Walking Away from Type 2 diabetes: a cluster randomized controlled trial

Diabetic Medicine

Volumn 34, Issue 5, 2017, Pages 698-707

  Yates, T ^a,b   Edwardson, C L ^a,b   Henson, J ^a,b   Gray, L J ^c   Ashra, N B ^a   Troughton, J ^a   Khunti, K ^a,b   Davies, M J ^a,b  

^a LEICESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b Leicester Diabetes Centre ^*  (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; HIGH DENSITY LIPOPROTEIN CHOLESTEROL;

ACCELEROMETER; ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; EDUCATION PROGRAM; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; IMPAIRED GLUCOSE TOLERANCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; METABOLIC EQUIVALENT; MIDDLE AGED; MOBILIZATION; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PEDOMETER; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SMOKING; SOCIAL ISOLATION; WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE; WALKING; ACTIMETRY; AGED; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; EXERCISE; HEALTH PROMOTION; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PHYSIOLOGY; PREDIABETIC STATE; PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR;

ACTIGRAPHY; AGED; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; EXERCISE; FEMALE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOTOR ACTIVITY; PREDIABETIC STATE; RISK FACTORS; WALKING;

EID: 84995486973     PISSN: 07423071     EISSN: 14645491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/dme.13254     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. 1c levels in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2011; 305: 1790–1799.
2. Gillies CL, Abrams KR, Lambert PC, Cooper NJ, Sutton AJ, Hsu RT, Khunti K. Pharmacological and lifestyle interventions to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in people with impaired glucose tolerance: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2007; 334: 299.
3. Yates T, Haffner SM, Schulte PJ, Thomas L, Huffman KM, Bales CW et al. Association between change in daily ambulatory activity and cardiovascular events in people with impaired glucose tolerance (NAVIGATOR trial): a cohort analysis. Lancet 2014; 383: 1059–1066.
4. Jeon CY, Lokken RP, Hu FB, van Dam RM. Physical activity of moderate intensity and risk of type 2 diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 744–752.
5. Matthews L, Kirk A, MacMillan F, Mutrie N. Can physical activity interventions for adults with type 2 diabetes be translated into practice settings? A systematic review using the RE-AIM framework. Trans Behav Med 2014; 4: 60–78.
6. Cardona-Morrell M, Rychetnik L, Morrell SL, Espinel PT, Bauman A. Reduction of diabetes risk in routine clinical practice: are physical activity and nutrition interventions feasible and are the outcomes from reference trials replicable? A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health 2010; 10: 1.
7. Yates T, Davies M, Gorely T, Bull F, Khunti K. Rationale, design and baseline data from the Pre-diabetes Risk Education and Physical Activity Recommendation and Encouragement (PREPARE) programme study: a randomized controlled trial. Patient Educ Couns 2008; 73: 264–271.
8. Yates T, Davies M, Gorely T, Bull F, Khunti K. Effectiveness of a pragmatic education program designed to promote walking activity in individuals with impaired glucose tolerance: a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 1404–1410.
9. Gray L, Davies M, Hiles S, Taub N, Webb D, Srinivasan B, Khunti K. Detection of impaired glucose regulation and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus, using primary care electronic data, in a multiethnic UK community setting. Diabetologia 2012; 55: 959–966.
10. Yates T, Davies MJ, Henson J, Troughton J, Edwardson C, Gray LJ, Khunti K. Walking away from type 2 diabetes: trial protocol of a cluster randomised controlled trial evaluating a structured education programme in those at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. BMC Fam Pract 2012; 13: 46.
11. Gray L, Khunti K, Edwardson C, Goldby S, Henson J, Morris D et al. Implementation of the automated Leicester Practice Risk Score in two diabetes prevention trials provides a high yield of people with abnormal glucose tolerance. Diabetologia 2012; 55: 3238–3244.
12. Tudor-Locke C, Johnson WD, Katzmarzyk PT. Accelerometer-determined steps per day in US adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009; 41: 1384–1391.
13. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1998; 30: 777–781.
14. Booth ML, Ainsworth BE, Pratt M, Ekelund U, Yngve A, Sallis JF, Oja P. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 195: 3508–1381.
15. World Health Organization (WHO). Definition and Diagnoses of Diabetes Mellitus and Intermediate Hyperglycemia. Geneva: WHO, 2006.
16. 1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Abbreviated report of a WHO consultation, 2011. Available at http://www.who.int/diabetes/publications/diagnosis_diabetes2011/en/ Last accessed 8 February 2016.
17. Roe L, Strong C, Whiteside C, Neil A, Mant D. Dietary intervention in primary care: validity of the DINE method for diet assessment. Fam Pract 1994; 11: 375–381.
18. Sintonen H. The 15D instrument of health-related quality of life: properties and applications. Ann Med 2001; 33: 328–336.
19. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1983; 67: 361–370.
20. Broadbent E, Petrie KJ, Main J, Weinman J. The brief illness perception questionnaire. J Psychosom Res 2006; 60: 631–637.
21. Medical Research Council. Cluster randomised trials: methodological and ethical considerations, 2002. Available at http://www.cebma.org/wp-content/uploads/Cluster-randomised-trials-Methodological-and-ethical-considerations.pdf Last accessed 27 August 2015.
22. Kinmonth A, Wareham NJ, Hardeman W, Sutton S, Prevost AT, Fanshawe T et al. Efficacy of a theory-based behavioural intervention to increase physical activity in an at-risk group in primary care (ProActive UK): a randomised trial. Lancet 2008; 371: 41–48.
23. Andrews R, Cooper A, Montgomery A, Norcross A, Peters T, Sharp D et al. Diet or diet plus physical activity versus usual care in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: the Early ACTID randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2011; 378: 129–139.
24. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE). Preventing type 2 diabetes: risk identification and interventions for individuals at high risk, 2012. Available at https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ph38 Last accessed 8 February 2016.
25. NHS England. NHS Diabetes Prevention Programme (NHS DPP), 2015. Available at http://www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/qual-clin-lead/action-for-diabetes/diabetes-prevention/ Last accessed 14 August 2015.
26. Plotnikoff RC, Lippke S, Trinh L, Courneya KS, Birkett N, Sigal RJ. Protection motivation theory and the prediction of physical activity among adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes in a large population sample. Br J Health Psychol 2010; 15: 643-661.
27. van Puffelen AL, Heijmans MJ, Rijken M, Rutten GE, Nijpels G, Schellevis FG. Illness perceptions and self-care behaviours in the first years of living with type 2 diabetes; does the presence of complications matter? Psychol Health 2015; 30: 1274-1287.
28. Ackermann RT, Finch EA, Brizendine E, Zhou H, Marrero DG. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program into the community: the DEPLOY pilot study. Am J Prev Med 2008; 35: 357–363.
29. Absetz P, Valve R, Oldenburg B, Heinonen H, Nissinen A, Fogelholm M et al. Type 2 diabetes prevention in the ‘real world’: one-year results of the GOAL Implementation Trial. Diabetes Care 2007; 30: 2465–2470.
30. Yates T, Griffin S, Bodicoat DH, Brierly G, Dallosso H, Davies MJ et al. PRomotion Of Physical activity through structured Education with differing Levels of ongoing Support for people at high risk of type 2 diabetes (PROPELS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2015; 16: 289–015-0813-z.