Corrigendum to: Topological Polymer Chemistry Enters Surface Science: Linear versus Cyclic Polymer Brushes (Angewandte Chemie International Edition, (2016), 55, 50, (15583-15588), 10.1002/anie.201607309);Topological Polymer Chemistry Enters Surface Science: Linear versus Cyclic Polymer Brushes

Angewandte Chemie - International Edition

Volumn 55, Issue 50, 2016, Pages 15583-15588

  Morgese, Giulia ^a   Trachsel, Lucca ^a   Romio, Matteo ^b   Divandari, Mohammad ^a   Ramakrishna, Shivaprakash N ^a   Benetti, Edmondo M ^a  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

atomic force microscopy; polymers; polyoxazoline; surface chemistry; thin films

Indexed keywords

ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY; CHEMICAL PROPERTIES; DENDRIMERS; ORGANIC POLYMERS; POLYMERS; SURFACE CHEMISTRY; THIN FILMS; TITANIUM OXIDES;

BIOLOGICAL CONTAMINATION; HYDRODYNAMIC RADIUS; POLYOXAZOLINE; PROTEIN MIXTURES; STERIC STABILIZATION; SURFACE FUNCTIONALIZATION; TOPOLOGICAL EFFECTS; TOPOLOGICAL POLYMER;

TOPOLOGY;

EID: 84995792425     PISSN: 14337851     EISSN: 15213773     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/anie.201700423     Document Type: Erratum

References (49)

1. T. Yamamoto, Y. Tezuka, Soft Matter 2015, 11, 7458–7468.
2. E. A. Di Marzio, C. M. Guttman, Macromolecules 1987, 20, 1403–1407.
3. M. Kapnistos, M. Lang, D. Vlassopoulos, W. Pyckhout-Hintzen, D. Richter, D. Cho, T. Chang, M. Rubinstein, Nat. Mater. 2008, 7, 997–1002.
4. R. M. Robertson, S. Laib, D. E. Smith, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 7310–7314.
5. T. Yamamoto, Polym. J. 2013, 45, 711–717.
6. B. Y. Zhang, H. Zhang, Y. J. Li, J. N. Hoskins, S. M. Grayson, ACS Macro Lett. 2013, 2, 845–848.
7. K. Heo, Y. Y. Kim, Y. Kitazawa, M. Kim, K. S. Jin, T. Yamamoto, M. Ree, ACS Macro Lett. 2014, 3, 233–239.
8. S. Honda, T. Yamamoto, Y. Tezuka, Nat. Commun. 2013, 4, 1574.
9. B. Zhao, W. J. Brittain, Prog. Polym. Sci. 2000, 25, 677–710.
10. M. Husseman, E. E. Malmstrom, M. McNamara, M. Mate, D. Mecerreyes, D. G. Benoit, J. L. Hedrick, P. Mansky, E. Huang, T. P. Russell, C. J. Hawker, Macromolecules 1999, 32, 1424–1431.
11. K. Matyjaszewski, P. J. Miller, N. Shukla, B. Immaraporn, A. Gelman, B. B. Luokala, T. M. Siclovan, G. Kickelbick, T. Vallant, H. Hoffmann, T. Pakula, Macromolecules 1999, 32, 8716–8724.
12. S. T. Milner, Science 1991, 251, 905–914.
13. A. Halperin, Langmuir 1999, 15, 2525–2533.
14. I. Banerjee, R. C. Pangule, R. S. Kane, Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 690–718.
15. L. Moroni, M. K. Gunnewiek, E. M. Benetti, Acta Biomater. 2014, 10, 2367–2378.
16. N. Erathodiyil, J. Y. Ying, Acc. Chem. Res. 2011, 44, 925–935.
17. C. Xu, K. Xu, H. Gu, R. Zheng, H. Liu, X. Zhang, Z. Guo, B. Xu, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2004, 126, 9938–9939.
18. J. Pyun, S. J. Jia, T. Kowalewski, G. D. Patterson, K. Matyjaszewski, Macromolecules 2003, 36, 5094–5104.
19. J. Klein, Y. Kamiyama, H. Yoshizawa, J. N. Israelachvili, G. H. Fredrickson, P. Pincus, L. J. Fetters, Macromolecules 1993, 26, 5552–5560.
20. X. P. Yan, S. S. Perry, N. D. Spencer, S. Pasche, S. M. De Paul, M. Textor, M. S. Lim, Langmuir 2004, 20, 423–428.
21. M. T. Müller, X. P. Yan, S. W. Lee, S. S. Perry, N. D. Spencer, Macromolecules 2005, 38, 5706–5713.
22. B. Zdyrko, I. Luzinov, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2011, 32, 859–869.
23. T. X. Viegas, M. D. Bentley, J. M. Harris, Z. F. Fang, K. Yoon, B. Dizman, R. Weimer, A. Mero, G. Pasut, F. M. Veronese, Bioconjugate Chem. 2011, 22, 976–986.
24. R. Hoogenboom, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 7978–7994;
25. Angew. Chem. 2009, 121, 8122–8138.
26. J. Ulbricht, R. Jordan, R. Luxenhofer, Biomaterials 2014, 35, 4848–4861.
27. B. Pidhatika, M. Rodenstein, Y. Chen, E. Rakhmatullina, A. Muhlebach, C. Acikgoz, M. Textor, R. Konradi, Biointerphases 2012, 7, 1.
28. R. Konradi, C. Acikgoz, M. Textor, Macromol. Rapid Commun. 2012, 33, 1663–1676.
29. B. Pidhatika, J. Möller, E. M. Benetti, R. Konradi, E. Rakhmatullina, A. Mühlebach, R. Zimmermann, C. Werner, V. Vogel, M. Textor, Biomaterials 2010, 31, 9462–9472.
30. B. A. Laurent, S. M. Grayson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2006, 128, 4238–4239.
31. M. A. Cortez, W. T. Godbey, Y. L. Fang, M. E. Payne, B. J. Cafferty, K. A. Kosakowska, S. M. Grayson, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015, 137, 6541–6549.
32. B. Malisova, S. Tosatti, M. Textor, K. Gademann, S. Zurcher, Langmuir 2010, 26, 4018–4026.
33. P. Kingshott, H. Thissen, H. J. Griesser, Biomaterials 2002, 23, 2043–2056.
34. X. P. Qiu, F. Tanaka, F. M. Winnik, Macromolecules 2007, 40, 7069–7071.
35. J. Xu, J. Ye, S. Y. Liu, Macromolecules 2007, 40, 9103–9110.
36. J. Ye, J. Xu, J. M. Hu, X. F. Wang, G. Z. Zhang, S. Y. Liu, C. Wu, Macromolecules 2008, 41, 4416–4422.
37. Y. Satokawa, T. Shikata, F. Tanaka, X. P. Qiu, F. M. Winnik, Macromolecules 2009, 42, 1400–1403.
38. P. G. de Gennes, Macromolecules 1980, 13, 1069–1075.
39. S. J. Sofia, V. Premnath, E. W. Merrill, Macromolecules 1998, 31, 5059–5070.
40. in Figure SThe adsorption kinetics of PEOXAs at RT and CP is not directly indicative of the remaining swollen thickness recorded for each brush, which was calculated by fitting the initial and the final frequency and dissipation shifts according to an extended viscoelastic model, as described in detail in the Supporting Information. For this reason, the apparent higher adsorbed mass by L-PEOXA-11 at CP with respect to L-PEOXA-6 was not reflected by the formation of a thicker brush. As shown 11 in the Supporting Information, the hydrated mass of L-PEOXA-6 was higher than the corresponding mass of L-PEOXA-11 after rinsing the functionalized sensors by ultra-pure water. It is also noteworthy that under CP conditions the formation of polymer multilayers is likely to take place. For this reason, during both QCM-D and VASE measurements, the samples were rinsed for several hours, until stable and constant values of thickness/mass could be recorded. A comprehensive stability study performed on the different brush films is reported in the Supporting Information.
41. 2 surface) and the presence of an hydration layer at the brush–medium interface, likely affected the FS profiles measured by C-AFM on the different PEOXA brushes. These contributions resulted in an overestimate of the brush equilibrium swollen thickness by 1 nm as measured by C-AFM for both linear and cyclic PEOXA brushes if compared to the swollen thickness measured by QCM-D.
42. S. Pasche, M. Textor, L. Meagher, N. D. Spencer, H. J. Griesser, Langmuir 2005, 21, 6508–6520.
43. S. Z. He, H. Merlitz, C. F. Su, C. X. Wu, Chin. Phys. B 2013, 22, 016101.
44. We predict that the distinctive chain crowding by the cyclic brush could hinder the primary adsorption of smaller biomolecules (or polypeptides) more efficiently than analogous linear grafts.
45. S. Lee, N. D. Spencer, Science 2008, 319, 575–576.
46. I. M. Neelov, O. V. Borisov, K. Binder, J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 108, 6973–6988.
47. T. Drobek, N. D. Spencer, Langmuir 2008, 24, 1484–1488.
48. S. de Beer, E. Kutnyanszky, P. M. Schon, G. J. Vancso, M. H. Muser, Nat. Commun. 2014, 5, 37810.
49. A. Erbas, J. Paturej, Soft Matter 2015, 11, 3139–3148.