Applying models to national surveys of undergraduate science students: What affects ratings of satisfaction?

Education Sciences

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 193-207

  Langan, Anthony Mark ^a   Dunleavy, Peter ^a   Fielding, Alan ^a  

^a MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Data mining; Random forest analysis; Student satisfaction; Student surveys

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996443796     PISSN: None     EISSN: 22277102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/educsci3020193     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Chalmers, D.; Lee, K.; Walker, B. International and National Quality Teaching and Learning Performance Models Currently in Use, 2008. Available online: http://www.catl.uwa.edu.au/projects/tqi (accessed on 23 February 2013).
2. Hewson, P. Preliminary Analysis of the National Student Survey. MSOR Connections Vol 11, No 1 Spring Term 2011. Available online: http://www-new1.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/subjects/msor/Hewson.pdf (accessed on 23 February 2013).
3. O’Neill, M.; Palmer, A. Cognitive dissonance and the stability of service quality perceptions. J. Serv. Market. 2004, 18, 433–449.
4. Fielding, A.H.; Dunleavy, P.J.; Langan, A.M. Effective use of the UK’s National Student (Satisfaction) Survey (NSS) data in science and engineering subjects. J. Furth. High. Educ. 2010, 33, 347–368.
5. Giese, J.L.; Cote, J.A. Defining customer satisfaction. Acad. Market. Sci. Rev. 2000, 1, 1–34.
6. Garcia-Aracil, A. European graduates’ level of satisfaction with higher education. High. Educ. 2009, 57, 1–21.
7. Ramsden, P. A performance indicator of teaching quality in higher education: The course experience questionnaire. Stud. High. Educ. 1991, 16, 129–150.
8. Richardson, J.T.E. Instruments for obtaining student feedback: A review of the literature. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 2005, 30, 387–415.
9. Gibbs, G. Dimensions of Quality; Higher Education Academy: York, UK, 2010.
10. Curtis, P. Student survey is bland and worthless, claims academic. Educ. Guard. 2008. Available online: http://www.guardian.co.uk/education/2008/jun/12/highereducation.uk2 (accessed on 23 February 2013).
11. Brown, S. Bringing about positive change in the higher education student experience: A case study. Qual. Assur. Educ. 2011, 19, 195–207.
12. Ainley, J.; Long, M. The Course Experience Survey 1992 Graduates; Australian Government Publishing Service: Canberra, Australia, 1994.
13. Brennan, J.; Williams, R.; Brighton, R.; Moon, N.; Richardson, J.; Rindl, J. Collecting and Using Student Feedback on Quality and Standards of Learning and Teaching in Higher Education; Higher Education Funding Council for England: London, UK, 2003. Available online: www.hefce.ac.uk/Pubs/rdreports/2003/rd08_03/rd08_03.pdf (accessed on 23 February 2013).
14. Surridge, P. Interpreting the National Student Survey Data Using Multi-Level Modelling. A Non-Technical Guide; The Higher Education Academy: York, UK, 2008. Available online: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/York/documents/ourwork/research/NSS_interpreting_data_ nontechnical_guide.pdf (accessed on 23 February 2013).
15. Thomas, E.H.; Galambos, N. What satisfies students? Mining student-opinion data with regression and decision tree analysis. Res. High. Educ. 2004, 45, 251–269.
16. Breiman, L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45, 5–32.
17. Breiman, L. Statistical modelling: The two cultures. Stat. Sci. 2001, 16, 199–215.
18. Breiman, L. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 1996, 24, 123–140.
19. Breiman, L.; Cutler, A. Interface Workshop–April 2004. 2004. Available online: http://stat-www.berkeley.edu/users/breiman/RandomForests/interface04.pdf (accessed on 23 February 2013).
20. Crawley, M.J. The R Book; John Wiley and Sons: Chichester, UK, 2007.
21. Marsh, H.W.; Cheng, J.H.S. Dimensionality, Multilevel Structure, and Differentiation at the Level of University and Discipline: Preliminary Results, 2008. Available online: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/resources/detail/ourwork/research/NSS_herb_marsh (accessed on 23 February 2013).
22. Dean, A.A. Enhancing the Learning Experience of Students in Higher Education: Key Findings from the NSS Survey (2008 to 2010) for University Business Schools in England. Report to the Higher Education Academy, Business, Accountancy and Finance Network, 2010. Available online: http://www-new1.heacademy.ac.uk/business/news/detail/2011/nss-survey-report (accessed on 23 February 2013).
23. Crawford, K.; Hagyard, A.; Saunders, G. Creative Analysis of NSS Data and Collaborative Research to Inform Good Practice in Assessment Feedback. SWAP Project Output: Higher Education Academy Social Policy and Project Work, 2010; Available online: http://www.swap.ac.uk/docs/projects/nss_report.pdf (accessed on 23 February 2013).
24. Boehler, M.L.; Rogers, D.A.; Schwind, C.J.; Mayforth, R.; Quin, J.; Williams, R.G.; Dunnington, G. An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: a randomised controlled trial. Med. Educ. 2006, 40, 746–749.
25. Richardson, J.T.E.; Slater, J.B.; Wilson, J. The national student survey: Development, findings and implications. Stud. High. Educ. 2007, 32, 557–580.
26. Emery, C.; Kramer, T.; Tian, R. Customers vs. products: Adopting an effective approach to business students. Qual. Assur. Educ. 2001, 9, 110–115.
27. Buckley, A. Making It Count: Reflecting on the National Student Survey in the Process of Enhancement; Higher Education Academy: York, UK, 2012.