Academic research in innovation: a country analysis

Scientometrics

Volumn 108, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 559-593

  Merigó, José M ^a   Cancino, Christian A ^a   Coronado, Freddy ^a   Urbano, David ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Bibliometrics; Country analysis; Innovation; VOS viewer; Web of Science

Indexed keywords

EID: 84983087368     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-1984-4     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Alonso, S., Cabrerizo, F. J., Herrera-Viedma, E., & Herrera, F. (2009). H-index: A review focused on its variants, computation, and standardization for different scientific fields. Journal of Informetrics, 3, 273–289.
2. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. American Economic Review, 86, 630–640.
3. Bertocchi, G., Gambardella, A., Jappelli, T., Nappi, C. A., & Peracchi, F. (2015). Bibliometric evaluation vs informed peer review: Evidence from Italy. Research Policy, 44, 451–466.
4. Biemans, W., Griffin, A., & Moenaert, R. (2007). Twenty years of the Journal of Product Innovation Management: History, participants, and knowledge stock and flows. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 193–213.
5. Biemans, W., Griffin, A., & Moenaert, R. (2010). In search of the classics: A study of the impact of JPIM papers from 1984 to 2003. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 461–484.
6. Bonilla, C., Merigó, J. M., & Torres-Abad, C. (2015). Economics in Latin America: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 105, 1239–1252.
7. Broadus, R. N. (1987). Toward a definition of “Bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, 12, 373–379.
8. Cancino, C., Merigó, J. M., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2015). A bibliometric analysis of innovation research. CID Working Papers, 2015-01. Chile: University of Chile.
9. Cheng, C. H., Kumar, A., Motwani, J. G., Reisman, A., & Madan, M. S. (1999). A citation analysis of the technology innovation management journals. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 46, 4–13.
10. Collazo-Reyes, F. (2014). Growth of the number of indexed journals of Latin America and the Caribbean: The effect on the impact of each country. Scientometrics, 98, 197–209.
11. Confraria, H., & Godinho, M. M. (2015). The impact of African science: A bibliometric analysis. Scientometrics, 102, 1241–1268.
12. Coupé, T. (2003). Revealed performances: Worldwide rankings of economists and economics departments, 1990–2000. Journal of the European Economic Association, 1, 1309–1345.
13. Ding, Y., Rousseau, R., & Wolfram, D. (2014). Measuring scholarly impact: Methods and practice. Cham: Springer International Publishing.
14. Durisin, B., Calabretta, G., & Parmeggiani, V. (2010). The intellectual structure of product innovation research: A bibliometric study of the Journal of Product Innovation Management, 1984–2004. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27, 437–451.
15. Egghe, L. (2006). Theory and practice of the g-index. Scientometrics, 69, 131–152.
16. Emrouznejad, A., & Marra, M. (2014). Ordered weighted averaging operators 1988–2014. A citation based literature survey. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 29, 994–1014.
17. Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M., & Sapprasert, K. (2012). Innovation: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41, 1132–1153.
18. Fagerberg, J., & Verspagen, B. (2009). Innovation studies: The emerging structure of a new scientific field. Research Policy, 38, 218–233.
19. Finardi, U. (2015). Scientific collaboration between BRICS countries. Scientometrics, 102, 1139–1166.
20. Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 16569–16572.
21. Huang, C., Su, J., Xie, X., Ye, X., Li, Z., Porter, A., & Li, J. (2015). A bibliometric study of China’s science and technology policies: 1949–2010. Scientometrics, 102, 1521–1539.
22. Karamourzov, R. (2012). The development trends of science in the CIS countries on the basis of some scientometric indicators. Scientometrics, 91, 1–14.
23. Landström, H., Harirchi, G., & Aström, F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: Exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41, 1154–1181.
24. Linton, J. D. (2004). Perspective: Ranking business schools on the management of technology. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 416–430.
25. Linton, J. D., & Embrechts, M. (2007). MOT TIM journal rankings 2006. Technovation, 27, 91–94.
26. Linton, J. D., & Thongpapanl, N. (2004). Perspective: Ranking the technology innovation management journals. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 21, 123–139.
27. Martin, B. R. (2012). The evolution of science policy and innovation studies. Research Policy, 41, 1219–1239.
28. Martyn, J. (1964). Bibliographic coupling. Journal of Documentation, 20, 236.
29. Merigó, J. M., Gil-Lafuente, A. M., & Yager, R. R. (2015a). An overview of fuzzy research with bibliometric indicators. Applied Soft Computing, 27, 420–433.
30. Merigó, J. M., Mas-Tur, A., Roig-Tierno, N., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2015b). A bibliometric overview of the Journal of Business Research between 1973 and 2014. Journal of Business Research, 68, 2645–2653.
31. Merigó, J. M., & Yang, J. B. (2016). Accounting research: A bibliometric analysis. Australian Accounting Review. doi:10.1111/auar.12109.
32. Merino, M. T. G., do Carmo, M. L. P., & Alvarez, M. V. S. (2006). 25 years of Technovation: Characterization and evolution of the journal. Technovation, 26, 1303–1316.
33. Mongeon, P., & Paul-Hus, A. (2016). The journal coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: A comparative analysis. Scientometrics, 106, 213–228.
34. Panat, R. (2014). On the data and analysis of the research output of India and China: India has significantly fallen behind China. Scientometrics, 100, 471–481.
35. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, N. P., & Bachrach, D. G. (2008). Scholarly influence in the field of management: A bibliometric analysis of the determinants of university and author impact in the management literature in the past quarter century. Journal of Management, 34, 641–720.
36. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
37. Shafique, M. (2013). Thinking inside the box: Intellectual structure of the knowledge base of innovation research (1988–2008). Strategic Management Journal, 34, 62–93.
38. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509–533.
39. Thieme, J. (2007). Perspective: The world’s top innovation management scholars and their social capital. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24, 214–229.
40. Thongpapanl, N. T. (2012). The changing landscape of technology and innovation management: An updated ranking of journals in the field. Technovation, 32, 257–271.
41. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2007). Africa’s contribution to the worldwide research literature: New analytical perspectives, trends, and performance indicators. Scientometrics, 71, 303–327.
42. Toivanen, H. (2014). The shift from theory to innovation: The evolution of Brazilian research frontiers 2005–2011. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 26, 105–119.
43. Toivanen, H., & Ponomariov, B. (2011). African regional innovation systems: Bibliometric analysis of research collaboration patterns 2005–2009. Scientometrics, 88, 471–493.
44. Van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84, 523–538.
45. Waast, R., & Rossi, P. L. (2010). Scientific production in Arab countries: A bibliometric perspective. Science Technology & Society, 15, 339–370.
46. Yang, P., & Tao, L. (2012). Perspective: Ranking of the world’s top innovation management scholars and universities. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29, 319–331.
47. Yeo, W. D., Kim, S. H., Park, H. W., & Kang, J. W. (2015). A bibliometric method for measuring the degree of technological innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 95, 152–162.
48. Yu, D., & Shi, S. (2015). Researching the development of Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy set: Using a citation network analysis. Applied Soft Computing, 32, 189–198.
49. Zacca-González, G., Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z., Vargas-Quesada, B., & de Moya-Anegón, F. (2014). Bibliometric analysis of regional Latin America’s scientific output in public health through SCImago journal & country Rank. BMC Public Health, 14, 632.
50. Zavadskas, E. K., Kirvaitis, R., & Dagiene, E. (2011). Scientific publications released in the Baltic States. Scientometrics, 88, 179–190.
51. Zhu, J., Hassan, S. U., Mirza, H. T., & Xie, Q. (2014). Measuring recent research performance for Chinese universities using bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 101, 429–443.