Screening of the aerodynamic and biophysical properties of barley malt

International Agrophysics

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 457-464

  Ghodsvali, Alireza ^a   Farzaneh, Vahid ^b   Bakhshabadi, Hamid ^c   Zare, Zahra ^d   Karami, Zahra ^e   Mokhtarian, Mohsen ^f   Carvalho, Isabel S ^b  

^a Golestan's Agricultural and Natural Resources Research Center   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALGARVE   (Portugal)

^c ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^d ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^e ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^f ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

ANN; barley; correlation coefficient; malting; RSM

Indexed keywords

AERODYNAMICS; ARTIFICIAL NEURAL NETWORK; BARLEY; BIOPHYSICS; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CORRELATION; DEHYDRATION; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; EQUIPMENT; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; OPTIMIZATION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY;

HORDEUM;

EID: 84996899118     PISSN: 02368722     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/intag-2016-0017     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Agu R.C. and Palmer G.H., 2003. Pattern of nitrogen distribution in barley grains grown in the field. J. I. Brewing., 109(2), 110-113.
2. Arab Amerian F., 2011. Inspecting the Effect of Steeping and Germination Periods on the amount of Enzyme activity in Barley Seed (in Persian). Islamic Azad University of Sabzevar, Sabzevar, Iran.
3. Baş D. and Boyaci I.H., 2007. Modeling and optimization I: Usability of response surface methodology. J. Food. Eng., 78(3), 836-845.
4. Briggs D.E., 1998. Malt and Malting. London: Blackie Academic and Professional, UK.
5. Briggs D.E., Hough J.S., Stevens R., and Young T.W., 1991. Malting and Brewing Science: Malt and Sweet Wort. London, Chapman and Hall.
6. Celus I., Brijs K., and Delcour J.A., 2006. The effects of malting and mashing on barley protein extractability. J. Cereal. Sci., 44(2), 203-211.
7. Dendy D.A.V. and Dobraszczyk B.J., 2001. Cereals and Cereal Products, Chemistry and Technology. Maryland, USA, Aspen Publishers Inc., Gaitsburg.
8. Dolatabadi Z., Elhami Rad A.H., Farzaneh V., Akhlaghi Feizabad S.H., Estiri S.H., and Bakhshabadi H., 2016. Modeling of the lycopene extraction from tomato pulps. Food. Chem., 190(0), 968-973.
9. Draper N.R., 1992. Introduction to Box and Wilson (1951) On the Experimental Attainment of Optimum Conditions. In: Breakthroughs in Statistics: Methodology and Distribution (Eds S. Kotz, N.L. Johnson). Springer, New York, USA.
10. Eneje L.O., Ogu E.O., Aloh C.U., Odibo F.J.C., Agu R.C., and Palmer G.H., 2004. Effect of steeping and germination time on malting performance of Nigerian white and yellow maize varieties. Process. Biochem., 39(8), 1013-1016.
11. Farzaneh V. and Carvalho I.S., 2015. A review of the health benefit potentials of herbal plant infusions and their mechanism of actions. Ind. Crop. Prod., 65, 247-258.
12. Goñi S.M., Oddone S., Segura JA., Mascheroni R.H., and Salvadori V.O., 2008. Prediction of foods freezing and thawing times: Artificial neural networks and genetic algorithm approach. J. Food. Eng., 84(1), 164-178.
13. Hill W.J. and Hunter W.G., 1966. A Review Of Response surface Methodology: A Literature Survey. Techometrics, 8(4), 571-590.
14. Home S., Stenholm K., Wilhelmson A., and Autio K., 1998. Properties of starch and cell wall components and their effects on processing. Cereal. Chem., 75, 4.
15. Hossieni ghaboss S.H., 2004. Inspecting of malting quality of barley varieties and lines in Golestan province (in Persian). Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran, Iran.
16. Jabrayili S., Farzaneh V., Zare Z., Bakhshabadi H., Babazadeh Z., Mokhtarian M., Carvalho S.I., 2016. Modelling of mass transfer kinetic in osmotic dehydration of kiwifruit. Int. Agrophys., 30(2), 185-191.
17. Kashaninejad M., Mortazavi A., Safekordi A., and Tabil L.G., 2006. Some physical properties of Pistachio (Pistacia vera L.) nut and its kernel. J. Food. Eng., 72(1), 30-38.
18. Koc A.B., Heinemann P.H., and Ziegler G.R., 2007. Optimization of whole milk powder processing variables with neural networks and genetic algorithms. Food. Bioprod. Process., 85(4), 336-343.
19. Lamorski K., Pachepsky Y., Sławiński C., and Walczak R.T., 2008. Using support vector machines to develop pedotransfer functions for water retention of soils in Poland. Soil. Sci. Soc. Am. J., 72(5), 1243-1247.
20. Madadlou A., Emam-Djomeh Z., Mousavi M.E., Ehsani M., Javanmard M., and Sheehan D., 2009. Response surface optimization of an artificial neural network for predicting the size of re-Assembled casein micelles. Comput. Electron. Agr., 68(2), 216-221.
21. Mateo F., Gadea R., Mateo E.M., and Jiménez M., 2011. Multilayer perceptron neural networks and radial-basis function networks as tools to forecast accumulation of deoxynivalenol in barley seeds contaminated with Fusarium culmorum. Food. Control., 22(1), 88-95.
22. McCleary B.V. and Shameer I., 1987. Assay of malt β-Glucanase using azo-barley glucan: An improved presipitant. J. I. Brewing., 93(2), 87-90.
23. Menlik T., Özdemir M.B., and Kirmaci V., 2010. Determination of freeze-drying behaviors of apples by artificial neural network. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(12), 7669-7677.
24. Momenzadeh L., Zomorodian A., and Mowla D., 2011. Experimental and theoretical investigation of shelled corn drying in a microwave-Assisted fluidized bed dryer using Artificial Neural Network. Food. Bioprod. Process., 89(1), 15-21.
25. Razavi M.A. and Akbari R., 1998. Biochemical characteristics of agricultural products and nutrients (in Persian). Ferdowsi University Press.
26. Rostami M., Farzaneh V., Boujmehrani A., Mohammadi M., and Bakhshabadi H., 2014. Optimizing the extraction process of sesame seeds oil using response surface method on the industrial scale. Ind. Crop. Prod., 58, 160-165.
27. Tian B., Xie B., Shi J., Wu J., Cai Y., Xu T., Xue S., and Deng Q., 2010. Physicochemical changes of oat seeds during germination. Food. Chem., 119(3), 1195-1200.
28. USDA, 2010. United States Department of Agriculture. Foreign Agricultural Service. Office of Global Analysis. Washington, DC, USA International Production Assessment Division.