Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Targeted Biopsy in Patients with a Prior Negative Biopsy: A Consensus Statement by AUA and SAR

Journal of Urology

Volumn 196, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 1613-1618

  Rosenkrantz, Andrew B ^a   Verma, Sadhna ^c   Choyke, Peter ^d   Eberhardt, Steven C ^f   Eggener, Scott E ^g   Gaitonde, Krishnanath ^c   Haider, Masoom A ^h   Margolis, Daniel J ^b   Marks, Leonard S ⁱ   Pinto, Peter ^e   Sonn, Geoffrey A ^j   Taneja, Samir S ^a  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b WEILL CORNELL MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^j STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

biopsy; consensus; magnetic resonance imaging; prostatic neoplasms

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MARKER; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; BIOPSY TECHNIQUE; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER PATIENT; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CONSENSUS; DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGIST; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; IMAGE GUIDED BIOPSY; IMAGE QUALITY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT SELECTION; PI RADS; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE; PROSTATE BIOPSY; PROSTATE CANCER; QUALITY CONTROL; REPEAT PROCEDURE; STANDARDIZATION; TRANSRECTAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; UROLOGIST; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; INTERVENTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROSTATE TUMOR;

CONSENSUS; HUMANS; IMAGE-GUIDED BIOPSY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, INTERVENTIONAL; MALE; PROSTATE; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS;

EID: 84995890787     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.06.079     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 1 Hamoen, E.H., de Rooij, M., Witjes, J.A., et al. Use of the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) for prostate cancer detection with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging: a diagnostic meta-analysis. Eur Urol, 67, 2015, 1112.
2. 2 Hoeks, C.M., Barentsz, J.O., Hambrock, T., et al. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology, 261, 2011, 46.
3. 3 Marks, L., Young, S., Natarajan, S., MRI-ultrasound fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsy. Curr Opin Urol, 23, 2013, 43.
4. 4 Futterer, J.J., Heijmink, S.W., Scheenen, T.W., et al. Prostate cancer: local staging at 3-T endorectal MR imaging–early experience. Radiology, 238, 2006, 184.
5. 5 Latchamsetty, K.C., Borden, L.S. Jr., Porter, C.R., et al. Experience improves staging accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance imaging in prostate cancer: what is the learning curve?. Can J Urol, 14, 2007, 3429.
6. 6 Seltzer, S.E., Getty, D.J., Tempany, C.M., et al. Staging prostate cancer with MR imaging: a combined radiologist-computer system. Radiology, 202, 1997, 219.
7. 7 Puech, P., Randazzo, M., Ouzzane, A., et al. How are we going to train a generation of radiologists (and urologists) to read prostate MRI?. Curr Opin Urol, 25, 2015, 522.
8. 8 American College of Radiology: Meetings/Courses: Prostate MR. Available at http://www.acr.org/meetings-events/ec-prostate-mr. Accessed November 14, 2015.
9. 9 Pepe, P., Garufi, A., Priolo, G., et al. Can 3-Tesla pelvic phased-array multiparametric MRI avoid unnecessary repeat prostate biopsy in patients with PSA < 10 ng/mL?. Clin Genitourin Cancer, 13, 2015, e27.
10. 10 Lee, S.H., Chung, M.S., Kim, J.H., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy in men with previously negative prostate biopsy results. J Endourol, 26, 2012, 787.
11. 11 Park, B.K., Lee, H.M., Kim, C.K., et al. Lesion localization in patients with a previous negative transrectal ultrasound biopsy and persistently elevated prostate specific antigen level using diffusion-weighted imaging at three Tesla before rebiopsy. Invest Radiol, 43, 2008, 789.
12. 12 Martin, P.R., Cool, D.W., Romagnoli, C., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging-targeted, 3D transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy for prostate cancer: quantifying the impact of needle delivery error on diagnosis. Med Phys, 41, 2014, 073504.
13. 13 Xu, S., Kruecker, J., Turkbey, B., et al. Real-time MRI-TRUS fusion for guidance of targeted prostate biopsies. Comput Aided Surg, 13, 2008, 255.
14. 14 Natarajan, S., Marks, L.S., Margolis, D.J., et al. Clinical application of a 3D ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy system. Urol Oncol, 29, 2011, 334.
15. 15 Kaufmann, S., Kruck, S., Kramer, U., et al. Direct comparison of targeted MRI-guided biopsy with systematic transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy in patients with previous negative prostate biopsies. Urol Int, 94, 2015, 319.
16. 16 Hambrock, T., Somford, D.M., Hoeks, C., et al. Magnetic resonance imaging guided prostate biopsy in men with repeat negative biopsies and increased prostate specific antigen. J Urol, 183, 2010, 520.
17. 17 Abdi, H., Zargar, H., Goldenberg, S.L., et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with prior negative biopsy results. Urol Oncol, 33, 2015, 165.
18. 18 Arsov, C., Rabenalt, R., Blondin, D., et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided in-bore biopsy to MRI-ultrasound fusion and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in patients with prior negative biopsies. Eur Urol, 68, 2015, 713.
19. 19 Borkowetz, A., Platzek, I., Toma, M., et al. Comparison of systematic transrectal biopsy to transperineal magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound-fusion biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. BJU Int, 116, 2015, 873.
20. 20 Meng, X., Rosenkrantz, A.B., Mendhiratta, N., et al. Relationship between prebiopsy multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), biopsy indication, and MRI-ultrasound fusion-targeted prostate biopsy outcomes. Eur Urol, 69, 2016, 512.
21. 21 Salami, S.S., Ben-Levi, E., Yaskiv, O., et al. In patients with a previous negative prostate biopsy and a suspicious lesion on magnetic resonance imaging, is a 12-core biopsy still necessary in addition to a targeted biopsy?. BJU Int, 115, 2015, 562.
22. 22 Sonn, G.A., Chang, E., Natarajan, S., et al. Value of targeted prostate biopsy using magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion in men with prior negative biopsy and elevated prostate-specific antigen. Eur Urol, 65, 2014, 809.
23. 23 Portalez, D., Mozer, P., Cornud, F., et al. Validation of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology scoring system for prostate cancer diagnosis on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging in a cohort of repeat biopsy patients. Eur Urol, 62, 2012, 986.
24. 24 Puech, P., Rouviere, O., Renard-Penna, R., et al. Prostate cancer diagnosis: multiparametric MR-targeted biopsy with cognitive and transrectal US-MR fusion guidance versus systematic biopsy–prospective multicenter study. Radiology, 268, 2013, 461.
25. 25 Wysock, J.S., Rosenkrantz, A.B., Huang, W.C., et al. A prospective, blinded comparison of magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-ultrasound fusion and visual estimation in the performance of MR-targeted prostate biopsy: the PROFUS trial. Eur Urol, 66, 2014, 343.
26. 26 Bjurlin, M.A., Carter, H.B., Schellhammer, P., et al. Optimization of initial prostate biopsy in clinical practice: sampling, labeling and specimen processing. J Urol, 189, 2013, 2039.
27. 27 Shariat, S.F., Karakiewicz, P.I., Margulis, V., et al. Inventory of prostate cancer predictive tools. Curr Opin Urol, 18, 2008, 279.
28. 28 Filson, C.P., Natarajan, S., Margolis, D.J., et al. Prostate cancer detection with magnetic resonance-ultrasound fusion biopsy: the role of systematic and targeted biopsies. Cancer, 122, 2016, 884.
29. 29 Vourganti, S., Rastinehad, A., Yerram, N.K., et al. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound fusion biopsy detect prostate cancer in patients with prior negative transrectal ultrasound biopsies. J Urol, 188, 2012, 2152.
30. 30 Weinreb, J.C., Barentsz, J.O., Choyke, P.L., et al. PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2. Eur Urol, 69, 2016, 16.