Validation of the quality of diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes (Q-DIO) instrument for use in Brazil and the United States

International Journal of Nursing Knowledge

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 19-25

  Linch, Graciele Fernanda da Costa ^a   Rabelo Silva, Eneida Rejane ^b   Keenan, Gail Maria ^c   Moraes, Maria Antonieta ^d   Stifter, Janet ^c   Müller Staub, Maria ^e  

^a UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DE CIÊNCIAS DA SAÚDE DE PORTO ALEGRE   (Brazil)

^b FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^d INSTITUTO DE CARDIOLOGIA DO RIO GRANDE DO SUL   (Brazil)

^e ZURICH UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Electronic health record; Nursing diagnosis; Nursing record; Terminology as topic; Validation study

Indexed keywords

BRAZIL; DIAGNOSIS; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY;

BRAZIL; DIAGNOSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84920992550     PISSN: 20473087     EISSN: 20473095     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/2047-3095.12030     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Beaton, D., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine, 25(24), 3186-3191.
2. Fayers, P. M., & Machin, D. (2000). Quality of life: Assessment, analysis and interpretation. England: John Wiley & Sons.
3. Hair, J. F., Tatham, R. L., Rolph, A., & Black, W. (2009). Análise Multivariada de Dados (6th ed.). Porto Alegre, Brazil: Artmed.
4. Kelley, T. F., Brandon, D. H., & Docherty, S. L. (2011). Electronic nursing documentation as a strategy to improve quality of patient care. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 43(2), 154-162.
5. Linch, G. F. C., Müller-Staub, M., Moraes, M. A., Azzolin, K., & Rabelo, E. R. (2012). Cross-cultural adaptation of the Quality of Diagnoses, Interventions and Outcomes (Q-DIO) Instrument into Brazilian Portuguese. International Journal of Nursing Knowledge, 23(2), 1-8.
6. Linch, G. F. C., Müller-Staub, M., & Rabelo, E. R. (2010). Quality of nursing records and standardized language: Literature review. Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing, 9(2), 01-06.
7. Müller-Staub, M. (2009). Evaluation of the implementation of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 20(1), 9-15.
8. Müller-Staub, M., Lunney, M., Lavin, M., Needham, I., Odenbreit, M., & van Achterberg, T. (2008). Testing the Q-DIO as an instrument to measure the documented quality of nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 19(1), 20-27.
9. Müller-Staub, M., Lunney, M., Odenbreit, M., Needham, I., Lavin, M., & van Achterberg, T. (2009). Development of an instrument to measure the quality of documented nursing diagnoses, interventions and outcomes: The Q-DIO. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 18(7), 1027-1037.
10. Müller-Staub, M., Needham, I., Odenbreit, M., Lavin, M., & van Achterberg, T. (2007). Improved quality of nursing documentation: Results of a nursing diagnoses, interventions, and outcomes implementation study. International Journal of Nursing Terminologies and Classifications, 18(1), 5-17.
11. Müller-Staub, M., Needham, I., Odenbreit, M., Lavin, M., & van Achterberg, T. (2008). Implementing nursing diagnostics effectively: Cluster randomized trial. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63(3), 291-301.
12. Ochoa-Vigo, K., Pace, A., & Santos, C. (2003). Retrospective analysis of nursing records at a specialized unit. Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem, 11(2), 184-191.
13. Paans, W., Sermeus, W., Nieweg, R., & Van der Schans, C. (2010). Prevalence of accurate nursing documentation in patient records. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 66(11), 2481-2489.
14. Saranto, K., & Kinnunen, U. (2009). Evaluating nursing documentation-research designs and methods: Systematic review. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 65(3), 464-476.