Publication practices in the Argentinian Computer Science community: a bibliometric perspective

Scientometrics

Volumn 102, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 1795-1814

  Godoy, Daniela ^a   Zunino, Alejandro ^a   Mateos, Cristian ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL CENTRO DE LA PROVINCIA DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Computer science; Conferences and journals; Publication practices

Indexed keywords

EID: 84921894452     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1450-0     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Anderson, T. (2009). Conference reviewing considered harmful. ACM SIGOPS Operating Systems Review, 43(2), 108–116.
2. Birman, K., & Schneider, F. B. (2009). Viewpoint: Program committee overload in systems. Communications of the ACM, 52(5), 34–37.
3. Eckmann, M., Rocha, A., & Wainer, J. (2012). Relationship between high-quality journals and conferences in computer vision. Scientometrics, 90(2), 617–630.
4. Fortnow, L. (2009). Viewpoint: Time for computer science to grow up. Communications of the ACM, 52(8), 33–35.
5. Franceschet, M. (2010). The role of conference publications in CS. Communications of the ACM, 53(12), 129–132.
6. Franceschet, M. (2011). The skewness of computer science. Information Processing & Management, 47(1), 117–124.
7. Freyne, J., Coyle, L., Smyth, B., & Cunningham, P. (2010). Relative status of journal and conference publications in computer science. Communications of the ACM, 53(11), 124–132.
8. Halpern, J. Y., & Parkes, D. C. (2011). Journals for certification, conferences for rapid dissemination. Communications of the ACM, 54(8), 36–38.
9. Hermenegildo, M. (2012). Conferences versus journals in CS, what to do? Evolutionary ways forward and the ICLP/TPLP model. In: Dagstuhl seminar 12452—perspectives workshop: Publication culture in computing research.
10. Jagadish, H. V. (2008). The conference reviewing crisis and a proposed solution. ACM SIGMOD Record, 37(3), 40–45.
11. van Leeuwen, J. (2012).Where to send your paper? In: Dagstuhl seminar 12452—perspectives workshop: Publication culture in computing research.
12. Lindsey, D. (1989). Using citation counts as a measure of quality in science measuring what’s measurable rather than what’s valid. Scientometrics, 15(3–4), 189–203.
13. Meyer, B., Choppy, C., Staunstrup, J., & van Leeuwen, J. (2009). Viewpoint: Research evaluation for computer science. Communications of the ACM, 52(4), 31–34.
14. Moed, H. F. (2005). Citation analysis in research evaluation, information science and knowledge management (Vol. 9). Dordrech: Springer.
15. Montesi, M., & Owen, J. M. (2008). From conference to journal publication: How conference papers in software engineering are extended for publication in journals. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(5), 816–829.
16. Sheskin, D. J. (2011). Handbook of parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
17. Smirnov, N. V. (1939). Estimate of deviation between empirical distribution functions in two independent samples. Bulletin Moscow University, 2, 3–16.
18. Vanclay, J. K. (2011). An evaluation of the Australian Research Council’s journal ranking. Journal of Informetrics, 5(2), 265–274.
19. Vardi, M. Y. (2009). Conferences versus journals in computing research. Communications of the ACM, 52(5), 5–5.
20. Vasilescu, B., Serebrenik, A., Mens, T., van den Brand, M. G., & Pek, E. (2014). How healthy are software engineering conferences? Science of Computer Programming, 89(Part C), 251–272.
21. Wainer, J., Eckmann, M., Goldenstein, S., & Rocha, A. (2013). How productivity and impact differ across computer science subareas. Communications of the ACM, 56(8), 67–73.