Thirty Years of the International Journal of Intelligent Systems: A Bibliometric Review

International Journal of Intelligent Systems

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 526-554

  Merigó, José M ^a,b   Blanco Mesa, Fabio ^c   Gil Lafuente, Anna M ^d   Yager, Ronald R ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b KING SAUD UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

^c CENTRO DE INVESTIGACIONES   (Colombia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

^e MACHINE INTELLIGENCE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIBLIOGRAPHIES;

BIBLIOGRAPHIC COUPLINGS; BIBLIOMETRIC; COCITATION; H INDICES; HIGHLY-CITED PAPERS; INTERNATIONAL JOURNALS; WEB OF SCIENCE;

INTELLIGENT SYSTEMS;

EID: 84999008910     PISSN: 08848173     EISSN: 1098111X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/int.21859     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Merigó JM, Gil-Lafuente AM, Yager RR. An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators. Appl Soft Comp 2015;27:420–433.
2. Broadus RN. Toward a definition of “bibliometrics.” Scientometrics 1987;12:373–379.
3. Coupé T. Revealed performances: worldwide rankings of economists and economics departments, 1990–2000. J Eur Econ Assoc 2003;1:1309–1345.
4. Podsakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Podsakoff NP, Bachrach DG. Scholarly influence in the field of management: a bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. J Manage 2008;34:641–720.
5. Cobo MJ, Martínez MA, Gutiérrez-Salcedo M, Fujita H, Herrera-Viedma E. 25 years at knowledge-based systems: a bibliometric analysis. Knowl-Based Syst 2015;80:3–13.
6. Merigó JM, Mas-Tur A, Roig-Tierno N, Ribeiro-Soriano D. A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014. J Bus Res 2015;68:2645–2653.
7. Cakir MP, Acarturk C, Alasehir O, Cilingir C. A comparative analysis of global and national university ranking systems. Scientometrics 2015;103:813–848.
8. Bonilla C, Merigó JM, Torres-Abad C. Economics in Latin America: a bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics 2015;105:1239–1252.
9. Franceschini F, Maisano D. Sub-field normalization of the IEEE scientific journals based on their connection with technical societies. J Informetrics 2014;8:508–533.
10. Tsai CF. Citation impact analysis of top rated computer science journals and their rankings. J Informetrics 2014;8:318–328.
11. Godoy D, Zunino A, Mateos C. Publication practices in the Argentinean computer science community: a bibliometric perspective. Scientometrics 2015;2:1795–1814.
12. Singh VK, Uddin A, Pinto D. Computer science research: the top 100 institutions in India and in the world. Scientometrics 2015;104:529–553.
13. Uddin A, Singh VK, Pinto D, Olmos I. Scientometric mapping of computer science research in Mexico. Scientometrics 2015;105:97–114.
14. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Bibliometric mapping of the computational intelligence field. Int J Uncert Fuzz Knowl-Based Syst 2007;15:625–645.
15. Yu D. A scientometrics review on aggregation operator research. Scientometrics 2015;105:115–133.
16. Yu D, Shi SS. Researching the development of Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy set: using a citation network analysis. Appl Soft Comput 2015;32:189–198.
17. Yu D, Li DF, Merigó JM, Fang L. Mapping development of linguistic decision making studies. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 2016;30:2727–2736.
18. Yin MS. Fifteen years of grey system theory research: a historical review and bibliometric analysis. Expert Syst Appl 2013;40:2767–2775.
19. Deng GF, Lin WT. Citation analysis and bibliometric approach for ant colony optimization from 1996 to 2010. Expert Syst Appl 2012;39:6229–6237.
20. Van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010;84:523–538.
21. Martyn J. Bibliographic coupling. J Doc 1964;20:236.
22. Small H. Co-citation in the scientific literature: a new measure of the relationship between two documents. J Am Soc Inform Sci 1973;24:265–269.
23. Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F. H-index: a review focused on its variants, computation, and standardization for different scientific fields. J Informetrics 2009;3:273–289.
24. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005;102:16569–16572.
25. Martínez MA, Herrera M, López-Gijón J, Herrera-Viedma E. H-classics: characterizing the concept of citation classics through H-index. Scientometrics 2014;98:1971–1983.
26. Yager RR. Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. Int J Intell Syst 1996;11:49–73.
27. Xu ZS, Da QL. An overview of operators for aggregating information. Int J Intell Syst 2003;18:953–969.
28. Xu ZS. An overview of methods for determining OWA weights, Int J Intell Syst 2005;20:843–865.
29. Torra V. The weighted OWA operator. Int J Intell Syst 1997;12:153–166.
30. Torra V. Hesitant fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 2010;25:529–539.
31. Merigó JM, Cancino C, Coronado F, Urbano D. Academic research in innovation: a country analysis. Scientometrics 2016;108:559–593.
32. Zadeh LA. Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 1965;8:338–353.
33. Emrouznejad A, Marra M. Ordered weighted averaging operators 1988–2014. A citation based literature survey. Int J Intell Syst 2014;29:994–1014.
34. Yager RR. On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B 1988;18:183–190.
35. Shafer G. Mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 1976.
36. Klir GJ, Yuan B. Fuzzy sets and fuzzy logic: Theory and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1995.
37. Merigó JM, Rocafort A, Aznar-Alarcón JP. A bibliometric overview of business & economics research. J Bus Econ Manag 2016;17:397–413.
38. Yager RR, Kacprzyk J, Beliakov G. Recent developments on the ordered weighted averaging operators: Theory and practice. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2011.
39. Merigó JM, Núñez A. Influential journals in health research: a bibliometric study. Globalization Health 2016;12:46.