Automation, big data, and politics: A research review

International Journal of Communication

Volumn 10, Issue , 2016, Pages 5032-5055

  Shorey, Samantha ^a   Howard, Philip N ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Automation; Big data; Critical; Literature review; Politics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996683220     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19328036     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (139)

1. Abokhodair, N., Yoo, D., & McDonald, D. W. (2015). Dissecting a social botnet: Growth, content and influence in Twitter. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing (pp. 839-851). New York, NY: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2675133.2675208
2. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Federal Bureau of Investigation, & United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Research Institute. (2014). National and transnational security implications of big data in the life sciences. AAAS.org. Retrieved from http://www.aaas.org/sites/default/files/AAAS-FBI-UNICRI_Big_Data_Report_111014.pdf
3. Amoore, L. (2009). Algorithmic war: Everyday geographies of the war on terror. Antipode, 41(1), 49-69. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2008.00655.x
4. Ananny, M., & Crawford, K. (2014). A liminal press: Situating news app designers within a field of networked news production. SSRN. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2448736
5. Anderson, C. W. (2011). Deliberative, agonistic, and algorithmic audiences: Journalism's vision of its public in an age of audience transparency. International Journal of Communication, 5, 529-547
6. Anderson, C. W. (2013). Towards a sociology of computational and algorithmic journalism. New Media & Society, 15(7), 1005-1021. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812465137
7. Aneesh, A. (2009). Global labor: Algocratic modes of organization. Sociological Theory, 27(4), 347-370. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9558.2009.01352.x
8. Auerbach, D. (2013, February 13). You are what you click: On microtargeting. The Nation. Retrieved from http://www.thenation.com/article/you-are-what-you-click-microtargeting/
9. Baker, P., & Potts, A. (2013). 'Why do White people have thin lips?' Google and the perpetuation of stereotypes via auto-complete search forms. Critical Discourse Studies, 10(2), 187-204. http://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2012.744320
10. Barnes, T. J., & Wilson, M. W. (2014). Big data, social physics, and spatial analysis: The early years. Big Data & Society, 1(1). http://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714535365
11. Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. (2014, August 6). Losing out on employment because of data mining. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/08/06/is-big-data-spreading-inequality
12. Barocas, S., & Selbst, A. D. (2015). Big data's disparate impact. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2477899
13. Benthall, S. (2015). Designing networked publics for communicative action. Interface, 1(1). http://doi.org/10.7710/2373-4914.1003
14. Bessis, N., & Dobre, C. (2014). Big data and Internet of things: A roadmap for smart environments. New York, NY: Springer
15. Beunza, D., & Millo, Y. (2014). Blended automation: Integrating algorithms on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange. Systemic Risk Centre. Retrieved from http://www.systemicrisk.ac.uk/ publications/discussion-papers/blended-automation-integrating-algorithms-floor-new-york-stock
16. Bond, R. M., Fariss, C. J., Jones, J. J., Kramer, A. D. I., Marlow, C., Settle, J. E., & Fowler, J. H. (2012). A 61 million-person experiment in social influence and political mobilization. Nature, 489(7415), 295-298. http://doi.org/10.1038/nature11421
17. Boshmaf, Y., Muslukhov, I., Beznosov, K., & Ripeanu, M. (2011). The socialbot network: When bots socialize for fame and money. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference (pp. 93-102). Orlando, FL: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2076732.2076746
18. boyd, d., & Crawford, K. (2012). Critical questions for big data. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 662-679. http://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878
19. boyd, d., Levy, K., & Marwick, A. (2014). The networked nature of algorithmic discrimination. In S. P. Gangadharan, V. Eubanks, & S. Barocas (Eds.), Data and discrimination: Collected essays (pp. 53-57). Washington, DC: Open Technology Institute at The New America Foundation
20. Bozdag, E. (2013). Bias in algorithmic filtering and personalization. Ethics and Information Technology, 15(3), 209-227. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-013-9321-6
21. Brayne, S., Rosenblat, A., & boyd, d. (2015). Predictive policing. Data & Society Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.datacivilrights.org/pubs/2015-1027/Predictive_Policing.pdf
22. Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on the top? Algorithmic power and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media & Society, 14(2), 1164-1180. http://doi.org/10.1177/1461444812440159
23. Butler, D. (2013). When Google got flu wrong. Nature, 494(7436), 155-156. http://doi.org/10.1038/494155a
24. Calabresi, M. (2014, July 31). Statistics can predict criminal risk. Can they deliver equal justice? TIME. Retrieved from http://time.com/3061893/holder-to-oppose-data-driven-sentencing/
25. Calo, R. (2014). Robotics and the lessons of cyberlaw. California Law Review, 103(3). Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2402972
26. Caplan, R., & Reed, L. (2016). Who controls the public sphere in an era of algorithms? Data & Society Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.datasociety.net/pubs/ap/ CaseStudies_PublicSphere_2016.pdf
27. Chen, A. (2014, October 23). The laborers who keep dick pics and beheadings out of your Facebook feed. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2014/10/content-moderation/
28. Chideya, F. (2015, June 27). No child left un-mined? Student privacy at risk in the age of big data. The Intercept. Retrieved from http://theintercept.com/2015/06/27/child-left-un-mined/
29. Choi-Fitzpatrick, A. (2014). Drones for good: Technological innovations, social movements, and the state. Journal of International Affairs, 68(1), 19
30. Citron, D. K., & Pasquale, F. A. (2014). The scored society: Due process for automated predictions. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2376209
31. Crawford, K., Gray, M. L., & Miltner, K. (2014). Critiquing big data: Politics, ethics, epistemology. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1663-1672. Retrieved from http://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/2167/1164
32. Crawford, K., & Schultz, J. (2014). Big data and due process: Toward a framework to redress predictive privacy harms. Boston College Law Review, 55(1), 93-128. Retrieved from http://bclawreview.org/review/55_1/03_crawford_schultz/
33. Crosman, P. (2015, October 19). Tracking bank customers online: Necessary, stalkerish, or both? American Banker. Retrieved from http://www.americanbanker.com/news/bank-technology/tracking-bank-customers-online-necessary-stalkerish-or-both-1077310-1.html
34. Dalton, C., & Thatcher, J. (2014). What does a critical data studies look like, and why do we care? Seven points for a critical approach to 'big data.' Society and Space. Retrieved from https://societyandspace.com/material/commentaries/craig-dalton-and-jim-thatcher-what-does-a-critical-data-studies-look-like-and-why-do-we-care-seven-points-for-a-critical-approach-to-big-data/
35. Dalton, C. M. (2013). Sovereigns, spooks, and hackers: An early history of Google geo services and map mashups. Cartographica, 48(4), 261-274. http://doi.org/10.31.38/carto.48.4.1621
36. de Montjoye, Y. A., Radaelli, L., Singh, V. K., & Pentland, A. (2015). Unique in the shopping mall: On the reidentifiability of credit card metadata. Science, 347(6221), 536-539. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1256297
37. Diakopoulos, N. (2013a). Algorithmic accountability reporting: On the investigation of black boxes. Tow Center for Digital Journalism. Retrieved from http://towcenter.org/algorithmic-accountability-2/
38. Diakopoulos, N. (2013b, October 3). Rage against the algorithms. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2013/10/rage-against-the-algorithms/280255/
39. Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., & Zemel, R. (2011). Fairness through awareness. arXiv. Retrieved from http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.3913
40. Edelman, B. G., & Luca, M. (2014). Digital discrimination: The case of Airbnb.com. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2377353
41. Edelman, B. G., Luca, M., & Svirsky, D. (2016). Racial discrimination in the sharing economy: Evidence from a field experiment. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2701902
42. Ekbia, H., & Nardi, B. (2014). Heteromation and its (dis)contents: The invisible division of labor between humans and machines. First Monday, 19(6). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/5331
43. Epstein, R. (2015, August 19). How Google could rig the 2016 election. Politico. Retrieved from http://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2015/08/how-google-could-rig-the-2016-election-121548.html
44. Eubanks, V. (2015, April 30). The policy machine. Slate. Retrieved from http://www.slate.com/articles/ technology/future_tense/2015/04/the_dangers_of_letting_algorithms_enforce:policy.html
45. Ford, J. (1988). The indebted society: Credit and default in the 1980s. London, UK: Routledge
46. Ford, R. T. (2000). Save the robots: Cyber profiling and your so-called life. Stanford Law Review, 52(5), 1573-1584. http://doi.org/10.2307/1229522
47. Franceschi-Bicchierai, L. (2015, June 30). Up to 24 million Instagram accounts are spambots, study says. Motherboard. Retrieved from http://motherboard.vice.com/read/24-million-instagram-accounts-spambots-study
48. Gangadharan, S. P. (2014, August 6). The dangers of high-tech profiling, using big data. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/roomfordebate/2014/08/06/is-big-data-spreading-inequality
49. Gates, K. (2011). Our biometric future: Facial recognition technology and the culture of surveillance. New York, NY: New York University Press
50. Gillespie, T. (2012). Can an algorithm be wrong? Limn, 1(2). Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/0jk9k4hj
51. Gillespie, T. (2016). Algorithm. In B. Peters (Ed.), Digital keywords: A vocabulary of information society and culture (pp. 18-30). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
52. Gillespie, T., & Seaver, N. (2015, November 9). Critical algorithm studies: A reading list. Microsoft Research Social Media Collective. Retrieved from http://socialmediacollective.org/reading-lists/critical-algorithm-studies/
53. Gottfried, J., & Shearer, E. (2016, May 26). News use across social media platforms 2016. Journalism.org. Retrieved from http://www.journalism.org/2016/05/26/news-use-across-social-media-platforms-2016/
54. Graham, S., & Wood, D. (2003). Digitizing surveillance: Categorization, space, inequality. Critical Social Policy, 23(2), 227-248. http://doi.org/10.1177/0261018303023002006
55. Granka, L. A. (2010). The politics of search: A decade retrospective. The Information Society, 26(5), 364-374. http://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2010.511560
56. Greenfield, A. (2015, June 29). Uber, or: The technics and politics of socially corrosive mobility. Speedbird.wordpress.com. Retrieved from https://speedbird.wordpress.com/2015/06/29/uber-or-the-technics-and-politics-of-socially-corrosive-mobility/
57. Greengard, S. (2015). The Internet of things. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
58. Guilbeault, D. (2016). New approaches to bot security: An ecological view of bot agency [this Special Section]. International Journal of Communication, 10
59. Gurevich, Y. (2011, June). What is an algorithm? Microsoft Research. Retrieved from http://research.microsoft.com/pubs/155608/209-3.pdf#page=1&zoom=auto,-44,792
60. Hackman, R. (2015, April 23). Is the online surveillance of Black teenagers the new stop-and-frisk? The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/apr/23/online-surveillance-black-teenagers-new-stop-and-frisk
61. Haklay, M. (2013). Neogeography and the delusion of democratization. Environment and Planning, 45(1), 55-69
62. Hannak, A., Mislove, A., Soeller, G., Wilson, C., & Lazer, D. (2014). Measuring price discrimination and steering on e-commerce Web sites. In The Internet Measurement Conference. Retrieved from http://www.ccs.neu.edu/home/cbw/pdf/imc151-hannak.pdf
63. Hart, V., & Case, N. (2014). Parable of the polygons. Retrieved from http://ncase.me/polygons
64. Howard, P. N. (2006). New media campaigns and the managed citizen. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
65. Howard, P. N. (2015). Pax technica: How the Internet of things may set us free or lock us up. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
66. Howard, P. N., Shorey, S., Woolley, S. C., & Guo, M. (2016). Creativity and critique: Gap analysis of support for critical research on big data (Working Paper No. 2016.2, p. 44). Oxford, UK: Project on Computational Propaganda. Retrieved from http://politicalbots.org/?p=538
67. Incapsula. (2015). 2015 bot traffic report. Retrieved from https://www.incapsula.com/blog/bot-traffic-report-2015.html
68. Introna, L., & Nissenbaum, H. (2000). Shaping the Web: Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society, 16(3), 169-185. http://doi.org/10.1080/01972240050133634
69. Introna, L., & Wood, D. (2002). Picturing algorithmic surveillance: The politics of facial recognition systems. Surveillance & Society, 2(2/3). Retrieved from http://library.queensu.ca/ ojs/index.php/surveillance-and-society/article/view/3373
70. Issenberg, S. (2012, December 19). A more perfect union: How Obama's team used big data to rally voters. Retrieved from https://www.technologyreview.com/s/508836/how-obama-used-big-data-to-rally-voters-part-1/
71. Karppi, T., & Crawford, K. (2015). Social media, financial algorithms and the hack crash. Theory, Culture & Society, 33(1), 73-92 http://doi.org/10.1177/0263276415583139
72. Kay, M., Matuszek, C., & Munson, S. A. (2015). Unequal representation and gender stereotypes in image search results for occupations. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 3819-3828). Soeul, South Korea. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702520
73. Keller, M., & Neufeld, J. (2014, October 30). Terms of service: Understanding our role in the world of Big Data. Al Jazeera. Retrieved from http://projects.aljazeera.com/2014/terms-of-service/
74. King, G., Pan, J., & Roberts, M. E. (2016, July 27). How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for strategic distraction, not engaged argument. Gking.Harvard.edu. Retrieved from http://gking.harvard.edu/50c
75. Kitchin, R., & Dodge, M. (2011). Code/space: Software and everyday life. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
76. Kreiss, D. (2016). Prototype politics: Technology-intensive campaigning and the data of democracy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press
77. Larson, S. (2016, May 23). The futures of many prison inmates depend on racially biased algorithms. Dailydot.com. Retrieved from http://www.dailydot.com/debug/racist-algorithms-predictive-policing-software-bias-propublica-study/
78. Lazer, D., Kennedy, R., King, G., & Vespignani, A. (2014). The parable of Google flu: Traps in big data analysis. Science, 343(6176), 1203-1205. http://doi.org/10.1126/science.1248506
79. Lee, M. K., Kusbit, D., Metsky, E., & Dabbish, L. (2015). Working with machines: The impact of algorithmic and data-driven management on human workers. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1603-1612). New York, NY: ACM. http://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702548
80. Lenglet, M. (2011). Conflicting codes and codings: How algorithmic trading is reshaping financial regulation. Theory, Culture & Society, 28(6), 44-66. http://doi.org/10.1177/0263276411417444
81. Levy, K. E. C. (2015). The contexts of control: Information, power, and truck-driving work. The Information Society, 31(2), 160-174. http://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2015.998105
82. Lewis, S. C. (2015). Journalism in an era of big data. Digital Journalism, 3(3), 321-330. http://doi.org/10.1080/21670811.2014.976399
83. Leyshon, A., French, S., Thrift, N., Crewe, L., & Webb, P. (2005). Accounting for e-commerce: Abstractions, virtualism and the cultural circuit of capital. Economy and Society, 34(3), 428-450. http://doi.org/10.1080/03085140500112160
84. Lichterman, J. (2016, March 17). The Financial Times is launching a new analytics tool to make metrics more understandable for its newsroom. Niemanlab.org. Retrieved from http://www.niemanlab.org/2016/03/the-ft-is-launching-a-new-analytics-tool-to-make-metrics-more-understandable-for-its-newsroom/
85. Lyon, D. (2014). Surveillance, Snowden, and big data: Capacities, consequences, critique. Big Data & Society, 1(2), 1-13. http://doi.org/10.1177/2053951714541861
86. MacKenzie, D. (2006). An engine, not a camera: How financial models shape markets. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
87. MacKenzie, D. (2014, February). A sociology of algorithms: High frequency trading and the shaping of markets. School of Social and Political Science, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. Retrieved from http://www.sps.ed.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0004/156298/Algorithms25.pdf
88. Margetts, H., John, P., Hale, S., & Yasseri, T. (2015). Political turbulence: How social media shape collective action. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press
89. McQuillan, D. (2015). Algorithmic states of exception. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4/5), 564-576
90. Medina, E. (2015). Rethinking algorithmic regulation. Kybernetes, 44(6/7), 1005-1019. http://doi.org/10.1108/K-02-2015-0052
91. Mittelstadt, B. (2016). Auditing for transparency in content personalization systems [this Special section]. International Journal of Communication, 10
92. Mui, Y. Q. (2011, July 16). Little-known firms tracking data used in credit scores. The Washington Post. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/little-known-firms-tracking-data-used-in-credit-scores/2011/05/24/gIQAXHcWII_story.html
93. Muniesa, F. (2014). Discovering stock prices. London, UK: Routledge
94. Neff, G., & Nafus, D. (2016). Self-tracking. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
95. Neyland, D. (2016). Bearing account-able witness to the ethical algorithmic system. Science, Technology & Human Values, 41(1), 50-76. http://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915598056
96. Noble, S. U. (2012, March 8). Missed connections: What search engines say about women. Bitch Magazine, (54). Retrieved from http://safiyaunoble.com/2012/03/08/bitch-magazine-article/
97. Noyes, K. (2015, January 15). Will big data help end discrimination-or make it worse? Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2015/01/15/will-big-data-help-end-discrimination-or-make-it-worse/
98. O'Connor, S. (2015, June 8). Wearables at work: The new frontier of employee surveillance. Financial Times. Retrieved from http://www.ft.com/intl/cms/s/2/d7eee768-0b65-11e5-994d-00144feabdc0.html#axzz3oa0EbvZv
99. O'Neil, C. (2013, March 31). Value-added model doesn't find bad teachers, causes administrators to cheat. Mathbabe.org. Retrieved from http://mathbabe.org/2013/03/31/value-added-model-doesnt-find-bad-teachers-causes-administrators-to-cheat/
100. O'Neil, C. (2016). Weapons of math destruction: How big data increases inequality and threatens democracy. New York, NY: Crown Press
101. O'Reilly, T. (2013). Open data and algorithmic regulation. In B. Goldstein & L. Dyson (Eds.), Beyond transparency: Open data and the future of civic innovation (pp. 289-300). San Francisco, CA: Code for America Press
102. Palacios, L. D. (2014, October 31). The dangers of evidence-based sentencing. Thegovlab.org. Retrieved from http://thegovlab.org/the-dangers-of-evidence-based-sentencing/
103. Pariser, E. (2013). The filter bubble: How the new personalized Web is changing what we read and how we think. New York, NY: Penguin Books
104. Pasquale, F. (2015). The black box society: The secret algorithms that control money and information. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
105. Pearce, R. (2013, May 28). Big data is BS: Obama campaign CTO. CIO. Retrieved from http://www.cio.com.au/article/462961/big_data_bs_obama_campaign_cto/
106. Peck, D. (2013, December). They're watching you at work. The Atlantic. Retrieved from http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2013/12/theyre-watching-you-at-work/354681/
107. Powell, A. (2014). Datafication, transparency, and good governance of the data city. In K. O'Hara, C. Nguyen, & P. Haynes (Eds.), Digital enlightenment yearbook 2014: Social networks and social machines, surveillance and empowerment (pp. 215-224). Burke, VA: IOS Press
108. Reigeluth, T. B. (2014). Why data is not enough: Digital traces as control of self and self-control. Surveillance & Society, 12(2), 243-254
109. Rosenblat, A., Kneese, T., & boyd, d. (2014). Workshop primer: Algorithmic accountability. Data & Society Research Institute. Retrieved from http://www.datasociety.net/pubs/2014-0317/AlgorithmicAccountabilityPrimer.pdf
110. Sandvig, C., Hamilton, K., Karahalios, K., & Langbort, C. (2016). When the algorithm itself is a racist: Diagnosing ethical harm in the basic components of software. International Journal of Communication, 10(Special Section). Retrieved from ijoc.org
111. Sandvig v. Lynch. (2016). Retrieved from https://www.aclu.org/legal-document/sandvig-v-lynch-complaint
112. Scannell, J. (2015). What can an algorithm do? DIS Magazine. Retrieved from http://dismagazine.com/discussion/72975/josh-scannell-what-can-an-algorithm-do/
113. Schramm, W. (1983). The unique perspective of communication: A retrospective view. Journal of Communication, 33(3), 6-17
114. Shah, V. (2013, August 28). Map of stop and frisks in New York City show concentration by race and neighborhood. Untapped Cities. Retrieved from http://untappedcities.com/2013/08/28/new-map-shows-police-stop-and-frisks-according-to-race-and-neighbourhood-in-new-york-city/
115. Sifry, M. (2014, October 31). Facebook wants you to vote on Tuesday: Here's how it messed with your feed in 2012. Mother Jones. Retrieved from http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2014/10/can-voting-facebook-button-improve-voter-turnout
116. Singer, N. (2015, June 4). Sharing data, but not happily. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/05/technology/consumers-conflicted-over-data-mining-policies-report-finds.html
117. Snider, L. (2014). Interrogating the algorithm: Debt, derivatives and the social reconstruction of stock market trading. Critical Sociology, 40(5), 747-761. http://doi.org/10.1177/0896920513504603
118. Starr, S. B. (2013). Evidence-based sentencing and the scientific rationalization of discrimination. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2318940
119. Steiner, C. (2013). Automate this: How algorithms took over our markets, our jobs, and the world. New York, NY: Portfolio
120. Strauss, V. (2014, November 22). Principal uncovers flawed data in her state's official education reports. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/answer-sheet/wp/2014/11/22/principal-uncovers-flawed-data-in-her-states-official-education-reports/
121. Stroud, M. (2014, February 19). The minority report: Chicago's new police computer predicts crimes, but is it racist? The Verge. Retrieved from http://www.theverge.com/2014/2/19/5419854/the-minority-report-this-computer-predicts-crime-but-is-it-racist
122. Sweeney, L. (2013). Discrimination in online ad delivery. Social Science Research Network. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2208240
123. Thatcher, J. (2014). Living on fumes: Digital footprints, data fumes, and the limitations of spatial big data. International Journal of Communication, 8, 1766-1783
124. Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond Facebook and Google: Emergent challenges of computational agency. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 13, 203-218
125. Tufekci, Z., & King, B. (2014, December 7). We can't trust Uber. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/12/08/opinion/we-cant-trust-uber.html
126. Turow, J. (2011). The daily you: How the new advertising industry is defining your identity and your worth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press
127. Turow, J., Hennessy, M., & Draper, N. (2015). The tradeoff fallacy: How marketers are misrepresenting American consumers and opening them up to exploitation. University of Pennsylvania. Retrieved from https://www.asc.upenn.edu/sites/default/files/TradeoffFallacy_1.pdf
128. Turow, J., McGuigan, L., & Maris, E. R. (2015). Making data mining a natural part of life: Physical retailing, customer surveillance and the 21st century social imaginary. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 18(4-5), 464-478. http://doi.org/10.1177/1367549415577390
129. Upturn. (2014). Civil rights, big data, and our algorithmic future. Bigdata.fairness.io. Retrieved from https://bigdata.fairness.io/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2015-04-20-Civil-Rights-Big-Data-and-Our-Algorithmic-Future-v1.2.pdf
130. Vaccari, C., Chadwick, A., & O'Loughlin, B. (2015). Dual screening the political: Media events, social media, and citizen engagement. Journal of Communication, 65(6), 1041-1061. http://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12187
131. Van Couvering, E. (2007). Is relevance relevant? Market, science, and war: Discourses of search engine quality. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12(3), 866-887. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00354.x
132. van Rijmenam, M. (2015, April 15). The Los Angeles Police Department is predicting and fighting crime with big data. DataFloq.com. Retrieved from https://datafloq.com/read/los-angeles-police-department-predicts-fights-crim/279
133. Weber, L., & Dwoskin, E. (2014, September 30). Are workplace personality tests fair? The Wall Street Journal. Retrieved from http://www.wsj.com/articles/are-workplace-personality-tests-fair-1412044257
134. White House. (2014). Big data: Seizing opportunities, preserving values. CFR.org. Retrieved from http://www.cfr.org/technology-and-science/white-house-big-data-seizing-opportunities-preserving-values/p32916
135. Wihbey, J. (2015, January 14). The possibilities of digital discrimination: Research on e-commerce, algorithms and big data. Retrieved from http://journalistsresource.org/studies/society/internet/ possibilities-online-racial-discrimination-research-airbnb
136. Woolley, S. (2016). Automating power: Social bot interference in global politics. First Monday, 21(4). http://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i4.6161
137. Woolley, S., & Howard, P. (2016, May 15). Bots unite to automate the presidential election. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2016/05/twitterbots-2/
138. Zarsky, T. (2015). The trouble with algorithmic decisions: An analytic road map to examine efficiency and fairness in automated and opaque decision making. Science, Technology & Human Values, 41(1), 118-132. http://doi.org/10.1177/0162243915605575
139. Zukin, S., Lindeman, S., & Hurson, L. (2015). The omnivore's neighborhood? Online restaurant reviews, race, and gentrification. Journal of Consumer Culture, 1-21. http://doi.org/10.1177/1469540515611203