PhD without the Ph?

Nursing Inquiry

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 281-282

  Thorne, Sally ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHY; PROCEDURES; SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION;

EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; FACULTY, NURSING; HUMANS; LEADERSHIP; NURSING RESEARCH; PHILOSOPHY, NURSING;

EID: 84995551132     PISSN: 13207881     EISSN: 14401800     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/nin.12169     Document Type: Editorial

References (14)

1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2010). The research-focused doctoral program in nursing: Pathways to excellence. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/education-resources/PhDPosition.pdf
2. American Association of Colleges of Nursing. (2015). Nursing faculty shortage fact sheet. Retrieved from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/media-relations/FacultyShortageFS.pdf
3. Canadian Association of Schools of Nursing. (2011). Position statement: Doctoral education in nursing in Canada. Retrieved from http://casn.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/DoctoralEducation2011.pdf
4. Fawcett, J. (2013). Thoughts about multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary, and transdisciplinary research. Nursing Science Quarterly, 16, 376–379.
5. Fowler, M. (2015). Guide to nursing's social policy statement: Understanding the profession from social contract to social covenant. Silver Spring, MD: American Nurses Association.
6. Institute of Medicine (2010). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
7. Kim, M. J., Park, C. C., Park, S. H., Khan, S., & Ketefian, S. (2014). Quality of nursing doctoral education and scholarly performance in U.S. schools of nursing: Strategic areas for improvement. Journal of Professional Nursing, 30, 10–18.
8. McKenna, H., Keeney, S., Kim, M. J., & Park, C. G. (2014). Quality of doctoral nursing education in the United Kingdom: Exploring the views of doctoral students and staff based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 70, 1639–1652.
9. Oermann, M. H., Lynn, M. R., & Agger, C. A. (2016). Hiring intentions of directors of nursing programs related to DNP- and PhD-prepared faculty and roles of faculty. Journal of Professional Nursing, 32, 273–279.
10. Regh, E., & SmithBattle, L. (2015). On to the ‘rough ground’: Introducing doctoral students to philosophical perspectives on knowledge. Nursing Philosophy, 16, 98–109.
11. Smeltzer, S. C., Sharts-Hopko, N. C., Cantrell, M. A., Heverly, M. S., Nthenge, S., & Jenkinson, A. (2015). A profile of U.S. nursing faculty in research- and practice-focused doctoral education. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 47, 178–185.
12. Thorne, S. (2009). Ideas and action in a terrrain of complexity. Nursing Philosophy, 10, 149–151.
13. Thorne, S., & Sawatzky, R. (2014). Particularizing the general: Sustaining theoretical integrity in the context of an evidence-based practice agenda. Advances in Nursing Science, 37(1), 5–18.
14. Wyman, J. F., & Henly, S. J. (2015). PhD programs in nursing in the United States: Visibility of American Association of Colleges of Nursing core curricular elements and emerging areas of science. Nursing Outlook, 63, 390–397.