11. Currell R Urquhart C (2003) Nursing record systems: effects on nursing practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 3 CD002099.
12. Delaney C, Mehmert PA, Prophet C, Bellinger SLR, Gardner-Huber D Ellerbe S (1992) Standardized nursing language for healthcare information systems. Journal of Medical Systems 16, 145 159.
13. Delaney C, Herr K, Maas M Specht J (2000) Reliability of nursing diagnoses documented in a computerized nursing information system. Nursing Diagnosis 11, 121 134.
14. Dobrzyn J (1995) Components of written nursing diagnostic statements. Nursing Diagnosis 6, 29 36.
15. Dochterman J Bulechek GM (2004) Nursing Interventions Classification NIC. Mosby, St Louis.
16. Ehrenberg A Ehnfors M (1999a) Patient problems, needs and nursing diagnoses in Swedish nursing home records. Nursing Diagnosis 10, 65 76.
17. Ehrenberg A Ehnfors M (1999b) Patient records in nursing homes: effects of training on content and comprehensiveness. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 13, 72 82.
18. Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M Thorell-Ekstrand I (1996) Nursing documentation in patient records: experience of the use of the VIPS model. Journal of Advanced Nursing 24, 853 867.
19. Ehrenberg A, Ehnfors M Smedby B (2001) Auditing nursing content in patient records. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 15, 133 141.
20. Erickson HC, Tomlin EM Swain MA (1991) Modeling and Role-Modeling: A Theory and Paradigm for Nursing, 4th edn. Pine-Press, Lexington.
21. Eriksen LR (1987) Patient satisfaction: an indicator of nursing care quality? Nursing Management 18, 31 35.
22. Gordon M (1994) Clinical judgment: an integrated model. Advances in Nursing Science 16, 55 70.
23. Gordon M Bartholomeyczik S (2001) Pflegediagnosen: Theoretische Grundlagen. Urban & Fischer, München.
24. Hanson MH, Kennedy FT, Dougherty LL Bauman LJ (1990) Education in nursing diagnosis: evaluating clinical outcomes. The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 21, 79 85.
25. Institute of Medicine (2001) Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century. National Academies Press, Washington.
26. Iyer PW, Taptich BJ Bernocci-Losey D (1995) Nursing Process and Nursing Diagnosis, 1st edn. W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia.
27. Johnson CF Hales LW (1989) Nursing diagnosis anyone? Do staff nurses use nursing diagnosis effectively? The Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing 20, 30 35.
28. Käppeli S (1995) Pflegediagnosen in der Akutpflege. Pflege: Die wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für Pflegeberufe 8, 113 120.
29. Kol Y, Jacobson O Wieler S (2003) Nursing interventions classification (NIC) and nursing outcomes classification (NOC) - from theory to practice. In ACENDIO, 2003 (Oud N ed Huber, Bern, pp. 296 301.
30. Krueger RA Casey MA (2000) Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research, 3rd edn. Sage, London.
31. Larrabee JH, Boldreghini S, Elder-Sorrelis K, Turner ZM, Wender RG, Hart JM Lenzi PS (2001) Evaluation of documentation before and after implementation of a nursing information system in an acute care hospital. Computers in Nursing 19, 56 65.
32. Lavin MA (2004) Stages of diffusion of an innovation: nursing diagnosis classification. In Paper Presented at the NANDA, NIC & NOC Conference (NANDA ed NANDA, Chicago, pp. 8 9.
33. Lunney M (1990) Accuracy of nursing diagnoses: concept development. Nursing Diagnosis 1, 12 17.
34. Lunney M (1992) Divergent productive thinking factors and accuracy of nursing diagnoses. Research in Nursing and Health 15, 303 311.
35. Lunney M (2001) Critical Thinking and Nursing Diagnoses: Case Studies and Analyses. NANDA International, Philadelphia.
36. Lunney M, Karlik B, Kiss M Murphy P (1997) Accuracy of nurses' diagnoses of psychosocial responses. Nursing Diagnosis 8, 157 166.
37. Lunney M, Delaney C, Duffy M, Moorhead S Welton J (2005) Advocating for standardized nursing languages in electronic health records. Journal of Nursing Administration 35, 1 3.
38. Maas M, Johnson M Kraus V (1996a) Nursing-sensitive patient outcomes classification. In Series on Nursing Administration: Outcomes of Effective Managesment Practices (Kelly K ed). Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, pp. 20 35.
39. Maas M, Johnson M Moorhead S (1996b) Classifying nursing-sensitive patient outcomes. Image: The Journal of Nursing Scholarship 28, 295 301.
40. Marek KD (1997) Measuring the effectiveness of nursing care. Outcomes Management for Nursing Practice 1, 8 12.
41. McFarland GK McFarlane EA (1997) Nursing Diagnosis and Interventions, 3rd edn. Mosby, St Louis.
42. Mize CP, Bentley G Hubbard S (1991) Standards of care: integrating nursing care plans and quality assurance activities. AACN Clinical Issues 2, 63 68.
43. Moers M Schiemann D (2000) Bericht der externen Evaluation zur Projekteinführung, -durchführung und -steuerung. In Pflegediagnostik unter der Lupe: Wissenschaftliche Evaluation verschiedener Aspekte des Projektes Pflegediagnostik am UniversitätsSpital Zürich (Käppeli S ed). Zentrum für Entwicklung und Forschung Pflege, Zürich, pp. 34 61.
44. Moloney R Maggs C (1999) A systematic review of the relationships between written manual nursing care planning, record keeping and patient outcomes. Journal of Advanced Nursing 30, 51 57.
45. Moorhead S, Johnson M Maas ML (2003) Measuring the outcomes of nursing care using the nursing outcomes classification: results and revisions based on 4 years of study. In ACENDIO 2003 (Oud N ed Huber, Bern, pp. 294 295.
46. Moorhead S, Johnson M Maas ML (2004) Nursing Outcomes Classification, 3rd edn. Mosby, St Louis.
47. Müller-Staub M (2000a) Pflegediagnostik und Patientinnen- Zufriedenheit. Literaturarbeit, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht/Aarau.
48. Müller-Staub M (2000b) Qualität der Pflegediagnostik und Patientinnen-Zufriedenheit. Master Thesis, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Maastricht, Maastricht/Aarau.
49. Müller-Staub M (2001) Qualität der Pflegediagnostik und Patientinnen-Zufriedenheit: Eine Literaturübersicht. Pflege: Die wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für Pflegeberufe 14, 230 238.
50. Müller-Staub M (2002) Qualität der Pflegediagnostik und PatientInnen-Zufriedenheit: Eine Studie zur Frage nach dem Zusammenhang. Pflege: Die wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift für Pflegeberufe 15, 113 121.
51. Müller-Staub M (2003) Entwicklung eines Instruments zur Messung pflegediagnostischer Qualität. PRINTERNET: Die wissenschaftliche Fachzeitschrift für die Pflege 5, 21 33.
52. Müller-Staub M, Smoliner A, Odenbreit M, Widmer R Knoth S (2004) Stellungnahme zum Artikel"Ergebnisse einer quantitativen Datenauswertung mittels ENP' in deutschen und österreichischen Einrichtungen'. PRINTERNET: Die wissenschaftliche Fachzeitschrift für die Pflege 6, 585 588.
53. Müller-Staub M, Lavin MA, Needham I van Achterberg T (2006) Nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes - application and impact on nursing practice: a systematic literature review. Journal of Advanced Nursing 56, 514 531.
54. Müller-Staub M, Needham I, Odenbreit M, Lavin MA van Achterberg T (2007a) Improved quality of nursing documentation: results of a nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes implementation study. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications 18, 5 17.
55. Müller-Staub M, Lavin MA, Needham I van Achterberg T (2007b) Meeting the criteria of a nursing diagnosis classification: evaluation of ICNP®, ICF, NANDA and ZEFP. International Journal of Nursing Studies 44, 702 713.
56. NANDA International (2003) Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions and Classification, 2003-2004. NANDA International, Philadelphia.
57. NANDA International (2005) Nursing Diagnoses: Definitions and Classification, 2005-2006. NANDA International, Philadelphia.
58. Needham I (2003) Kriterien zur Überprüfung von Pflegeplänen. Krankenpflege 96, 28.
59. Nordström G Gardulf A (1996) Nursing documentation in patient records. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences 10, 27 33.
60. O'Connor NA, Hameister AD Kershaw T (2000) Application of standardized nursing language to describe adult nurse practitioner practice. Nursing Diagnosis 11, 109 120.
61. Odenbreit M (2001a) Sinn und Zweck von Pflegeklassifikationen. Weiterbildungsszentrum für Gesundheitsberufe, Aarau.
62. Odenbreit M (2001b) Ziele, Definitionen, Merkmale und Prozess der Pflegediagnostik. Audiovisuelles Lehrmaterial. Bürgerspital, Solothurn.
63. Odenbreit M (2002a) Konzept zur Einführung der Pflegediagnosen. Bürgerspital, Solothurn.
64. Odenbreit M (2002b) Richtlinie Fallbesprechungen. Bürgerspital, Solothurn.
65. Oud N (2002) ACENDIO 2002. Sonderkonferenz in Wien. Huber, Bern.
66. Oud N (2003) ACENDIO 2003. Huber, Bern.
67. Oud N, Sermeus W Ehnfors M (2005) ACENDIO 2005. Huber, Bern.
68. Settelen-Strub C (1997) Der Diagnostische Prozess in der Pflege. Pflege 10, 35 42.
69. Sieleman J (1999) Utilization of nursing diagnoses in Iowa child health speciality clinics. Nursing Diagnosis 10, 113 120.
70. Streiner DL Norman GR (1995) Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to their Development and use. Oxford University Press, New York.
71. The University of Iowa College of Nursing (2004) Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC), Iowa City. Available at: http://www.nursing.uiowa.edu/ centers/cncce/noc/nocoverview (accessed 30 January 2006).
72. Titler M, Dochterman J, Picone DM, Everett L, Xie XJ, Kanak M Fei Q (2005) Cost of hospital care for elderly at risk of falling. Nursing Economics 23, 290 306, 279.
73. Turner SJ (1991) Nursing process, nursing diagnoses and care plans in a clinical setting. Journal of Nursing Staff Development 7, 239 243.
74. Van der Bruggen H (2002) Pflegeklassifikationen. Huber, Bern.
75. Van der Bruggen H Groen M (1999) Toward an unequivocal definition and classification of patient outcomes. Nursing Diagnosis 10, 93 102.
76. Waltz CF, Strickland OL Lenz ER (1991) Measurement in Nursing Research, 1st edn. F.A.Davis, Philadelphia.
77. Waltz CF, Strickland OL Lenz ER (2005) Measurement in Nursing and Health Care Research, 3rd edn. Springer, New York.
78. Wittwer M (2000) Veränderungsprozesse in Organisationen. In Pflegediagnostik unter der Lupe: Wissenschaftliche Evaluation verschiedener Aspekte des Projektes Pflegediagnostik am UniversitätsSpital Zürich (Käppeli S ed). Zentrum für Entwicklung und Forschung Pflege, Zürich, pp. 165 199.