Implementation of the automated Leicester Practice Risk Score in two diabetes prevention trials provides a high yield of people with abnormal glucose tolerance

Diabetologia

Volumn 55, Issue 12, 2012, Pages 3238-3244

  Gray, L J ^a   Khunti, K ^a   Edwardson, C ^b   Goldby, S ^b   Henson, J ^b   Morris, D H ^a   Sheppard, D ^a   Webb, D ^a   Williams, S ^b   Yates, T ^a   Davies, M J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEICESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b LEICESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Impaired glucose regulation; Prevalence; Primary care; Screening; Type 2 diabetes

Indexed keywords

ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENT; GLUCOSE; HEMOGLOBIN A1C; STATIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEMOGLOBIN BLOOD LEVEL; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HUMAN; IMPAIRED GLUCOSE TOLERANCE; LEICESTER PRACTICE RISK SCORE; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MEDICAL PRACTICE; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; ORAL GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; WAIST CIRCUMFERENCE;

ADULT; AGED; BLOOD GLUCOSE; FEMALE; GLUCOSE INTOLERANCE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH PRIORITIES; HEALTH PROMOTION; HEMOGLOBIN A, GLYCOSYLATED; HUMANS; MALE; MASS SCREENING; MIDDLE AGED; PREDIABETIC STATE; PREVALENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84868205091     PISSN: 0012186X     EISSN: 14320428     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00125-012-2725-8     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Gillies CL, Abrams KR, Lambert PC et al (2007) Pharmacological and lifestyle interventions to prevent or delay type 2 diabetes in people with impaired glucose tolerance: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 334:299
2. Gillies CL, Lambert PC, Abrams KR et al (2008) Different strategies for screening and prevention of type 2 diabetes in adults: cost effectiveness analysis. BMJ 336:1180-1185
3. Collins GS, Mallett S, Omar O, Yu L (2011) Developing risk prediction models for type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of methodology and reporting. BMC Med 9:103
4. Griffin SJ, Little PS, Hales CN, Kinmonth AL, Wareham NJ (2000) Diabetes risk score: towards earlier detection of type 2 diabetes in general practice. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 16:164-171
5. Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Robson J, Sheikh A, Brindle P (2009) Predicting risk of type 2 diabetes in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QDScore. BMJ 388:b880
6. Gray LJ, Davies MJ, Hiles S et al (2012) Detection of impaired glucose regulation and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus, using primary care electronic data, in a multiethnic UK community setting. Diabetologia 55:959-966
7. Gray LJ, Taub N, Khunti K et al (2010) The Leicester Risk Assessment score for detecting undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose regulation for use in a multiethnic UK setting. Diabet Med 27:887-895
8. Chatterton H, Younger T, Fischer A, Khunti K, on behalf of the Programme Development Group (2012) Risk identification and interventions to prevent type 2 diabetes in adults at high risk: summary of NICE guidance. BMJ 345:e4624
9. World Health Organization (1999) Definition, diagnosis, and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Report of a WHO consultation. Part 1: Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus. Report. World Health Organization, Geneva
10. Gray LJ, Khunti K, Williams S et al (2012) Let's Prevent Diabetes: study protocol for a cluster randomised controlled trial of an educational intervention in a multi-ethnic UK population with screen detected impaired glucose regulation. Cardiovasc Diabetol 11:56
11. Yates T, Davies MJ, Henson J et al (2012) Walking away from type 2 diabetes: trial protocol of a cluster randomized controlled trial evaluating a structured education programme in those at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes. BMC Fam Pract 13:46
12. American Diabetes Association (2010) Standards of medical care in diabetes -2010. Diabet Care 33:S11-S61
13. Webb D, Khunti K, Srinivasan B et al (2010) Rationale and design of the ADDITION-Leicester study, a systematic screening programme and randomised controlled trial of multi-factorial cardiovascular risk intervention in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus detected by screening. Trials 19:16
14. Webb DR, Gray LJ, Khunti K et al (2011) Screening for diabetes using an oral glucose tolerance test within a western multi-ethnic population identifies modifiable cardiovascular risk: the ADDITION-Leicester study. Diabetologia 54:2237-2246
15. van den Donk M, Sandbaek A, Borch-Johnsen K et al (2011) Screening for type 2 diabetes. Lessons from the ADDITIONEurope study. Diabet Med 28:1416-1424
16. Khunti K, Taub N, Gillies C et al (2012) A comparison of cost per case detected of screening strategies for type 2 diabetes and impaired glucose regulation: modelling study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. doi:10.1016/j.diabres. 2012.03.009
17. Dalton ARH, Bottle A, Okoro C, Majeed A, Millett C (2011) Uptake of the NHS Health Checks programme in a deprived, culturally diverse setting: cross-sectional study. J Public Health 33:422-429
18. Waugh N, Scotland G, McNamee P et al (2007) Screening for type 2 diabetes: literature review and economic modelling. Health Technol Assess 11:1-125
19. Eborall H, Stone M, Aujla N, Taub N, Davies M, Khunti K (2012) Influences on the uptake of diabetes screening: a qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract 62:e204-e211
20. Griffin SJ, Borch-Johnsen K, Davies MJ et al (2011) Effect of early intensivemultifactorial therapy on 5-year cardiovascular outcomes in individuals with type 2 diabetes detected by screening (ADDITIONEurope): a cluster-randomised trial. Lancet 378:156-167
21. Gray LJ, Tringham J, Davies MJ et al (2010) Screening for type 2 diabetes in a multiethnic setting using known risk factors to identify those at high risk: a cross-sectional study. Vasc Health Risk Manag 6:837-842
22. World Health Organization (2011) Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. World Health Organization, Geneva
23. de Lusignan S, van Weel C (2006) The use of routinely collected computer data for research in primary care: opportunities and challenges. Fam Pract 23:253-263