E-Government Tools, Claimed Potentials/Unnamed Limitations: The Case of Kalyan–Dombivli

Environment and Urbanization Asia

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 223-234

  Martinez, Javier ^a   Pfeffer, Karin ^b   Van Dijk, Tara ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

deprivation; e government; ICT tools; Inequality; profiles of exclusion

Indexed keywords

EID: 84996154735     PISSN: 09754253     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/097542531100200206     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ABM. (2009). Project KDMC. Retrieved from http://www.abmindia.com/kdmc.html on 1 August 2011 (accessed 1 September 2009).
2. Baud I., Nainan N. (2008). ‘Negotiated spaces’ for representation in Mumbai: Ward committees, advanced locality management and the politics of middle-class activism. Environment and Urbanization, 20(2), 483–99.
3. Baud I., Pfeffer K., Sridharan N., Nainan N. (2009). Matching deprivation mapping to urban governance in three Indian mega-cities. Habitat International, 33(4), 365–77.
4. Baud I., Sridharan N., Pfeffer K. (2008). Mapping urban poverty for local governance in an Indian mega-city: The case of Delhi. Urban Studies, 45(7), 1385–412.
5. Benjamin S., Bhuvaneswari R., Rajan P. (2007). Bhoomi: E-governance or anti-politics machine necessary to globalize Bangalore. CASUM-m Working Paper.
6. Bhan G. (2009). ‘This is no longer the city I once knew’. Evictions, the urban poor and the right to the city in millennial Delhi. Environment and Urbanization, 21(1), 127–42.
7. Borja J., Castells M. (1997). Local and global: The management of cities in the information age. London: Earthscan.
8. Brenner N., Theodore N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of ‘actually existing neoliberalism’. Antipode, 34(3), 349–79.
9. Castells M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture, Vol. I. The rise of the network society. Oxford: Blackwell.
10. Castells M. (1999). The information age: Economy, society and culture: Vol. III. End of millennium. Oxford: Blackwell.
11. Cavill S., Sohail M. (2004). Strengthening accountability for urban services. Environment and Urbanization, 16(1), 155–70.
12. Chatterjee P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press.
13. Chopra R. (2003). Neoliberalism as doxa: Bourdieu's theory of the state and the contemporary Indian discourse on globalization and liberalization. Cultural Studies, 17(3), 419–44.
14. Davoudi S. (2006). Evidence-based planning; Rhetoric and reality. DISP, 165(2), 14–24.
15. Dolare S. (2007, September 29). MSEDC upsets Old Kalyan consumers. Dombivali Kalyan Plus.
16. Fernandes L., Heller P. (2006). Hegemonic aspirations—New middle class politics and India's democracy in comparative perspective. Critical Asian Studies, 38(4), 495–522.
17. Haque M.S. (2002). E-governance in India: Its impacts on relations among citizens, politicians and public servants. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 68(2), 231–50.
18. Harvey D. (2000). Spaces of hope. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
19. Harvey D. (2008). The enigma of capital. Class lecture: City university of New York. 18 Nov. Retrieved from http://www.davidharvey.org.
20. Jayasuriya K., Rodan G. (2007). Beyond hybrid regimes: More participation, less contestation in Southeast Asia. Democratization, 14(5), 773–94.
21. KDMC (Kalyan–Dombivli Municipal Corporation). (2006). City development plan for Kalyan Dombivli Municipal Corporation. Retrieved from http://www.kdmc.gov.in/html/Other_Info/cdp/cdp.pdf on 1 August 2011.
22. Marcuse P. (2009). From critical urban theory to the right to the city. City, 13(2–3), 185–97.
23. Martínez J. (2009). The use of GIS and indicators to monitor intra-urban inequalities. A case study in Rosario, Argentina. Habitat International, 33(4), 387–96.
24. Mazzarella W. (2006). Internet X-ray: E-governance, transparency, and the politics of immediation in India. Public Culture, 18(3), 473–505.
25. Pfeffer K., Baud I.S.A., Martinez J.A., Sridharan N. (2008). The role of Spatial Information Infrastructure in addressing urban deprivations in Indian cities. In Proceeding of the 2008 N-AERUS workshop: Securing positive change in international urban poverty reduction policies (p. 11). Edinburgh, 12 December 2008.
26. Ranganathan M. (2008). Grievance redressal processes in urban service delivery: How effective are they? The Governance Brief, 17, 1–8.
27. Rodan G., Jayasuriya K. (2007). The technocratic politics of administrative participation. Democratization, 14(5), 795–815.
28. Sharma S. (2008, June 7). KDMC's e-governance misleading, complains Kalyan resident. Dombivali Kalyan Plus.
29. Smith D.M. (1994). Geography and social justice. Oxford: Blackwell.
30. Taylor J., Lips A.M.B. (2008). The citizen in information polity: Exposing the limits of the e-government paradigm. Information Polity, 13(3–4), 139–52.
31. UNDP (United Nations Development Programme). (2005). The key to increasing transparency in e-government deployments. Public feedback mechanisms [Electronic Version]. APDIP e-Note 3/2005.
32. van Dijk T. (2009). Unpacking urban inequalities: The strategic relational livelihoods approach. Paper presented at the NAERUS Conference, Rotterdam.
33. Wacquant L.J.D. (2009). Punishing the poor: The neoliberal government of social insecurity. Durham NC: Duke University Press.
34. Wallack J., Nadhamuni S. (2007). User innovation and egovernance design [Electronic Version]. Retrieved from http://www.egovernments.org (accessed 10 March 2009).
35. Weber R. (2002). Extracting value from the city: Neoliberalism and urban redevelopment. Antipode, 34(3), 519–40.
36. Whitehead J., More N. (2007). Revanchism in Mumbai? Political economy of rent gaps. Economic and Political Weekly, 23 June, 2324–2428.
37. Wong C. (2006). Indicators for urban and regional planning. London: Routledge.