Individualized cost-effectiveness analysis of patient-centered care: a case series of hospitalized patient preferences departing from practice-based guidelines

Journal of Medical Economics

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 288-296

  Padula, William V ^a   Millis, M Andrew ^b   Worku, Aelaf D ^c,d   Pronovost, Peter J ^e   Bridges, John F P ^a   Meltzer, David O ^c,f  

^a JOHNS HOPKINS BLOOMBERG SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d CareMore Health Plan   (United States)

^e JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

cost effectiveness analysis; guidelines; Patient preferences; patient centered care

Indexed keywords

HEMOGLOBIN; ISPAGULA;

ADULT; AFRICAN AMERICAN; AGED; AIR FLUIDIZED BED; ARTICLE; BLOOD TRANSFUSION; BODY MASS; CANCER PATIENT; CASE REPORT; CHRONIC CONSTIPATION; CHRONIC KIDNEY FAILURE; COLON CANCER; COLONOSCOPY; CORONARY ARTERY BYPASS GRAFT; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DECISION TREE; DECUBITUS; DIASTOLIC HEART FAILURE; DIET; EMERGENCY WARD; FAMILY HISTORY; FECES; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEART ARREST; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; INTESTINE MOTILITY; JEHOVAH'S WITNESS; LEG AMPUTATION; LIMITED MOBILITY; LYMPHADENOPATHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OCCULT BLOOD; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; RESUSCITATION; TERMINAL CARE; VERY ELDERLY; WEIGHT REDUCTION; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC MODEL; ECONOMICS; THERAPY;

ADULT; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ECONOMIC; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITY-ADJUSTED LIFE YEARS; THERAPEUTICS;

EID: 84994837789     PISSN: 13696998     EISSN: 1941837X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2016.1254091     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Pronovost PJ, Vohr E., Safe patients, smart hospitals:how one doctor's checklist can help us change health care from the inside out. New York, NY:Penguin, 2010
2. Mold JW, Gregory ME., Best practices research. Fam Med 2003;35:131-4
3. Fisher ES, McClellan MB, Safran DG., Building the path to accountable care. N Engl J Med 2011;365:2445-7
4. Bingham SL., Refusal of treatment and decision-making capacity. Nurs Ethics 2012;19:167-72
5. Llewellyn-Thomas HA, Crump RT., Decision support for patients:values clarification and preference elicitation. MCRR 2013;70(1 Suppl):50s-79s
6. Padula WV, Wald HM, Makic HM., Pressure ulcer risk pssessment and prevention. Ann Intern Med 2013;159:718
7. Meterko M, Wright S, Lin H, et al. Mortality among patients with acute myocardial infarction:the influences of patient-centered care and evidence-based medicine. Health Serv Res 2010;45:1188-204
8. Veroff D, Marr A, Wennberg DE., Enhanced support for shared decision making reduced costs of care for patients with preference-sensitive conditions. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013;32:285-93
9. Ioannidis JP, Garber AM., Individualized cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS Med 2011;8:e1001058
10. Consumer Price Index. May 2007 National occupational employment and wage estimates. In:U.S. Department of Labor, editor. Washington DC:Bureau of Labor Statistics Division of Occupational Employment Statistics, 2007
11. Claxton G, Rae M, Panchal N, et al. Health benefits in 2014:stability in premiums and coverage for employer-sponsored plans. Health Affairs 2014;33:1851-60
12. Sullivan PW, Ghushchyan V., Preference-based EQ-5D index scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Decis Making 2006;26:410-20
13. Hur C, Chung DC, Schoen RE, et al. The management of small polyps found by virtual colonoscopy:results of a decision analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Off Clin Pract Je Am Gastroenterol Assoc 2007;5:237-44
14. Prevention and treatment of pressure ulcers:clinical practice guideline. Washington, DC:National Pressure Ulcer Advisory Panel (NPUAP), 2014. http://www.npuap.org/resources/educational-and-clinical-resources/prevention-and-treatment-of-pressure-ulcers-clinical-practice-guideline/. Accessed May 15, 2015
15. Sullivan PW, Lawrence WF, Ghushchyan V., A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Care 2005;43:736-49
16. West JM., Ethical issues in the care of Jehovah's Witnesses. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2014;27:170-6
17. Menon PR, Ehlenbach WJ, Ford DW, et al. Multiple in-hospital resuscitation efforts in the elderly. Crit Care Med 2014;42:108-17
18. Basu A, Meltzer D., Value of information on preference heterogeneity and individualized care. Medical Decision Making 2007;27:112-27
19. Meltzer DO., Accounting for future costs in medical cost-effectiveness analysis. J Health Econ 1997;16:33-64
20. Meltzer DO., Hospitalists and the doctor-patient relationship. J Legal Studies 2001;30:589-606
21. Padula WV, Gibbons RD, Pronovost PJ, et al. Using clinical data to predict high-cost performance coding issues associated with pressure ulcers:a multilevel cohort model. JAMIA 2016; [Epub ahead of print, August 18, 2016]
22. Jensen CD, Corley DA, Quinn VP, et al. Fecal immunochemical test program performance over 4 rounds of annual screening: a retrospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2016;164:456-63
23. Armstrong BG, Sloan M., Ordinal regression models for epidemiologic data. Am J Epidemiol 1989;129:191-204
24. Phillips RL, Jr., Bartholomew LA, Dovey SM, et al. Learning from malpractice claims about negligent, adverse events in primary care in the United States. Qual Saf Health Care 2004;13:121-26
25. Messner DA, Towse A, Mohr P, et al. The future of comparative effectiveness and relative efficacy of drugs:an international perspective. J Comp Eff Res 2015;4:419-27
26. Frank L, Basch E, Selby JV., The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. JAMA 2014;312:1513-14
27. Methodology Committee of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). Methodological standards and patient-centeredness in comparative effectiveness research:the PCORI perspective. JAMA 2012;307:1636-40
28. Padula WV, Duffy MP, Yilmaz T, et al. Integrating systems engineering practice with health-care delivery. Health Syst 2014;3:159-64
29. Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Van Ballegooijen M, Zauber AG, et al. Effect of rising chemotherapy costs on the cost savings of colorectal cancer screening. J National Cancer Inst 2009;101:1412-22
30. Padula WV, Mishra MK, Makic MB, et al. Improving the quality of pressure ulcer care with prevention:a cost-effectiveness analysis. Med Care 2011;49:385-92
31. Forbes JM, Anderson MD, Anderson GF, et al. Blood transfusion costs:a multicenter study. Transfusion 1991;31:318-23
32. Cox CE, Carson SS, Govert JA, et al. An Economic evaluation of prolonged mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med 2007;35:1918-27
33. Warren BB, Durieux ME., Hydroxyethyl starch:safe or not? Anesth Analg 1997;84:206-12
34. Kong CY, Meng L, Omer ZB, et al. MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery for uterine fibroid treatment:a cost-effectiveness analysis. Am J Roentgenol 2014;203:361-71
35. Pizzi LT, Bunz TJ, Coyne DW, et al. Ferric gluconate treatment provides cost savings in patients with high ferritin and low transferrin saturation. Kidney Int 2008;74:1588-95
36. Powell J, Gurk-Turner C., Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp). Proceedings (Baylor University Medical Center). 2002;15:332-5
37. Sznajder M, Aegerter P, Launois R, et al. A cost-effectiveness analysis of stays in intensive care units. Intensive Care Med 2001;27:146-53
38. The Dartmouth Atlas. Inpatient spending per decedent during the last six months of life, by gender and level of care intensity. Lebanon, NH:Trustees of Dartmouth, 2015. http://www.dartmouthatlas.org/data/table.aspx?ind=102&loc=2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11&loct =2&fmt =127&ch =9,32. Accessed July 20, 2016
39. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191-200
40. Shaw JW, Johnson JA, Coons SJ., US valuation of the EQ-5D health states:development and testing of the D1 valuation model. Med Care 2005;43:203-20