Quality of Nursing Doctoral Education and Scholarly Performance in U.S. Schools of Nursing: Strategic Areas for Improvement

Journal of Professional Nursing

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 10-18

  Kim, Mi Ja ^a   Park, Chang Gi ^a   Park, So Hyun ^a   Khan, Shaheen ^a   Ketefian, Shaké ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

Nursing doctoral education; Quality evaluation; Strategic areas

Indexed keywords

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; NURSING EDUCATION; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES; VALIDATION STUDY;

CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EDUCATION, NURSING, GRADUATE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84893419272     PISSN: 87557223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2013.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Indicators of quality in research-focused doctoral programs in nursing Retrieved from. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/publications/position/quality-indicators.
2. American Association of Colleges of Nursing (AACN) Institutions offering doctoral programs in nursing and degrees conferred Retrieved from. http://www.aacn.nche.edu/IDS/pdf/DOC.pdf.
3. Arimoto A., Gregg M.F., Nagata S., Miki Y., Murashima S. Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs in Japan by faculty members and their educational and research activities. Nurse Education Today 2012, 32:e1-e7. 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.06.007.
4. Barhyte D.Y., Holzemer W.L. Cooperative program evaluation project in doctoral education in nursing. Proceedings of the Annual Forum on Doctoral Education in Nursing (pp. 68-109) 1980, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
5. Berlin L.E., Sechrist K.R. The shortage of doctorally prepared nursing faculty: A dire situation. Nursing Outlook 2002, 50:50-56. 10.1067/mno.2002.124270.
6. Charnes A., Cooper W.W. Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research 1978, 2:429-444.
7. Chin W.W. Commentary: Issues and opinion on structural equation modeling. MIS Quarterly 1998, 22:vii-xvi.
8. Chioni R.M. Discussion: Areas in which quality control is essential. Journal of Professional Nursing 1985, 1:108-109.
9. Diamantopoulos A., Siguaw J.A. Formative versus reflective indicators in organizational measure development: A comparison and empirical illustration. British Journal of Management 2006, 17:263-282. 10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.00500.x.
10. Diamantopoulos A., Winklhofer H.M. Index construction with formative indicators: An alternative to scale development. Journal of Marketing Research 2001, 38:269-277.
11. Dolinsky A.L. Considering the competition in strategy development: An extension of importance-performance analysis. Journal of Health Care Marketing 1991, 11:31-36.
12. Holzemer W.L. Quality in graduate nursing education. Nursing & Health Care 1982, 3:171-189.
13. Holzemer W.L. Doctoral education in nursing: An assessment of quality, 1979-1984. Nursing Research 1987, 36:111-116. 10.1097/00006199-198703000-00008.
14. Holzemer W.L., Chambers D.B. Healthy nursing doctoral programs: Relationship between perceptions of the academic environment and productivity of faculty and alumni. Research in Nursing & Health 1986, 9:299-307. 10.1002/nur.4770090407.
15. International Network for Doctoral Education in Nursing (INDEN) Quality criteria, standards, and indicators (QCSI) for doctoral programs in nursing Retrieved from. http://www.umich.edu/~inden/quality/qsci1204.pdf.
16. International Network for Doctoral Education in Nursing (INDEN) Directory of international doctoral programs Retrieved from. http://nursing.jhu.edu/academics/programs/doctoral/phd/inden/programs.html.
17. Jamann J.S. Proceedings of doctoral programs in nursing: Consensus for quality. Journal of Professional Nursing 1985, 1:90-122.
18. Ketefian S., Davidson P., Daly J., Chang E., Srisuphan W. Issues and challenges in international doctoral education in nursing. Nursing & Health Sciences 2005, 7:150-156.
19. Kim M.J., McKenna H.P., Ketefian S. Global quality criteria, standards, and indicators for doctoral programs in nursing; Literature review and guideline development. International Journal of Nursing Studies 2006, 43:477-489. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2005.07.003.
20. Kim M.J., Park C.G., Kim M.J., Lee H.K., Ahn Y.H., Kim E.W., et al. Quality of nursing doctoral education in Korea: Toward policy development. Journal of Advanced Nursing 2012, 68:1494-1503. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05885.x.
21. Kjellgren K.I., Welin C., Danielson E. Evaluation of doctoral nursing programs - A review and a strategy for follow up. Nurse Education Today 2005, 25:316-325. 10.1016/j.nedt.2005.02.002.
22. Martilla J.A., James J. Importance-performance analysis. The Journal of Marketing 1977, 41:77-79.
23. Minnick A.F., Halstead L.A. A data-based agenda for doctoral nursing education reform. Nursing Outlook 2002, 50:24-29. 10.1067/mno.2002.121101.
24. Minnick A.F., Norman L.D., Donaghey B., Fisher L.W., McKirgan I.M. Defining and describing capacity issues in US doctoral nursing research programs. Nursing Outlook 2010, 58:36-43. 10.1016/j.outlook.2009.10.001.
25. Morrison E., Zumeta W., Rudd E., Nerad M. What matters for excellence in PhD programsα Latent constructs of doctoral program quality used by early career social scientists. Journal of Higher Education 2011, 82:535-563.
26. Nagata S., Gregg M.F., Miki Y., Arimoto A., Murashima S., Kim M.J. Evaluation of doctoral nursing education in Japan by students, graduates, and faculty: A comparative study based on a cross-sectional questionnaire survey. Nurse Education Today 2012, 32:361-367. 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.05.019.
27. Rossiter J.R. The C-OAR-SE procedure for scale development in marketing. International Journal of Research in Marketing 2002, 19:305-335.
28. The Chronicle of Higher Education The 2010 rankings: Doctoral programs in America Retrieved from. http://chronicle.com/section/Home/5.
29. Wittink D.R., Bayer B.L. The measurement imperative. Marketing Research 1994, 6:14-24.