Evidence-based planning: Rhetoric and reality

DISP

Volumn 165, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 14-24

  Davoudi, Simin ^a,b  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLANNING SYSTEM; POLICY MAKING; STATE ROLE;

EURASIA; EUROPE; UNITED KINGDOM; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 33749396861     PISSN: 02513625     EISSN: 02513625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02513625.2006.10556951     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. ABERCROMBIE, P. (1933): Town and Country Planning. London: Oxford University Press (3rd edition).
2. BACON F. (2000): The new organon. Cambridge: Cambridge university Press.
3. BATTY, M. (1979): On Planning Process, in B. Good-all and A. Kirby (ed.) Resources and Planning. Oxford: Pergamon.
4. BARKER, K. et al. (2004): Review of Housing Supply. London: HM Treasury.
5. BLACKLER, F. (1995): Knowledge, Knowledge Work and Organisations: An Overview and Interpretation. Organisational Studies, Vol. 16(6): 1021-1046.
6. CABINET OFFICE (1999a): Modernising Government. Cm 4310, London: Stationary Office.
7. CABINET OFFICE (1999b): Professional policy making for the 21st Century, London: Cabinet Office.
8. CEC (Commission of the European Community) (2001): Governance in the EU: A White Paper. Brussels: European Commission, COM (2001) 428 final.
9. CROW, S.; HARRIS, N.; THOMAS, H. (2000): The Quality of Development Plans. Department of City and Regional Planning, Cardiff University.
10. DAVID, M.E. (2002): Themed section on evidence-based policy as a concept for modernising governance and social science research, Social Policy and Society. 1(3): 213-214.
11. DAVOUDI, S., in press: Strategic Waste Planning: the Interface between the 'technical' and the 'social', Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy.
12. DAVOUDI, S. (2006): Territorial Cohesion, European social model and spatial policy research, in A. Faludi (ed.) Territorial cohesion and European model of society. Cambridge, Mass: The Lincoln Institute for Land Policy.
13. DAVOUDI, S.; WHITNEY, D. (2005): British Planning Education: Past, Present and the Future, Urban No. 10: 17-33.
14. DENHAM, A.; GARNETT, M. (1996): The nature and impact of think tanks in contemporary Britain, in: M. D. Kandiah and A. Seldon (eds.), Ideas and Think Tanks in Contemporary Britain, Vol. 1. London: Frank Cass.
15. ELLIS, H. (2006): Review fouls up with economic overtone, Planning. 10 February: 10.
16. FALUDI, A. (1973): Planning Theory. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
17. FLYVBJERG, B. (2001) Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. GIDDENS, A. (1994): Beyond left and right: The future of radical politics. Oxford: Polity Press.
19. HALL, P. (1974); The Containment of Urban England. The Geographical Journal, Vol 4 Part 3: 386-417.
20. HALL, P.; GRACEY, H.; DREWETT, R.; THOMAS, R. (1973): The Containment of Urban England, London: Allen & Unwin.
21. HALL, P. (2002): Cities of Tomorrow (3rd. Edition). Oxford: Blackwell.
22. HCEFRA (House of Commons Environment, Food and Rural Affairs Committee), (2005): Waste Policy and the Landfill Directive, 4th Report of session 2004-05 March, HC102. London: The Stationary Office.
23. HOLLIS, M. (1994): The Philosophy of Social Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
24. KEEBLE, L. (1959): Principles and Practice of Town and Country Planning. London: The Estate Gazette.
25. KUHN, T. (1962): The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago: Ill., University of Chicago Press (2nd Edition 1970).
26. LEICESTER, G. (2002): Evidence-based Policy, available online: accessed 18.11.05 http://www.publicnet.co.uk/publicnet/fe000725.htm.
27. LINDBLOM, C.E. (1959): The science of "muddling through". Public Administration Review, 19: 79-88.
28. MINISTERIAL STATEMENT BY YVETTE COOPER MP (2005): available online: http://www.ost.gov. uk/research/forwardlook03/statements/departments/deputy_pm.htm, accessed 18/11 05.
29. NIXON, J.; WALKER, M.; BARON, S. (2002): From Washington heights to the Raploch: Evidence, mediation and the Genealogy of Policy, Social Policy and Society, Vol. 1(3): 237-246.
30. NUTLEY, S.; PERCY-SMITH, J.; SOLESBURY, W. (2003): Models of Research Impact. London: Learning and Skills Research Centre.
31. ODPM (Office of the Deputy Prime Minister) (2004): Planning Policy Statement 12: Local Development Frameworks. London: ODPM.
32. OED (1998): Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
33. OST (Office of Science and Technology) (2005): Guidelines on scientific analysis in policy making: a consultation by the government chief scientific adviser. London: OST.
34. OWENS, S.; RAYNER, T.; BINA, O. (2004): New agendas for appraisal: reflection on theory, practice and research, Environment and Planning A Vol. 36(11): 1943-1959.
35. PACKWOOD, A. (2002): Evidence-based policy: Rhetoric and reality, Social Policy and Society, 1(3): 267-72.
36. POPPER, K.R. (1959): The Logic of Scientific Discovery. London: Hutchinson.
37. READE, E.J. (1987): British Town and Country Planning. Milton Keynes: The Open University.
38. RTPI The Royal Town Planning Institute, 2003, Draft Policy Statement on Initial Planning Education. London: RTPI.
39. SCHUSTER REPORT (1950): Report of the Committee on Qualifications of Planners, Cmd 8059. London: HMSO.
40. SHULOCK N. (1999): The paradox of policy analysis: if it is not used, why do we produce so much of it? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, Vol. 18 (2): 226-244.
41. SKIDELSKY, R. (1992): John Maynard Keynes: A biography. Vol 2: The Economist as Saviour, 1920-1937. London: Macmillan.
42. SOLESBURY, W. (2002): The Ascendancy of Evidence. Planning Theory and Practice, 3(1): 90-96.
43. SMITH, A. F. M. (1996): Mad cows and ecstasy: chance and choice in an evidence-based society. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society A, Vol. 159(3): 367-383.
44. TAYLOR, N. (1998): Urban Planning Theory since 1945 London. Sage.
45. URBAN INSTITUTE (2003): The Case for Evidence-based Policy: Beyond ideology, politics and guesswork (Urban Institute Press).
46. WARD, S. (1994): Planning and Urban Change. London: Paul Chapman.
47. WEISS, C.H. (1975): Evaluation Research in the Political Context, in E.S. Struening and M. Guttentag (eds.) Handbook of Evaluation Research, Vol. 1. London: Sage, pp. 13-15.
48. WEISS, C.H. (2001): What kind of evidence in evidence-based policy? Paper presented to third international, inter-disciplinary evidence-based policies and indicator systems conference, July. University of Durham.
49. WIENER, N. (1948): Cybernetics. Cambridge. Mass: MIT Press.
50. WRIGHT, A. (2003): What is a sound plan? Planning, 4 April: 23.
51. YOUNG, K.; ASHBY D.; BOAZ, A.; GRAYSON, L. (2002): Social science and the evidence-based policy movement. Social Policy and Society, 1(3): 215-224.