Scientometric mapping of computer science research in Mexico

Scientometrics

Volumn 105, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 97-114

  Uddin, Ashraf ^a   Singh, Vivek Kumar ^a   Pinto, David ^b   Olmos, Ivan ^b  

^a SOUTH ASIAN UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b BENEMÉRITA UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE PUEBLA   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Mapping; Mexico; Research competitiveness; Scientometrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84942987368     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-015-1654-y     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C. A., & Murgia, G. (2013). The collaboration behaviors of scientists in Italy: A field level analysis. Journal of Informetrics,7(2), 442–454.
2. Baeza-Yates, R. A., Fuller, D. A., Pino, J. A., & Goodman, S. E. (1995). Computing in Chile: The jaguar of the Pacific Rim? Communications of the ACM,38(9), 23–28.
3. Bhattacharya, S., & Bhati, M. (2012). China and India: The two new players in the nanotechnology race. Scientometrics,93(1), 59–87.
4. Cisneros, G. (1991). La Computación en México y la influencia de HV McIntosh en su desarrollo. Computer Science in Mexico and the Influence of HV McIntosh on its Development], Reunión Nacional de Matemáticos en Homenaje al Dr. José Adem, ‘‘Medio Siglo de Matemáticas en México: Estado Actual y Perspectivas.
5. Costa, B. M. G., Pedro, E. S., & Macedo, G. R. (2013). Scientific collaboration in biotechnology: The case of the northeast region in Brazil. Scientometrics,95(2), 571–592.
6. Ding, Z. Q., Ge, J. P., Wu, X. M., & Zheng, X. N. (2013). Bibliometrics evaluation of research performance in pharmacology/pharmacy: China relative to ten representative countries. Scientometrics,96(3), 829–844.
7. Finerman, A. (1969). Computing capabilities at Argentine and Chilean universities. Communications of the ACM,12(8), 425–431.
8. Fu, H. Z., & Ho, Y. S. (2013). Independent research of China in science citation index expanded during 1980–2011. Journal of Informetrics,7(1), 210–222.
9. González, M., & Martínez, A. C. (2000). Historia de la computación en México: una industria en desarrollo. Mexico: Hobbiton Ediciones.
10. Gupta, B. M., Kshitij, A., & Verma, C. (2011). Mapping of Indian computer science research output, 1999–2008. Scientometrics,86(2), 261–283.
11. Guzman, A., & McIntosh, H. V. (1966). Convert. Communications of the ACM,9(8), 604–615.
12. Karpagam, R., Gopalakrishnan, S., Babu, B. R., & Natarajan, M. (2012). Scientometric analysis of stem cell research: a comparative study of India and other countries. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management,6(2), 229–252.
13. Kostoff, Ronald N. (2008). Comparison of China/USA science and technology performance. Journal of Informetrics,2(4), 354–363.
14. Kumar, S., & Garg, K. C. (2005). Scientometrics of computer science research in India and China. Scientometrics,64(2), 121–132.
15. Larsen, P. O., Maye, I., & von Ins, M. (2008). Scientific output and impact: Relative positions of China, Europe, India, Japan and the USA. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management,2(2), 1–10.
16. Lemaître, C. (1988). La computación en la UNAM en el período de 1968–1980: Una interpretación. Pasado, Presente y Futuro de la Computación,30, 358–369.
17. Lomnitz, L. A., & Cházaro, L. (1999). Basic, applied and technological research: Computer science and applied mathematics at the National Autonomous University of Mexico. Social Studies of Science,29(1), 113–134.
18. Ma, R., Ni, C., & Qiu, J. (2008). Scientific research competitiveness of world universities in computer science. Scientometrics,76(2), 245–260.
19. Onyancha, O. B., & Maluleka, J. R. (2011). Knowledge production through collaborative research in sub-Saharan Africa: How much do countries contribute to each other’s knowledge output and citation impact? Scientometrics,87(2), 315–336.
20. Ozel, B. (2012). Collaboration structure and knowledge diffusion in Turkish management academia. Scientometrics,93(1), 183–206.
21. Pavon, R. (1958). The Mexican light and power company introduces a direct way for fast computation of industrial services with power factor adjustment. In Preprints of papers presented at the 13th national meeting of the Association for Computing Machinery (pp. 1–3). New York, NY: ACM, USA.
22. Robles, J. C. G., & Rodríguez-Escobar, E. (2008). Entrevista personal con dos miembros del equipo de diseño de la IPN E-16. México: Ciudad de México. (30).
23. Segovia, R., Gursharan, S., & Loyo, C. (1979). Redes de computadoras. Ciencia y Desarrollo, 26, 10–19.
24. Singh, V. K., Uddin, A., & Pinto, D. (2015). Computer science research: The top 100 institutions in India and in the world. Scientometrics, Springer,. doi:10.1007/s11192-015-1612-8.
25. Singhal, K., Banshal, S. K., Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2014). The information technology knowledge infrastructure and research in South Asia. Journal of Scientometric Research,3(4), 134–142.
26. Soriano, M., & Lemaître, C. (1985). La era digital. Ciencia y Desarrollo,60, 133–140.
27. Tang, L., & Shapira, P. (2011). China–US scientific collaboration in nanotechnology: Patterns and dynamics. Scientometrics,88(1), 1–16.
28. Teodorescu, D., & Andrei, T. (2011). The growth of international collaboration in East European scholarly communities: a bibliometric analysis of journal articles published between 1989 and 2009. Scientometrics,89(2), 711–722.
29. Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2014a). Measuring research output and collaboration in South Asian countries. Current Science,107(1), 31–38.
30. Uddin, A., & Singh, V. K. (2014b). Mapping the computer science research in SAARC countries. IETE Technical Review,31(4), 287–296.
31. Villasenor, Y. F. (1982). Evolution of a program in computing for a Latin American graduate college. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin,14(2), 11–16.